Supercarrier: Difference between revisions
m Reverted unexplained removal of content (HG) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The [[Soviet Union]]'s 85,000-ton nuclear carrier [[Soviet aircraft carrier Ulyanovsk|''Ulyanovsk'']], closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991, due to post-[[Cold War|Cold-War]] funding cuts. |
The [[Soviet Union]]'s 85,000-ton nuclear carrier [[Soviet aircraft carrier Ulyanovsk|''Ulyanovsk'']], closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991, due to post-[[Cold War|Cold-War]] funding cuts. |
||
The [[United States]] is no longer alone in building supercarriers, with the [[United Kingdom]] building two |
The [[United States]] is no longer alone in building supercarriers, with the [[United Kingdom]] building two 65,600-ton carriers [[Queen Elizabeth class]], and France [[Future French aircraft carrier|considering building one vessel]], possibly based on the same design. These ships are routinely referred to as supercarriers by [[legislator]]s<ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmordbk1/30908w01.htm House of Commons Written Questions for Answer, 8 September 2003]</ref><ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldhansrd/text/70315-0009.htm House of Lords, 15 March 2007].</ref><ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080617/text/80617w0014.htm House of Commons Written Answers for 17 June 2008]</ref><ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmscotaf/943/7071703.htm Select Committee on Scottish Affairs Minutes of Evidence, Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1–19), 17 July 2007]</ref> and the [[News media|media]].<ref name="supercarrier">{{Cite news| title = Hoon to confirm ‘supercarrier’| url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1401764.stm| publisher = [[BBC News]]|date= 2001-06-22| accessdate = 2008-12-23}}</ref><ref name="Go ahead">{{Cite news| title = Go-ahead given for work to start on supercarriers| url = http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/hands-off-our-base/Goahead-given-for-work-to.4099975.jp| work = [[The News (Portsmouth)|Portsmouth News]]|date=2008-05-20| accessdate = 2008-12-23}}</ref><ref name="VT">{{Cite news| title = VT at forefront of £3.9bn supercarrier project| url = http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/hands-off-our-base/VT-at-forefront-of-39bn.4100855.jp| work = [[The News (Portsmouth)|Portsmouth News]]| date=2008-05-20| accessdate = 2008-12-23}}</ref><ref name="Janes">{{Cite news| title = Navy (France), Navy Assessment | url = http://www.janes.com/articles/Janes-Sentinel-Security-Assessment-Western-Europe/Navy-France.html | publisher = '' Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment—Western Europe ''|date=2008-12-03| accessdate = 2008-12-28}}</ref><ref name="Delayed">{{Cite news| title = Navy aircraft carriers delayed| url = http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/3969255.Navy_aircraft_carriers_delayed/| work = [[The Northern Echo]] |date=2008-12-11| accessdate = 2008-12-23}}</ref><ref name="Job concerns">{{Cite news| title = Job concerns as MoD proposes carrier delay| url = http://www.thecourier.co.uk/output/2008/12/12/newsstory12371214t0.asp| work = [[The Courier]] |date=2008-12-12| accessdate = 2008-12-23}}</ref><ref name = "Airfix">{{Cite news| title = The £4billion Airfix Kit: Behind-the-scenes at Britain's biggest warships| url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1100714/The-4billion-Airfix-Kit-Behind-scenes-Britains-biggest-warships.html| work = [[Daily Mail]]|date= 2008-05-28| accessdate = 2008-12-28 | location=London | first=Damon | last=Syson}}</ref> The two [[Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier|''Queen Elizabeth'' class]] vessels will provide the [[Royal Navy]] with capabilities much closer to [[United States Navy]] carriers than its current [[Invincible class aircraft carrier|''Invincible'' class]] vessels. Giving evidence to the [[British House of Commons|House of Commons]] [[Defence Committee]], the [[First Sea Lord]] [[Admiral Sir Alan West]] explained that interoperability with the United States Navy was as much a deciding factor of the size of the carriers as the firepower of the carrier's airwing: |
||
{{bquote|I have talked with the CNO ([[Chief of Naval Operations]]) in [[United States|America]]. He is very keen for us to get these because he sees us slotting in with his carrier groups. He really wants us to have these, but he wants us to have the same sort of clout as one of their carriers.<ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmdfence/45/4112404.htm House of Commons Minutes of Evidence]</ref>}} |
{{bquote|I have talked with the CNO ([[Chief of Naval Operations]]) in [[United States|America]]. He is very keen for us to get these because he sees us slotting in with his carrier groups. He really wants us to have these, but he wants us to have the same sort of clout as one of their carriers.<ref>[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmdfence/45/4112404.htm House of Commons Minutes of Evidence]</ref>}} |
||
Revision as of 10:03, 25 October 2010
- This is about the warships. For the television program, see Supercarrier (TV series).
