Jump to content

Eta Carinae: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Obiwan042 (talk | contribs)
224 edits
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:


==Significance==
==Significance==
This stellar system is currently one of the most massive that can be studied in great detail. Until recently, Eta Carinae was thought to be the most massive single star, but it was recently demoted to a binary system.<ref name=massive/> The most massive star in the Eta Carinae multiple star system has less than 100 times the mass of the Sun. Other known massive stars are [[List of most luminous stars|more luminous]] and [[List of most massive stars|more massive]].
This stellar system is no longer one of the most massive volcanoes that can be studied in great detail. Until recently, Eta Carinae was thought to be the most massive single star, but it was recently demoted to a crappy irrevelavent star. but dont be ffoled thiss star could errupt at any moment. i encourage any one lucky enough to be reading this...too take action right away. i recommend going into hiding..or maybe drowning yourself could be the only way to die a pleasant death.anything but this awful fate..<ref name=massive/> The most massive star in the Eta Carinae multiple star system has less than 100 times the mass of the Sun. Other known massive stars are [[List of most luminous stars|more luminous]] and [[List of most massive stars|more massive]].


Stars in the mass class of Eta Carinae, with more than 100 times the mass of the Sun, produce more than a million times as much light as the Sun. They are quite rare — only a few dozen in a galaxy as big as the [[Milky Way]]. They are assumed to approach (or potentially exceed) the [[Eddington limit]], i.e., the outward pressure of their radiation is almost strong enough to counteract gravity. Stars that are more than 120 solar masses exceed the theoretical Eddington limit, and their gravity is barely strong enough to hold in their radiation and gas.
Stars in the mass class of Eta Carinae, with more than 100 times the mass of the Sun, produce more than a million times as much light as the Sun. They are quite rare — only a few dozen in a galaxy as big as the [[Milky Way]]. They are assumed to approach (or potentially exceed) the [[Eddington limit]], i.e., the outward pressure of their radiation is almost strong enough to counteract gravity. Stars that are more than 120 solar masses exceed the theoretical Eddington limit, and their gravity is barely strong enough to hold in their radiation and gas.

Revision as of 11:45, 14 September 2010

Eta Carinae

Hubble Space Telescope image showing Eta Carinae and the bipolar Homunculus Nebula which surrounds the star. The Homunculus was partly created in an eruption of Eta Carinae, the light from which reached Earth in 1843. Eta Carinae itself appears as the white patch near the center of the image, where the 2 lobes of the Homunculus touch.
Observation data
Epoch J2000      Equinox J2000
Constellation Carina
Right ascension 10h 45m 03.591s[1]
Declination −59° 41′ 04.26″[1]
Apparent magnitude (V) 4.55 (July 2010) [2]
Characteristics
Spectral type WR pe
U−B color index -0.45
B−V color index 0.61
Variable type LBV binary or multiple star
Astrometry
Radial velocity (Rv)−25.0[1] km/s
Proper motion (μ) RA: −7.6[1] mas/yr
Dec.: 1.0[1] mas/yr
Absolute magnitude (MV)-5.45 to -5.74
Details
Mass100–150[3] M☉
Radius85–195 [4] R☉
Luminosity5 × 106(bolometric) L☉
Temperature36–40,000 K
Age~ <3 × 106 years
Other designations
Foramen, Tseen She, HR 4210, CD−59°2620, HD 93308, SAO 238429, WDS 10451-5941, IRAS 10431-5925, GC 14799, CCDM J10451-5941

Eta Carinae (η Carinae or η Car) is a stellar system in the constellation Carina, about 7,500 to 8,000 light-years from the Sun. The system contains at least two stars, one of which is a Wolf-Rayet star. Its combined luminosity is about four million times that of the Sun and has an estimated system mass in excess of 100 solar masses.[5] It is not visible north of latitude 30°N and is circumpolar south of latitude 30°S. Because of its mass and the stage of life, it is expected to explode in a supernova in the astronomically near future.

Eta Carinae has the traditional names Tseen She (from the Chinese 天社 (Mandarin: tiānshè) "Heaven's altar") and Foramen.

Significance

This stellar system is no longer one of the most massive volcanoes that can be studied in great detail. Until recently, Eta Carinae was thought to be the most massive single star, but it was recently demoted to a crappy irrevelavent star. but dont be ffoled thiss star could errupt at any moment. i encourage any one lucky enough to be reading this...too take action right away. i recommend going into hiding..or maybe drowning yourself could be the only way to die a pleasant death.anything but this awful fate..[6] The most massive star in the Eta Carinae multiple star system has less than 100 times the mass of the Sun. Other known massive stars are more luminous and more massive.

