Jump to content

Talk:Soliton (optics): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Drnathanfurious - ""
Line 6: Line 6:


=Problem with Solition Picture=
=Problem with Solition Picture=
The picture by [[User:Alejo2083|Alessio Damato]] doesn't correspond with the text. The text states that higher frequency components travel faster (spatially) than lower ones in the case of GVD, and the opposite for Kerr nonlinearities. However, the picture shows the opposite. For normal dispersion the index of refraction decreases with wavelength, so the velocity of a wave <math>v=c_0/n</math> should be faster for higher frequencies than lower frequencies (as in the text). I have modified the image, and will upload unless anyone can show I am wrong. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Drnathanfurious|Drnathanfurious]] ([[User talk:Drnathanfurious|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drnathanfurious|contribs]]) 14:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The picture by [[User:Alejo2083|Alessio Damato]] doesn't correspond with the text. The text states that higher frequency components travel faster (spatially) than lower ones in the case of GVD, and the opposite for Kerr nonlinearities. However, the picture shows the opposite. For normal dispersion the index of refraction decreases with wavelength, so the velocity of a wave <math>v=c_0/n</math> should be slower for higher frequencies. Will adjust article to match this. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Drnathanfurious|Drnathanfurious]] ([[User talk:Drnathanfurious|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Drnathanfurious|contribs]]) 14:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 14:18, 20 June 2010

WikiProject iconPhysics B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElectronics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

B-class

I've tagged this article as B-class because it nees cleanup for encyclopedic tone. The current text is a mix of conversational tone, for example starting a sentence with "anyway", and textbook or journal-article tone, mainly in the large amount of equations relative to text. -- The Photon 03:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Solition Picture

The picture by Alessio Damato doesn't correspond with the text. The text states that higher frequency components travel faster (spatially) than lower ones in the case of GVD, and the opposite for Kerr nonlinearities. However, the picture shows the opposite. For normal dispersion the index of refraction decreases with wavelength, so the velocity of a wave should be slower for higher frequencies. Will adjust article to match this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drnathanfurious (talkcontribs) 14:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]