Supercarrier is an unofficial descriptive term for the largest type of aircraft carrier, usually displacing over 70,000 long tons.[1] The U.S. Navy currently has 11 such ships.[2] In comparison, a few countries operate medium carriers of around 40,000 tons (such as Charles de Gaulle), whereas light carriers closer to 20,000 tons (such as HMS Illustrious) are more typical. Supercarriers are the largest warships ever built.
History
The first ship to be described by The New York Times as a supercarrier was HMS Ark Royal in 1938;[3] with a length of 685 ft and a displacement of 22,000 tons, it was designed to carry 72 aircraft.[4][5] In 1943, the superlative was transferred to the 45,000-ton carriers of the Midway class, as a step-up from the 27,000-ton Essex class.[6] The post-war standard for supercarriers was set by the proposed USS United States and USS Forrestal.[7]
Forrestal displaced 60,000 tons standard, and 78,000 tons in deep load, when launched,[8] and is considered the first operational supercarrier in the present-day sense, as dubbed by the American press.[9] The similarly-sized United States would have been in service earlier, had it been completed; its cancellation triggered the "Revolt of the Admirals".
The Soviet Union's 85,000-ton nuclear carrier Ulyanovsk, closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991, due to post-Cold-War funding cuts.
The United States is no longer alone in building supercarriers, with the United Kingdom building two 65,600-ton carriers Queen Elizabeth class, and France considering building one vessel, possibly based on the same design. These ships are routinely referred to as supercarriers by legislators[10][11][12][13] and the media.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The two Queen Elizabeth class vessels will provide the Royal Navy with capabilities much closer to United States Navy carriers than its current Invincible class vessels. Giving evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee, the First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Alan West explained that interoperability with the United States Navy was as much a deciding factor of the size of the carriers as the firepower of the carrier's airwing:
I have talked with the CNO (Chief of Naval Operations) in America. He is very keen for us to get these because he sees us slotting in with his carrier groups. He really wants us to have these, but he wants us to have the same sort of clout as one of their carriers.[21]
Future plans for supercarriers in the United States involve the construction of the US Navy's next generation of carriers, the Gerald R. Ford class, which will have a 100,000 ton displacement.
Alternatives
The United States maintains eleven of these ships. Given their vulnerability to conventional and asymmetrical threats, more and smaller carriers have been suggested over the years, such as Zumwalt's Sea Control Ship.[22][23]
However, supercarriers are considered to be more cost effective than smaller carriers.[24]
The mobile offshore base (MOB) is a concept for a modular floating military base as large as 10 aircraft carriers. If realized, it could be moved anywhere throughout the world's oceans, obviating the need to seek permission from allied nations for use of land bases. The concept was studied in the 1990s by the U.S. government, but was abandoned in 2001 as cost prohibitive.
Classes
- United States class (USA, 1950s): Single-unit laid down, cancelled along with four others
- Forrestal class (USA, 1955): Four-unit class, all decommissioned
- Kitty Hawk class (USA, 1961): Four-unit class, all decommissioned
- Enterprise class (USA, 1961): Six-unit class, five cancelled, one still active
- Project 1153 Orel (USSR, 1970s): Cancelled
- Nimitz class (USA, 1975): 10 unit class, all active.