Stars in the mass class of Eta Carinae, with more than 100 times the mass of the Sun, produce more than a million times as much light as the Sun. They are quite rare — only a few dozen in a galaxy as big as the Milky Way. They are assumed to approach (or potentially exceed) the Eddington limit, i.e., the outward pressure of their radiation is almost strong enough to counteract gravity. Stars that are more than 120 solar masses exceed the theoretical Eddington limit, and their gravity is barely strong enough to hold in their radiation and gas.

Eta Carinae's chief significance for astrophysics is based on its giant eruption or supernova impostor event, which was observed around 1843. In a few years, Eta Carinae produced almost as much visible light as a supernova explosion, but it survived. Other supernova impostors have been seen in other galaxies, for example the false supernovae SN 1961v in NGC 1058[7] and SN 2006jc in NGC 4904,[8] which produced a false supernova, noted in October 2004. Significantly, SN 2006jc was destroyed in a supernova explosion two years later, observed on October 9, 2006.[9] The supernova impostor phenomenon may represent a surface instability[10] or a failed supernova. Eta Carinae's giant eruption was the prototype for this phenomenon, and after nearly 170 years the star's internal structure has not fully recovered.

Brightness variations

One remarkable aspect of Eta Carinae is its changing brightness. It is currently classified as a luminous blue variable (LBV) binary star due to peculiarities in its pattern of brightening and dimming.

When Eta Carinae was first catalogued in 1677 by Edmond Halley, it was of the 4th magnitude, but by 1730, observers noticed it had brightened considerably and was, at that point, one of the brightest stars in Carina. Subsequently it dimmed again and by 1782 it appeared to have reverted to its former obscurity. In 1820, it was observed growing in brightness again. By 1827, it had brightened more than tenfold and reached its greatest apparent brightness in April 1843. With a magnitude of −0.8, it was the second brightest star in the night-time sky (after Sirius at 8.6 light years away), despite its enormous distance of 7,000–8,000 light-years. (To put the relationship in perspective, the relative brightness would be like comparing a candle (representing Sirius) at 14.5 meters (48 feet) to another light source (Eta Carinae) about Template:Km to mi away, which would appear almost as bright as the candle.)

Eta Carinae sometimes has large outbursts, the last of which appeared in 1841, at around the time of its maximum brightness. The reason for these outbursts is not yet known. The most likely possibility is believed to be that they are caused by built-up radiation pressure from the star's enormous luminosity. After 1843, Eta Carinae's appearance faded away and between about 1900 and 1940 it was only of the 8th magnitude, invisible to the naked eye.[11] Eta Carinae's sudden and unexpected doubled brightness was seen in 1998–1999. In 2007, its light could easily be seen with the naked eye at brighter than magnitude 5.[12]

In 2008, the formerly clockwork regularity of the dimming was upset.[13] Following its 5.52-year cycle, the star would normally have started its next dimming appearance in January 2009, but the pattern was noticed starting early in July 2008 by the southern Gemini Observatory in La Serena, Chile. Spectrographic measurements showed an increase in blue light from superheated helium, which was formerly assumed to occur with the wind shock. However, if the cause is a binary star, it would be located too far away at this point in time for the wind to interact in so significant a fashion. There is some debate about the cause of the recent event.[13]

X-ray source

Classified as a peculiar star, Eta Carinae exhibits a superstar at its center as seen in this image from Chandra. The new X-ray observation shows three distinct structures: an outer, horseshoe-shaped ring about 2 light years in diameter, a hot inner core about 3 light-months in diameter, and a hot central source less than 1 light-month in diameter which may contain the superstar that is responsible for the Homunculus nebula. The outer ring provides evidence of another large explosion that occurred over 1,000 years ago. Credit: Chandra Science Center and NASA.

