Talk:Max Payne 3

Removed Spoiler

Sentence was "It has been leaked that there will be full frontal male nudity in this game [during the scene which was a spoiler]." Add back in the part about nudity if you want, but the source linked confirmed neither the nudity nor what was described in this article as, presumably, Max Payne's ultimate fate in the game. 64.190.57.34 (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

It was vandalism. Rehevkor ✉ 13:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Sam Lake not involved?

What is the source of this? We know that Rememdy isnt involved because that's stated in the article but i have yet to see an article that say's for sure that Sam Lake isnt involved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.68.225 (talk) 16:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Until now, it's best to leave the [citation needed] beside that comment. 68.117.249.40 (talk) 20:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll need to go retrieve the magazine from the other room to cite sources, but it's Rockstar's sandbox now, no longer Remedy's. Incidentally, does anyone else kind of get a "Man On Fire" vibe from the game now? Atypicaloracle (talk) 01:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Without Sam Lake it won't be Max Payne. It'll probably be Niko Payneic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.86.22.193 (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

The picture for the infobox

See ru:File:Max Payne 3 art.jpg. It's better, than a simple logo ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by La Strategia Del Ragno (talk • contribs) 23:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, in my opinion, our simple logo is Bolder that Russians wiki, but their logo is sure cooler that ours!
I suggest to keep our logo since it's Bolder, and that's what Wikipedia wants from us, to be Bold N.samimi island (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Take-Two Annouce Delay

The game isn't coming out till fiscal 2010, which they say is the first half.--67.34.181.210 (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

It's actually now slated for a release at a date TBD Q4 2010. I think the infobox should be changed to reflect this for the North America release date, from "Q3 2010" as it currently says, to "Q4 2010", as it should be.98.209.57.0 (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if it's a reliable source, but Gamestop says it'll be releasing the game on 6/01/10.66.41.44.102 (talk) 03:48, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

It is not, alas, stores often lie/guess release dates to secure re-orders. Or something. Rehevkor ✉ 04:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Trailer received "positive" or "mixed" responses

I know I'm wasting my time writing here because no-one involved in editing the article is reading this, but I'm still gonna address the edit war that's going on here: The sources indicate that the teaser has been positively received, but I'm worried that user harshmaxpayne has ulterior motives for continuing to re-add this info. Given his user name, there is clearly a conflict of interest, and it shows; the user does not communicate and reverts any edits he does not like with no reason given. Harshmaxpayne, if you are reading this, please give a reason for your edits to avoid them being possibly being reverted any further. Eik Corell (talk) 04:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I've found it difficult to develop the article neutrally thanks to the above mentioned editor. Rehevkor ✉ 04:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

User Litis recently removed the section being discussed here. Thinking it over, I totally agree with their decision; It's unofficial, mentioning it in the way that we have thus far, doesn't serve the article in any meaningful way. What do you guys think? Eik Corell (talk) 04:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Maybe worth a mention, but not a whole section. Rehevkor ✉ 14:34, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

It's just some fake fan-made video. Check the description for the video on YouTube. And even if information on the game is scarce, this doesn't mean people should go around and add whatever fan-made bull they think looks the best. Litis (talk) 19:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree. It's gone and should stay gone. For what I'd worth I've reminded Mr Harshmaxpayne about our three revert rule so any further reverts can be considered simple edit warring and reported. Rehevkor ✉ 19:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

A good image for the game, When will the game on the market .--High Life High (talk) 22:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)