Jump to content

User talk:Harrybarb: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Harrybarb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Harrybarb (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:


:::::::::Obvulusly I noticed an account named "Bonkers189", and reported it for Sockpuppet investigations, however, another user changed it to "Checkuser", and thats how all of these are blocked. I am now done here. --[[User:Harrybarb|Harrybarb]] ([[User talk:Harrybarb#top|talk]]) 19:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::::::Obvulusly I noticed an account named "Bonkers189", and reported it for Sockpuppet investigations, however, another user changed it to "Checkuser", and thats how all of these are blocked. I am now done here. --[[User:Harrybarb|Harrybarb]] ([[User talk:Harrybarb#top|talk]]) 19:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
{{help|Last help: Will there ever be any future Checkuser investigations for Googler459/Bonkers189 or not?}}

Revision as of 01:11, 1 September 2010

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harrybarb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Now that I am blocked as a sockpuppet, how do I get unblocked (even if I have to use Googler459 to get unblocked)?

Decline reason:

this account is a check-user confirmed sock of Googler459. Any unblock request should be made for that account, on its talk page; but read WP:GAB first. JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harrybarb (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have used the correct username and password to log on to Googler459, but it still says "Invalid username or password." If however I can't access it to log on and e-mall in the future, what will I have to do to have the Checkuser block lifted in the future?

Decline reason:

See my comments below  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 18:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have used the correct password and username for my account, but I still can't acess it.

  • Harry, I'm not sure what you're asking here. I can see you're logged in, because the edit history for this page shows that you're editing under your username and not an IP address. What account are you trying to log into? Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:30, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but if you've lost or forgotten the password, there's absolutely nothing that can be done about it as you haven't got an email address registered to that account. I can only suggest reposting an unblock request for this account, or whichever one of your many accounts you want to use that you can still log into, stating the following:
  • The reason you thought it necessary to create so many accounts
  • That you have read and understand WP:SOCK
  • That you will, in future, only use one account, for constructive purposes only.
There is also the issue of vandalism that you made from User:Camelfort. You will also need to explain that in your unblock request. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 18:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it OK if I use one of the previously blocked Bonkers189 accounts to place an unblock request, such as Quoladdie, or do I have to use another account? Tivedshambolo suggests that I should post another unblock request here, or in any other account. --Harrybarb (talk) 18:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Decide which account you want to edit from in future, and request that that account only is unblocked. Point to this discussion, and stop using this account. To be honest, however, given your history of vandalism, I would not hold out much hope of getting much sympathy. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will use the Quoladdie account to request an unblock. I am done with this account. Do I still have to use this talk page and ask more questions, or can I stop using this account and wait and request the unblock on that talk page? --Harrybarb (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Log out of this account, into that one, and make your requests there. You should stop using this account now. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Harry, I'm just completely baffled by what you're actually trying to do here. User:Quoladdie is an account that you reported for sock-puppetry yourself. Now you say you want to use it. I cannot fathom out what your motives are here. But to answer your question, as I said before, make edits from only one account. This includes asking questions. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser confirmed this IP was used by multiple accounts. This IP is shared, so there are a few people that have randomly created one or more accounts. I am one of those people. However, I didn't know how many were created in a period of 4 years. I started editing Wikipedia in June 2009. I have created this list of users.
  • "Korkey" (joined June 12, 2009, blocked August 31, 2010, no time set)
  • "Catkitty45" {joined June 20, 2010, blocked August 31, 2010, no time set)
  • "Harrybarb (joined August 28, 2010, blocked August 31, 2010, no time set)
Obvulusly I noticed an account named "Bonkers189", and reported it for Sockpuppet investigations, however, another user changed it to "Checkuser", and thats how all of these are blocked. I am now done here. --Harrybarb (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last help: Will there ever be any future Checkuser investigations for Googler459/Bonkers189 or not?