4U 1037-60 (A 1044-59) is Eta Carinae. Three structures around Eta Carinae are thought to represent shock waves produced by matter rushing away from the superstar at supersonic speeds. The temperature of the shock-heated gas ranges from 60 MK in the central regions to 3 MK on the horseshoe-shaped outer structure. "The Chandra image contains some puzzles for existing ideas of how a star can produce such hot and intense X-rays," says Prof. Kris Davidson of the University of Minnesota.[14]

A "spectroscopic minimum", or "X-ray eclipse", appeared in 2003. Astronomers organized a large observing campaign which included every available ground-based (e.g. CCD optical photometry[12]) and space observatory, including major observations with the Hubble Space Telescope, the Chandra X-ray Observatory, the INTEGRAL Gamma-ray space observatory, and the Very Large Telescope. Primary goals of these observations were to determine if, in fact, Eta Carinae is a binary star and, if so, to identify its companion star; to determine the physical mechanism behind the "spectroscopic minima"; and to understand their relation (if any) to the large-scale eruptions of the 19th century.

There is good agreement between the X-ray light curve and the evolution of a wind-wind collision zone of a binary system. These results were complemented by new tests on radio wavelengths.[15]

Spectrographic monitoring of Eta Carinae[16] showed that some emission lines faded every 5.52 years, and that this period was stable for decades. The star's radio emission,[17] along with its X-ray brightness,[18] also drop precipitously during these "events" as well. These variations, along with ultra-violet variations, suggest a high probability that Eta Carinae is actually a binary star in which a hot, lower-mass star revolves around η Carinae in a 5.52-year, highly eccentric elliptical orbit.[6]

The ionizing radiation emitted by the secondary star in Eta Carinae is the major radiation source of the system. Much of this radiation is absorbed by the primary stellar wind, mainly after it encounters the secondary wind and passes through a shock wave. The amount of absorption depends on the compression factor of the primary wind in the shock wave. The compression factor is limited by the magnetic pressure in the primary wind.[19] The variation of the absorption by the post-shock primary wind with orbital phase changes the ionization structure of the circumbinary gas, and can account for the radio light curve of Eta Carinae. Fast variations near periastron passage are attributed to the onset of the accretion phase.

Future prospects

Carina nebula (NGC 3372) containing Eta Carinae. Eta Carinae and its surrounding Homunculus Nebula are the small, saturated (white) blob centered vertically in the image and approximately 1/5 of the distance from left to right. Photograph by the Hubble Space Telescope.

Because of their disproportionately high luminosities, very large stars such as Eta Carinae use up their fuel very quickly. Eta Carinae is expected to explode as a supernova or hypernova some time within the next million years or so. As its current age and evolutionary path are uncertain, however, it could explode within the next several millennia or even in the next few years. LBVs such as Eta Carinae may be a stage in the evolution of the most massive stars; the prevailing theory now holds that they will exhibit extreme mass loss and become Wolf-Rayet stars before they go supernova, if they are unable to hold their mass to explode as a hypernova.[20]

More recently, another possible Eta Carinae analogue was observed — namely SN 2006jc, some 77 million light years away in UGC 4904, in the constellation of Lynx.[21] Its brightened appearance was noted on 20 October 2004, and was reported by amateur astronomer Koichi Itagaki as a supernova. However, although it had indeed exploded, hurling 0.01 solar masses (~20 Jupiters) of material into space, it had survived, before finally exploding nearly two years later as a Mag 13.8 type Ib supernova, seen on 9 October 2006. Its earlier brightening was a supernova impostor event.

Due to the similarity between Eta Carinae and SN 2006jc, Stefan Immler of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center suggests that Eta Carinae could explode in our lifetime or even in the next few years. However, Stanford Woosley of the University of California in Santa Cruz disagrees with Immler’s suggestion, and says it is likely that Eta Carinae is at an earlier stage of evolution, and that it still has several kinds of material left for nuclear fusion.

In NGC 1260, a spiral galaxy in the constellation of Perseus some 238 million light years from earth, another analogue star explosion was supernova SN 2006gy, observed on September 18, 2006. A number of astronomers modeling supernova events have suggested that the explosion mechanism for SN 2006gy may be very similar to the fate that awaits Eta Carinae.

