Talk:Lee Rhiannon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:45, 16 August 2010

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Politics Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lee Rhiannon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Redaction of son's name

I redacted personal information about Rhiannon's son as recommended by Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Privacy_of_names. The movement of the paragraph to a new section "Controversies" is a bit inappropriate, but there was no other "current events" detail like this in the article which it could be grouped under. I tend to think that the information is not noteworthy as it is about a non-notable separate adult (albeit her son), but it is referenced so I have left it for now with personal information redacted. Sambauers (talk) 06:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed it and suggest it not be replaced, this article is about Lee not her son, it is coat-racking to add it here, if her son is notable (which he isn't) then create an article about him. Off2riorob (talk) 12:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Balance?

This article reads like an advertisement for Lee Rhiannon. Negative issues are suspiciously absent for a public figure.

No mention that:

Her mother was a prominent Stalinist, and one of the CPA members who left in 1971 to form the SPA since the CPA was criticising the Soviet Union, specifically the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia.

Lee was not an innocent victim of ASIO - she was a self-avowed "revolutionary".

Lee herself joined the Stalinist SPA, and was active in it until the 1980's. Her support of the Soviet Union was never in doubt - she "aggressively praised" endorsement of Moscow’s invasion of Czechoslovakia.

Despite being in the Greens, she almost never talks about environmental issues.

Article here: http://www.thesydneyinstitute.com.au/wordpress/?p=455 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.68.54 (talk • contribs) u

Take your anonymous bias elsewhere. There is no source for any of your claims (and no, the article you link to is not reliable). Sambauers (talk) 06:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:33, 14 August 2010 edit Routier1642 (talk \| contribs) 4 edits →‎Lack of Balance? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:45, 16 August 2010 edit undo Sambauers (talk \| contribs) 261 edits →‎Lack of Balance? Next edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Article here: http://www.thesydneyinstitute.com.au/wordpress/?p=455 {{Unsigned\|60.240.68.54}}u		Article here: http://www.thesydneyinstitute.com.au/wordpress/?p=455 {{Unsigned\|60.240.68.54}}u

			:Take your anonymous bias elsewhere. There is no source for any of your claims (and no, the article you link to is not reliable). [[User:Sambauers\|Sambauers]] ([[User talk:Sambauers\|talk]]) 06:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)