User talk:AxiomOfFaith/Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, AxiomOfFaith! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! みんな空の下 (トーク) 04:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Secular humanism appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:44, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Education in the United States. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me to this (I honestly need to read some things a bit more) but I fail to see exactly what you are talking about in both cases. I always say, if a website is out of line with reality, then change the website, don't deny reality. I will revert those edits until this is resolved.--AxiomOfFaith (talk) 22:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, you already did.--AxiomOfFaith (talk) 22:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I liked your work at Second rout the Army Group Jiangnan- you definitely improved that article. The only problem edits I saw were all related to religion- just remind yourself, when editing in those subjects, of the differences between your own beliefs, those of the people you are writing about, and the verifiable facts, and I think you'll be fine. I like the way the existing article on Secular Humanism deals with the 'religion' angle- the lede phrasing makes it clear that most humanists think of themselves as a 'philosophy,' not a 'religion,' but the body of the article explores both how their critics have spoken of them and how the courts have ruled, which I think creates a fair balance. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I understand. Thank you for the clarification!--AxiomOfFaith (talk) 22:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit Warring on Secular Humanism

Please don't edit war. Per WP:BRD, when you make a change which is reverted by another editor, the next step is to discuss your change on the talk page. Re-reverting is combative, rather than collaborative, and can result in administrator intervention. Just hop in to the discussion page and express your concerns, and other editors are likely to contribute. Jess_talk|_edits 01:12, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

BCE vs BC

Per the manual of style I have reverted these 2 edits [1] and [2]. Please read this portion of the MoS, where among other things it says "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors." Heiro 21:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)