Talk:Robert Pattinson

remember me

remember me is in post-production. or at least emilie and rob are done filming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.145.60 (talk) 06:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Please remember WP:FORUM • S • C • A • R • C • E • 09:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

what? remember me is in post-production. it's not an opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.145.60 (talk) 01:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I never said anything about an opinion, talk page content should only discuss improvements to the article, do you plan on adding something to article about "Remember Me" being in post-production? This is not a place for general announcements • S • C • A • R • C • E • 01:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, it obviously is, because next to his filmography, it says remember me is filming, which is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.120.130 (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I never said it wan't, I'm just saying this isn't the Robert Pattinson general announcement board • S • C • A • R • C • E • 00:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

+ New MOON IS FINISHED AND ECLIPSE ISFILMING IN VANCOVER CANADA

Well, next to remember me in filmography, it says it is currently filming. im just saying that is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.120.130 (talk) 06:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, that is just minor edit, the talk page didn't have to notified of it. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 13:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

okay. then edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.106.4 (talk) 20:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

This coversation is pointless • S • C • A • R • C • E • 00:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

the conversation would stop if you would JUST EDIT IT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.106.4 (talk) 03:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I forgot the page was protected, I am so sorry! You were completely in the right, I'll edit it now, sorry. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 07:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable reference? • S • C • A • R • C • E • 08:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

umm, the fact that they're both done filming!? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.120.130 (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Where did you read that at? • S • C • A • R • C • E • 22:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

it's obvious! rob's already working on eclipse and emilie's done filming. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.120.130 (talk) 04:12, 12 Augu st 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Since the fact it's filming is unreferenced and needs to be, I'll bump it up to post-production and add a • S • C • A • R • C • E • 15:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Not a Cameo Appearance

His appearance in Harry Potter 4 is not a cameo appearance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.180.60.111 (talk) 10:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

No. It was not a cameo appearance, that's why it isn't labeled as a cameo. Part 5 however (which is billed as a cameo): He is not mentioned anywhere on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film) • S • C • A • R • C • E • 21:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Full Name & Place of Birth

According to official records on ancestry.co.uk, he was born Robert Douglas T. Pattinson in Merton, Surrey.Ravenscroft32 (talk) 00:59, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Is there proof that they're talking about him? Please provide a reference • S • C • A • R • C • E • 01:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes because it states his mother's maiden name as Charlton. It also lists two older sisters born in Merton (mother's maiden name Charlton) as stated in his bio. With further research you can find the marriage of Richard Pattinson to Clare Charlton, both names quoted in his bio. Starlemusique (talk) 22:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Also, you can find them all living together in the electoral role 2004-2007, 2009 and he is cited as Robert D Pattinson. Starlemusique (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Link? ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 23:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I can't seem to find the information you said was on there. Do you have to pay to access it? If you do, we can't use that as a reference, everything has to be accessible to anyone at anytime ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 23:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

No, you don't have to pay to view it, so I'm not sure why you can't see it. I'm also not sure what you mean by "keep in mind, a lot of the content is user submitted." The entry of birth is on an original scanned index page. Plus, where is the reference for the middle name Thomas. I can't find any reference to that fact at all. The birth record only records T. Starlemusique (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

In fact, going back through the edits on the page you can see that Thomas was removed as a middle name on the lead sentence because there was no notable reference for it. It wasn't removed from the info box at the same time and so someone then reinstated it about 3 months later unchallenged. I suggest we remove the Thomas altogether and leave it as "Robert Pattinson" or put in both Douglas and Thomas. Starlemusique (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

I've forgotten where the link is, could you please reprovide it? ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 21:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=ONSBirth84&so=2&rank=0&=,,,,,,,,1,+,,,1,+,,,1,+,,,1,+,,,,,1,+,,&gsfn=robert+douglas&gsln=pattinson&sx=&gs1co=1,All+Countries&gs1pl=1,+&year=&yearend=&sbo=0&sbor=&ufr=0&wp=4;_80000002;_80000003&srchb=r&prox=1&db=&ti=5538&ti.si=0&gss=angs-b

I've clicked on that link from other IPs and it works. That still doesn't provide the reference for Thomas though. By the way, the link for the valium quote is a dead link. Starlemusique (talk) 11:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Once on the page, do I have to click anything additional? Because from what I can see, there is no proof that is him. It's better to have a reference that states explicitly it is the actor ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 12:28, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

That's just the reference for the birth. You'd have to do other research to prove it (which has been done) but nothing explicitly states it. If it needs a reference like that then it will have to stay as Robert Pattinson, so for the same reasons the Thomas really needs to be removed. There is nothing that explicitly states that his middle name is Thomas other than this page and people who have taken the information from this page. Starlemusique (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I have removed his middle name until a better source can be provided per WP:BLP ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 22:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

It also says on the Robsessed DVD that his middle name is Thomas. Its a dvd, so i cant provide a source but that it the right name.--WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 14:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, I don't own the DVD but I'll trust your statement. I've added his middle name with Robsessed as the source. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 16:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Relationship with Kristen Stewart

