Talk:Walnut oil: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:41, 22 September 2010

Food and drink Stub‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

This is obviously written from an opinionated standpoint rather than a factual one. It certainly needs a lot of work. ____________________________

I don't really get the whole... encylopedia thing to tell the truth. The articles I filled in were blank in the first place and I felt it would be better to fil them in a bit.

As for my opinion, I would rather have an opinion then to not have an opinion. To display ones opinion is human nature. To seperate oneself from opinion in order to reach a truth would be death. If you truley wish that, maybe you should follow Socrates words in his final discussion. Since the Gods he spoke of, for his argument against suicide, are obviously non-existent. I think you would be best following Silenus' words in Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy.

At least in death you could be with your purities and leave me and my article alone.

So there are your two options, suicide or fix the problem you complain of.

~capi crimm

Quite right Capi, there are places where it's just bizarre to leave out all opinion - which is doubtless one reason why Everything2's entry on walnut oil is obviously vastly superior to what we have here. Still: This is Wikipedia, the site where you come when you want content squeezed of all opinion and original thought, and that's the way it works - and, actually, for many things it works better than one might imagine. It just means Wikipedia is not the place to come for anything which calls for the least bit of passion - except for the arguments in the Talk pages, which are arguably among the finest on the Web! --Oolong 12:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caution?

May need a mention that food use can cause anaphylactic shock in a few sensitive people. 86.158.25.77 (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 :Quite right Capi, there are places where it's just bizarre to leave out all opinion - which is doubtless one reason why [http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1543693 Everything2's entry on walnut oil] is obviously ''vastly'' superior to what we have here. Still: This is Wikipedia, the site where you come when you want content squeezed of all opinion and original thought, and that's the way it works - and, actually, for many things it works better than one might imagine. It just means Wikipedia is not the place to come for anything which calls for the least bit of passion - except for the arguments in the Talk pages, which are arguably among the finest on the Web! --[[User:Oolong|Oolong]] 12:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
+== Caution? ==
+May need a mention that food use can cause anaphylactic shock in a few sensitive people. [[Special:Contributions/86.158.25.77|86.158.25.77]] ([[User talk:86.158.25.77|talk]]) 14:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)