One theory of Eta Carinae's ultimate fate.
Drawing of a massive star collapsing to form a black hole. Energy released as jets along the axis of rotation forms the gamma ray bursts.
Credit: Nicolle Rager Fuller/NSF

It is possible that the Eta Carinae hypernova or supernova, when it occurs, could affect Earth, about 7,500 light years away. It is unlikely, however, to affect terrestrial lifeforms directly, as they will be protected from gamma rays by the atmosphere, and from some other cosmic rays by the magnetosphere. The damage would likely be restricted to the upper atmosphere, the ozone layer, spacecraft, including satellites, and any astronauts in space, although a certain few[who?] claim that radiation damage to the upper atmosphere would have catastrophic effects as well. At least one scientist has claimed that when the star explodes, "it would be so bright that you would see it during the day, and you could even read a book by its light at night".[22] A supernova or hypernova produced by Eta Carinae would probably eject a gamma ray burst (GRB) out on both polar areas of its rotational axis. Calculations show that the deposited energy of such a GRB striking the Earth's atmosphere would be equivalent to one kiloton of TNT per square kilometer over the entire hemisphere facing the star with ionizing radiation depositing ten times the lethal whole body dose to the surface.[23] This catastrophic burst would probably not hit Earth, though, because the rotation axis does not currently point towards our solar system. If Eta Carinae is a binary system, this may affect the future intensity and orientation of the supernova explosion that it produces, depending on the circumstances.[6]

The luminous blue variable Eta Carinae taken with the NACO near-infrared adaptive optics instrument on ESOs Very Large Telescope. Credit ESO

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "SIMBAD query result: V* eta Car -- Variable Star". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 2008-04-25.—some of the data is located under "Measurements".
  2. ^ "Optical monitoring of Eta Carinae". Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Retrieved 2010-07-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ "Eta Carinae: New View of Doomed Star". Chandra X-ray Center. Retrieved 2008-04-25.
  4. ^ http://etacar.umn.edu/etainfo/basic/
  5. ^ Davidson, Kris and Roberta Humphreys (1997). Eta Carinae and its Environment. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 35: 1-32.
  6. ^ a b c Nancy Neal-Jones, Bill Steigerwald, "NASA Satellite Detects Massive Star Partner", NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 1 November 2005
  7. ^ Stockdale, Christopher J.; Rupen, Michael P.; Cowan, John J.; Chu, You-Hua; Jones, Steven S. (2001). "The fading radio emission from SN 1961v: evidence for a Type II peculiar supernova?". The Astronomical Journal. 122: 283. doi:10.1086/321136.
  8. ^ Robert Naeye, "Supernova Impostor Goes Supernova", NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 4 April 2007
  9. ^ Shiga, D. (2007). "Star's odd double explosion hints at antimatter trigger". New Scientist. 2598: 18. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(07)62628-1.
  10. ^ see various articles in R.M. Humphreys & K.Z. Stanek (eds.) (2005). "The Fate of the Most Massive Stars". ASP Conference 332. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. {{cite conference}}: |author= has generic name (help); Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ " Historical light curve"
  12. ^ a b Eduardo Fernández Lajús, "Optical observations of Eta Carinae at La Plata Observatory", Observatorio Astronómico de La Plata
  13. ^ a b Courtland, Rachel. "'Supernova impostor' begins to dim unexpectedly", NewScientist news service, 7 August 2008
  14. ^ "Chandra Takes X-ray Image of Repeat Offender".
  15. ^ Falceta-Gonçalves, D.; Jatenco-Pereira, V.; Abraham, Z. (2005). "Wind-wind collision in the η Carinae binary system: a shell-like event near periastron". MNRAS. 357: 895. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08682.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ Damineli, A. (1996). "The 5.52 Year Cycle of Eta Carinae". ApJ. 460: L49. doi:10.1086/309961.
  17. ^ Stephen White, "Radio outburst of Eta Carinae", Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland College Park
  18. ^ Michael Corcoran, "RXTE X-ray lightcurve", Goddard Space Flight Center, last updated 10 December 2008
  19. ^ Kashi, A.; Soker, N. (2007). "Modelling the Radio Light Curve of Eta Carinae". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 378: 1609. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11908.x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ Smith, Nathan; Owocki, Stanley P. (2006). "On the Role of Continuum-driven Eruptions in the Evolution of Very Massive Stars". The Astrophysical Journal. 645: L45. doi:10.1086/506523.
  21. ^ Robert S. (2007). "Massive star burps, then explodes". UC Berkeley News.
  22. ^ "Star dies in monstrous explosion", BBC News, 8 May 2007
  23. ^ Arnon Dar, A. De Rujula. "The threat to life from Eta Carinae and gamma ray bursts" Astrophysics and Gamma Ray Physics in Space, Series Vol. XXIV (2002), pp. 513-523

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Eta Carinae.

Template:Link GA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eta_Carinae&oldid=384768838"