Talk:Countess Palatine Eleonora Catherine of Zweibrücken: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Princess of Sweden == |
== Princess of Sweden == |
||
{{3O}} |
|||
The claim that she was given the title princess of Sweden when her brother became king, was added to this article without any sources at all. This is evident by looking at the edit history of the article. Because of this reason, it is the task of those who which to keep this information to provide sources, not the other way around.--[[Special:Contributions/85.226.41.245|85.226.41.245]] ([[User talk:85.226.41.245|talk]]) 21:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC) |
The claim that she was given the title princess of Sweden when her brother became king, was added to this article without any sources at all. This is evident by looking at the edit history of the article. Because of this reason, it is the task of those who which to keep this information to provide sources, not the other way around.--[[Special:Contributions/85.226.41.245|85.226.41.245]] ([[User talk:85.226.41.245|talk]]) 21:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:I didn't add that, but you added info that is unsourced and it is up to you to source it. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 22:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC) |
:I didn't add that, but you added info that is unsourced and it is up to you to source it. [[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 22:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::The fact that her sister, Maria Eufrosyne, was given the title Princess of Sweden in 1654, is evident from her article, were it seems to have been from the beginning. This information has not been in the article of Eleonora originally, but was added without being sourced. You have not added this information, but you are now protecting it despite the fact that it is un-sourced. What I have done in this article, was reverting un-sourced claims with support of the sourced claims in the article of her sister. You have been insisting that the un-sourced claims remain, and that I have been adding un-referenced claims. Therefore, You are in fact more likely to have broken RFC. I am well aware of the fact that we have been in disagreement before regarding several articles. The fact that we have had different wievs, does not mean that I am a troll. The fact that I have edited from different IP adresses, does not mean that I am a troll. The IP on my computer changes all the time. I believe it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being trols. I also beleive, that it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being disruptive. I have found nothing in my behaviour here to varrant such accusations. I therefore welcome a third oppinion. --[[Special:Contributions/85.226.47.210|85.226.47.210]] ([[User talk:85.226.47.210|talk]]) 10:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC) |
::The fact that her sister, Maria Eufrosyne, was given the title Princess of Sweden in 1654, is evident from her article, were it seems to have been from the beginning. This information has not been in the article of Eleonora originally, but was added without being sourced. You have not added this information, but you are now protecting it despite the fact that it is un-sourced. What I have done in this article, was reverting un-sourced claims with support of the sourced claims in the article of her sister. You have been insisting that the un-sourced claims remain, and that I have been adding un-referenced claims. Therefore, You are in fact more likely to have broken RFC. I am well aware of the fact that we have been in disagreement before regarding several articles. The fact that we have had different wievs, does not mean that I am a troll. The fact that I have edited from different IP adresses, does not mean that I am a troll. The IP on my computer changes all the time. I believe it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being trols. I also beleive, that it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being disruptive. I have found nothing in my behaviour here to varrant such accusations. I therefore welcome a third oppinion. --[[Special:Contributions/85.226.47.210|85.226.47.210]] ([[User talk:85.226.47.210|talk]]) 10:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::In an attempt to solwe this issue in a civil manner, I have no asked for a third oppinion. It may be better to invite a neutral party, if the discussion is s heated as I have come to understand from your language. --[[Special:Contributions/85.226.47.210|85.226.47.210]] ([[User talk:85.226.47.210|talk]]) 10:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:53, 9 May 2010
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Biography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Sweden Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Eleonora Katarina av Pfalz from sv.wikipedia. |
Princess of Sweden
This template must be substituted. The claim that she was given the title princess of Sweden when her brother became king, was added to this article without any sources at all. This is evident by looking at the edit history of the article. Because of this reason, it is the task of those who which to keep this information to provide sources, not the other way around.--85.226.41.245 (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't add that, but you added info that is unsourced and it is up to you to source it. SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- You have been disrespectful in edit-warring and putting that unsourced claim of yours back in without a source. I will reverse it tomorrow unless you do it now, and if you put it in again without a source, I will open an RFC on you for disruptive editing. SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- And while I am at it I will request an IP investigation, since you seem to be doing such provocative editing from various different IP addresses which can be traced. Such behavior is called trolling I believe. SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that her sister, Maria Eufrosyne, was given the title Princess of Sweden in 1654, is evident from her article, were it seems to have been from the beginning. This information has not been in the article of Eleonora originally, but was added without being sourced. You have not added this information, but you are now protecting it despite the fact that it is un-sourced. What I have done in this article, was reverting un-sourced claims with support of the sourced claims in the article of her sister. You have been insisting that the un-sourced claims remain, and that I have been adding un-referenced claims. Therefore, You are in fact more likely to have broken RFC. I am well aware of the fact that we have been in disagreement before regarding several articles. The fact that we have had different wievs, does not mean that I am a troll. The fact that I have edited from different IP adresses, does not mean that I am a troll. The IP on my computer changes all the time. I believe it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being trols. I also beleive, that it is important to be able to disagree without accusing each other of being disruptive. I have found nothing in my behaviour here to varrant such accusations. I therefore welcome a third oppinion. --85.226.47.210 (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- In an attempt to solwe this issue in a civil manner, I have no asked for a third oppinion. It may be better to invite a neutral party, if the discussion is s heated as I have come to understand from your language. --85.226.47.210 (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)