Jump to content

User talk:1234r00t: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Riri145 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Riri145 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 89: Line 89:


Can you explain why you reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Divergence&diff=367093813&oldid=367093740 this edit]? It seems helpful to me. Please note that the editor you reverted is a student newbie, and they are likely to be confused by your edit, if it is not explained on their talk. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Can you explain why you reverted [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Divergence&diff=367093813&oldid=367093740 this edit]? It seems helpful to me. Please note that the editor you reverted is a student newbie, and they are likely to be confused by your edit, if it is not explained on their talk. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 17:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

== Candidate for deletion? ==


Which of my articles is being potentially deleted and why? I haven't really created any articles; I'm just redirecting. [[User:Riri145|Riri145]] ([[User talk:Riri145|talk]]) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Which of my articles is being potentially deleted and why? I haven't really created any articles; I'm just redirecting. [[User:Riri145|Riri145]] ([[User talk:Riri145|talk]]) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:37, 11 June 2010

  • Please replace {{Wikipedia:WikiOgre/topicon}} with {{WikiOgre}}
Leave me a message Or send me an email.
Mr. R00t in Wikimedia projects
Commons Wikimedia
meta
Wikipedia
(en)
Wikipedia
(ro)
Wikipedia
(es)
Wikipedia
(de)
Sandbox


Current Vandalism level

Great, more work for all of us anti-vandals ;)


Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Level 3
Level 3

Moderate to high level of vandalism

[viewpurgeupdate]


5.48 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 11:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 1234r00t. You have new messages at Malinaccier's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
decltype (talk) 03:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Can I ask why you've marked this article for speedy deletion?

It's just if you look back in the history you'll see that the article has simply suffered severe vandalism. If you revert back to around the 29 April the vandalism should be put right.

Is there another reason that you requested speedy deletion? --5 albert square (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but when I look through the history it only shows 3 edits before I got involved. I will check it out again and possibly request protection for it. Mr. R00t Leave me a Message 01:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I did think about just removing the speedy deletion template but I know that rollbackers don't put it there light heartedly so thought I would ask in case there was something I'd missed :). I'm not entirely sure that it's worthy of it's own article and it certainly needs re-written! --5 albert square (talk) 20:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for respecting our tender feelings... :) I thought about changing the template to CSD for unambiguous person or place. Decided that with rewriting it could be saved. May go to one of those wiki-projects that specialize in saving this type of thing. Let me know if anything like what happened with the vandalism happens again and I'll get it protected. Mr. R00t Leave me a Message 22:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I might add it to my list of articles to improve. I normally try to keep the list to The Bill characters and actors, EastEnders characters and actors and things to do with Edinburgh, but I'm going to make an exception in this case as I think this will be a nice easy article. I'm sure there's other schools on Wikipedia with better articles that I can use as a rough guideline! --5 albert square (talk) 22:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Might also want to add some sources. Mr. R00t Leave me a Message 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Olivier

look at Chronology of stage, film and television performances given by Laurence Olivier 1920 not 1926 82.12.185.189 (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How could he have been working at 13? Mr. R00t Leave me a Message 01:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am not the writer of Chronology of stage, film and television performances given by Laurence Olivier so he was 13 in 1920 of The Taming of the Shrew at All Saints School82.12.185.189 (talk) 01:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska

My changes to the Nebraska Cornhuskers page are both factual and in compliance with Wikipedia standards. If you are the one indicating that Nebraska is a part of the BigTen, then you are both premature and incorrect. Until Nebraska FORMALLY ACCEPTS BigTen membership, you are both deceptive and uninformed in claiming them a part of the BigTen Conference. If you want to speculate about their accepting the invitation, please comment on ESPN, NOT on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ycpguy82 (talkcontribs) 00:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why the revert?

Can you explain why you reverted this edit? It seems helpful to me. Please note that the editor you reverted is a student newbie, and they are likely to be confused by your edit, if it is not explained on their talk. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for deletion?

Which of my articles is being potentially deleted and why? I haven't really created any articles; I'm just redirecting. Riri145 (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]