- Ulyanovsk class (USSR, 1990s): Two units cancelled after partial completion
- Gerald R. Ford class (USA, 2015): One unit in construction, one ordered, one pending order, further seven planned
- Queen Elizabeth class (UK, 2014): One unit in construction, one ordered
- Future French aircraft carrier (France, projected 2017): One proposed aircraft carrier in the range of 70,000–75,000 tons
See also
References
- ^ David Miller and Lindsay Peacock, Carriers: The Men and the Machines (London and New York: Salamander, 1991), p. 7: "There are four main types of carrier in service today. Largest of these are the super-carriers displacing over 70,000 tons; the U.S. Navy currently has fourteen, the Soviet Navy one."
- ^ Putting the Pentagon on a Recessionary Diet
- ^ 'Reich's Cruise Ships Held Potential Plane Carriers', New York Times (May 1, 1938), p. 32. [1]
- ^ "The Ark Royal Launched. Most Up-To-Date Carrier. Aircraft In The Fleet.", The Times (14 April 1937), p. 11.
- ^ Rossiter, Mike (2007) [2006]. Ark Royal: the life, death and rediscovery of the legendary Second World War aircraft carrier (2nd ed. ed.). London: Corgi Books. ISBN 9780552153690. OCLC 81453068.
{{cite book}}:|edition=has extra text (help) pp. 48–51. - ^ John G. Norris, "World's Largest Warships: Three 45,000-Ton Carriers For Bombers Ordered by Navy", The Washington Post (23 October 1943), pg. 1
- ^ "Va. Firm Gets Giant Carrier Building Job. 65,000-Ton Warship Will Be Largest in Postwar Program", The Washington Post (8 August 1948), p. 3.
- ^ Donald, David (2001). Carrier Aviation Air Power Directory. Norwalk, CT: AIRtime Publishing. p. 77. ISBN 1-880588-43-9.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|coauthors=ignored (|author=suggested) (help) - ^ MacDonald, Scot (1964-02-01). "14". Evolution of Aircraft Carriers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 69.
The versatility of the current U.S. carrier fleet is largely due to the operation of what the press has labeled 'super-carriers,' heavy duty aircraft carriers of the size, power, and potency of the Forrestals and the nuclear-powered Enterprise.
{{cite book}}: External link in|chapterurl=|chapterurl=ignored (|chapter-url=suggested) (help) - ^ House of Commons Written Questions for Answer, 8 September 2003
- ^ House of Lords, 15 March 2007.
- ^ House of Commons Written Answers for 17 June 2008
- ^ Select Committee on Scottish Affairs Minutes of Evidence, Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1–19), 17 July 2007
- ^ "Hoon to confirm 'supercarrier'". BBC News. 2001-06-22. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- ^ "Go-ahead given for work to start on supercarriers". Portsmouth News. 2008-05-20. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- ^ "VT at forefront of £3.9bn supercarrier project". Portsmouth News. 2008-05-20. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- ^ "Navy (France), Navy Assessment". Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment—Western Europe . 2008-12-03. Retrieved 2008-12-28.
{{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=(help) - ^ "Navy aircraft carriers delayed". The Northern Echo. 2008-12-11. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- ^ "Job concerns as MoD proposes carrier delay". The Courier. 2008-12-12. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- ^ Syson, Damon (2008-05-28). "The £4billion Airfix Kit: Behind-the-scenes at Britain's biggest warships". Daily Mail. London. Retrieved 2008-12-28.
- ^ House of Commons Minutes of Evidence
- ^ Fortress at Sea? The Carrier Invulnerability Myth
- ^ Lawmaker Calls for Study on Small Carriers
- ^ Warbirds of the sea: a history of aircraft carriers & carrier-based aircraft, By Walter A. Musciano, Page 553
External links
- Haze Gray & Underway, World Aircraft Carrier Lists—comprehensive and detailed listings of all the world's aircraft carriers and seaplane tenders from 1913–2001, with photo gallery.
- Aircraft carriers of the USN