Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 21

May 21

File:Glacierparklodge.jpeg

File:Glacierparklodge.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image comes from http://www.city-data.com/picfilesc/picc35824.php and the names do not match, nor the "date" match the metadata. This user has uploaded a variety of copyvios claiming they made them, but I think they are confused and equate "author" with "downloader". Aboutmovies (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Sri menanti muar.jpg

File:Sri menanti muar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader has a long history of uploading copyright violations and is currently blocked indef for doing so. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:GEDC0686.JPG

File:GEDC0686.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Likely a derivative work of a copyrighted photograph. The uploader has done the same for File:Newyoungdivas2007.jpg, File:Emily001.jpg, File:GEDC0690.JPG, File:Youngdivasonstage.jpg, File:Youngdivassing.jpg and File:Paulini2007.jpg. Bidgee (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

---

Image found on http://www.ozfiji.com and has been tagged as a copyright violation. Bidgee (talk) 09:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC) Template:Puf bottom

File:AmravatiUniversity1.jpg

File:AmravatiUniversity1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Watermarks in image don't match up with the uploaders details Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Harrygregg.png

File:Harrygregg.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image seems to have been copied from http://smb100.org/menu.php or some other website. The uploader claims that he is the copyright owner, but he hasn't provided any evidence, and one of the photographs was taken 40-60 years ago. Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:10, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Delete it as i'm not exactly sure what copyright fits it. The image is used on several unconnected websites and is essentially the combining together of two different pictures that are used on more unrelated websites. Seeing as the picture and its component pictures are being used by various different sites - what do i select as its copyright?? Mabuska (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

You need to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Uploading images. First of all, you need to state where both of the images come from and what their copyright status is. If they are not released under a free license (which they most likely aren't), then you need to include a fair-use rationale and an image copyright tag on the description page. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Vijay Actor.jpg

File:Vijay Actor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has been copied from http://www.chennaivision.com/newsdetails.php?id=2336, and there's no evidence that User:Epabhith is the copyright owner of the photo. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:PICASSO Le pigeon aux petits pois 1911.jpg

File:PICASSO Le pigeon aux petits pois 1911.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There's been a slow edit war over a tag on this and I think it merits wider discussion. I believe the argument is that there is no evidence of publication before 1923 as opposed to creation. I have no opinion on the matter, but I think it's worth a discussion... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
• I could be kept as a nonfree image if the resolution is reduced. For us to keep the high-res version we need evidence of publication (i.e. distribution of copies to the public) before 1923. Right now there's no evidence of when it was published. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. The standard is publication or public presentation. Picasso already had a great artistic stature in 1911. It is inconceivable that this work (one of his most famous) would not have been exhibited until 1923 (cf. Chicago Picasso). IronGargoyle (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

File:File:Ucb theatre.jpg

File:Ucb theatre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Removing a photo I took. Olv 26 (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)