This article says nothing on his on and off relationship with Twilight co-star Kristen Stewart and that the pair are living together and are engaged to be married. Don't you feel that those are kind of important facts under personal life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.10.116 (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

No, since none of those facts can be confirmed. Everything about his "relationship" with Stewart has originated from gossip shows and tabloids. If you can find a reliable source, such as either Pattinson or Stewart actually confirming they are (or have ever been) together, then it could be added. Andrea (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

This Belgian newspaper reported today that Robert and Kristen have admitted to be in a relationship in "an interview". They don't mention when or to whom this interview was given though. The paper is pretty much a tabloid anyway, so I doubt if this is credible. Link is here but in Dutch. 84.196.56.90 (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

It wouldn't suprise me but I don't really think they're dating. I think it just might be publicity for the Twilight Saga. But don't hold me to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaDavis1901 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

There is no official proof, it needs to be left out.--WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Oddly (given the lack of any confirmation on either side) the BBC referred to Kristen as being his girlfriend in this article about the BAFTAs: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8527511.stm Marthiemoo (talk) 23:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Many sources have claimed he admitted after the BAFTAs, but most are tabloids and might not be reliable. Its been put on Kristens page but i dont think it has reliable enough sources yet. --WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

He has recently confirmed it. It's the last thing mentioned in the "personal life" section ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 19:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Are we sure about that? We don't need to put any tabloid junk on the page we really need to make the pages as accurate as possible. That even goes for Kristen Stewart's page, even though I may not like her as an actress. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChelseaDavis1901 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

See below. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 19:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

I think he's in a relationship with a goat and she with a door.

His own opinions

How about some sort of mention of the opinion he has on the character that can be considered his biggest role? He's gone on the record saying he thinks that the book should have never been published and that it was written like it was some sort of wish fulfillment for Meyers. Here's an article about it. http://io9.com/5096763/twilight-makes-for-the-best-fanwank-ever I also checked the reliability of the site. They're not making stuff up, this is a website about various media forms of science fiction and fantasy. ... I say that so no one can make some sort of claim that this stuff isn't reputable. Either way, tonnes of other actors have said things that can be taken as controversial and this seems like it'd be important enough to merit mention. 99.240.146.252 (talk) 03:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC) The twilight director Catherine Hardwicke just confirm their relationship, she says Kristen told her that nothing cross the line in the first movie but in the second...I don't know..but I think is a good source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.106.220.3 (talk) 06:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Please can you put a better pic of Robert?

I mean, there are thousands of pics, better than the current one :)

Put something which justifies, why he is Edward Cullen :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.96.14.57 (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

A free image will never be replaced with a copyrighted one. The one we currently have can be used whenever, however as long as you attribute its creator. We will only use free images to depict a living person. If you can find a free one and verify it isn't copyrighted and placed under the wrong license, feel free to upload and use it. $©@®©Ξ 22:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The Scream Award

The section wear it says what awards he won doesn't mention the Scream Awards he won for Twilight I think they should be mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Takaylabs (talk • contribs) 21:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I might stand alone but I love that pic of him he looks natural and un-perfect which is when he is (in my opinion) at his sexiest. Edward Cullen is not Robert Pattinson... he's a character played by Robert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.8.18.30 (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Admits to Smoking

Hilarious. Some skillful fan weaseling there regarding the line where he says he 'admits' to taking valium... and smoking. I won't bother to edit this, it makes Wikipedia rather amusing to read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.171.96 (talk) 07:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Red links?

Wikipedia thrives on wikilinks - created by putting double square brackets around an item. Now, occasionally no-one has yet created the target of such a link. So, as an example Harrodian School will currently show as a red link - but you, or I, or anyone else can fix that by clicking through and creating an article. It's fine to be bold and create a pretty awful stub - trust that someone else will improve it. Once fixed it will change to a "normal" blue wikilink. - Lesson ends. - Snori (talk) 17:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Sisters

I can't think of a way to incorporate a link for his sister, Lizzy. He has one other sister but her name is not very well known so I think it falls into the WP:BLPNAME category. However, Lizzy appears to have enough notability to have her own article but not enough for a "...he is the sister of Lizzy Pattinson" sentence but a link in his article should definitely exist. Any ideas? ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 02:45, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson does NOT have twitter

A rep for Robert Pattinson is confirming that Robert does not have a twitter. If you are talking to a Robert Pattinson on twitter, note that it is a FAKE Robert Pattinson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrida1220 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

This is also confirmed via http://truthtweet.com/twitter-details-for-robert-pattinson/ ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 12:30, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit Request

I wanted to request to edit Robert Pattinson's filmography section. Robert Pattinson has won over 9 awards and has gained numerous nominations. None of that are on his profile. I was wondering if I can be granted permission to edit his page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trishstar7 (talk • contribs) 22:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC) {{editsemiprotected}}

Congratulations, Trishstar7!! That edit was you're 10th edit and you can now edit semi-protected pages yourself. although you may want to take a look at the biographies of living persons policy to make sure that your edits comply with it. Happy Editing!! Set Sail For The Seven Seas 335° 3' 0" NET 22:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit Request

