Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 121.72.27.210 - "" |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The article is seriously incomplete, and it is hard to find descriptions of her anti-trans politics which meet the standards of BLP and RS. [[User:Marja Erwin|Marja Erwin]] ([[User talk:Marja Erwin|talk]]) 04:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC) |
The article is seriously incomplete, and it is hard to find descriptions of her anti-trans politics which meet the standards of BLP and RS. [[User:Marja Erwin|Marja Erwin]] ([[User talk:Marja Erwin|talk]]) 04:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
It's 'incomplete' in more ways than one. The lead contains a long sentence saying that 'many feminists' disagree with Raymond on trans issues, but missing is any acknowledgement that some feminists indeed agree with Raymond. Is that fair or NPOV? NO. |
|||
== Biased editing at [[Janice Raymond]] == |
== Biased editing at [[Janice Raymond]] == |
Revision as of 02:05, 17 June 2010
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Gender studies and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
I need the help of an administrator!!I need the help of an administrator on an article involving a women's health issue. A male doctor is deleting the info provided by female doctors. If there is an administrator who can help, please contact me Drzuckerman 02:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Possessive Terminology?I'm not sure how using the terms wife/husband is necessarily possessive. It's noun describing a relationship. If I'm someone's sibling, parent or friend, I am not their property. Why does marriage necessarily indicate ownership? Certainly, the expression "man and wife" does suggest ownership, but "husband and wife" (or "husband and husband" for that matter) does not, does it? - TheMightyQuill 22:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not as far off the guide as you might think Neitherday, when I said ""styling" or characterizing of a subject tends towards POV because it does not focus on the subject's own notability" I am including "referring to someone as the wife of (or husband of)". In the line: "A is married to B" such a POV or privelaging does not take place - that in my interpretation is the essence of the guideline. Just a BTW the gudielines have been moved to a new department for "countering systemic gender bias"--Cailil 13:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Gender studies page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 60 days ![]() |
Template:WikiProject Gender Studies Navigation
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:11, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
sexism at New York Times and the WP article
We're discussing whether a history of sex discrimination at the N.Y. Times respecting reporters and editors is notable enough for the article on The New York Times. I put it in, someone took it out by reverting, and now we're debating restoration. Please feel free to weigh in. Thank you. Nick Levinson (talk) 00:26, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Thank you. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Need expertise for the Janice Raymond article
The article is seriously incomplete, and it is hard to find descriptions of her anti-trans politics which meet the standards of BLP and RS. Marja Erwin (talk) 04:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
It's 'incomplete' in more ways than one. The lead contains a long sentence saying that 'many feminists' disagree with Raymond on trans issues, but missing is any acknowledgement that some feminists indeed agree with Raymond. Is that fair or NPOV? NO.
Biased editing at Janice Raymond
There appears to be a problem of biased editing at this article. I think the way it is written now is not in accord with NPOV or BLP. There is a biased sentence in the lead: "She has also written extensively about transsexualism, and her views on transgender have met with great controversy, as they are viewed by many as transphobic." That's biased because it presents only criticism of Raymond and does not indicate that many feminists AGREE with her views on trans issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.27.210 (talk) 02:01, 17 June 2010 (UTC)