I wanted to request to edit Robert Pattinson's personal life. He was named one of People's sexiest men alive for 2009. Glamour UK's most power man and etc. I would also like to request to put a new picture of Robert Pattinson from the New Moon premiere. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trishstar7 (talk • contribs) 23:16, February 7, 2010 (UTC) {{editsemiprotected}}

You don't need to put this on here before making an edit. Feel free to edit the page yourself. Before changing the pic, discuss it here. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 23:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Also, we can only use images found at commons:Category:Robert Pattinson. I oppose the change, I feel the image we have now is fine. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 23:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Indeed, see the boldness guideline. Also, remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) so that other users know who is commenting. :) Set Sail For The Seven Seas 351° 15' 30" NET 23:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

My friend told me that Robert have a baby with Kristen Stewart. Is it truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.144.154.37 (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No, thats not true, it was a pregnancy rumour once that way quickly discouraged. --WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Who changed his birth year?

WHo changed it to 1986? Before it said that he was born in 1978, which seems correct. Who changed it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas100000 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Our source says he says 23, I have the utmost doubt that he is 30 anyway. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 01:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

he is a capricorn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.40.218 (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Seriously guys! I saw the page and it said 1978, I though for sure that someone had vandalized it. NO LIE! It said he was born May 13, 1978.Thomas100000 (talk) 22:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, his Wikipedia article did say he was born in 1978. This was apparently vandalism and was reverted about a week ago. Template:Scarce signature. 22:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson did NOT confirm he is dating Kristen Stewart

According to Gossip Cop, the SUN reporter lied about Robert Pattinson admitting anything. This is FALSE and here is the article. ROBERT PATTINSON NEVER SAID HE WAS DATING KRISTEN STEWART. Confirmed. http://www.gossipcop.com/robert-pattinson-never-said-kristen-stewart-couple-sun/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trishstar7 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

"Gossip Cop" is not a reliable source. However, The Sun has been proven wrong on numerous occasions. I say we remove it until more reliable sources can be found. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 03:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, need a better source if we're to use this at all. Also keep in mind that wikipedia is not a tabloid so we don't have to keep track of every time a celebrity goes on a date. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

This has been such a highly publicized "romance" though and "Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart" are the top searches on Google for the both of them. They are also co-stars in four films. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 04:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

In accordance to WP:BLP, the statements should remain removed until either of them confirm this to a reliable source. ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 04:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Empire Awards

Rob is nominated for an Empire Award in the Category Best Actor for New Moon. In 2009 he was also nominated as Best Newcomer for Twilight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.247.84.184 (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Could you give us a source for that info? Andrea (talk) 16:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

 Added ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 18:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson to join Madame Tussauds

Hollywood’s hottest leading man to take starring role at Madame Tussauds London http://www.madametussauds.com/London/NewsAndEvents/RobertPattinsonAnnounce/ Rob remembers (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)rob_remembers

Its been added into the personal life section.--WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

RAZZIE NOMINATION

shoulnt we put his worst supporting actor category there?????and wtf is the thing on the very top of the page???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.239.238 (talk) 07:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

 Added and  Fixed –Scarce ✉ 09:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Robert Pattinson hates Twilight

Should be added to the page: http://www.eonline.com/videos/v36324_Pattinson_Preps_for__Twilight__Takeover.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by NCLI (talk • contribs) 13:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

That link doesnt go anywhere in particular and im not sure, but i dont think that E! is a trusted source...?-WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 18:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

He's Catholic

http://www.atwilightkiss.com/robert-pattinson-is-a-catholic-who-believes-in-abstinence.html

You that's right you add this to his locked page if you like him.

i dont think its quite enough of a source, correct me someone if im wrong, but the nature of it sounded more like sarcasm...i dont know if its a serious enough quote to certify it. --WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Dragon Ball: Reborn

Apparently he's going to act as Radditz (or so they say)...121.91.109.237 (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

You need some kind of source --WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Filmography

Who changed Robert Pattinson's filmography? Robert Pattinson is confirmed to doing Water For Elephants at the end of this May, and he is confirmed to doing The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, confirmed by Summit Entertainment. He is also scheduled to doing Unbound Captives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trishstar7 (talk • contribs)

Nobody said that he isn't confirmed for these roles. By all means mention it in the text of the article, but filmographies are not meant to tell the future. Per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF, we don't add films to an actor's filmography until it is very likely that the film will be made: so once principal photography begins. If filming for Water For Elephants starts at the end of May, then we will add it to his filmography at the end of May. Andrea (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

People magazine

Under PERSONAL LIFE it says 'People Magazine magazine' can someone take the second 'magazine' out? It not necessary, and also a load of the sentences in that section can be merged to make it look less stop-start, as most are awards from same years. There's so many of them a seperate section may even serve well, although that wont leave much in personal life. Its just a cleanup act and a suggestion, but i dont have the editing authorisation to do it myself. And also, the Time Magazine top 100... award is in the starter paragraph and the personal life section. Does it need to be repeated, or be in the starter? --Stripy Socks (talk) 09:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)