User talk:DragonTiger23: Difference between revisions
←Created page with '{{subst:welcomeg}}' |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg--> |
||
==Your reverts in [[Stari Most]] and [[Latin Bridge]]== |
|||
I see you reverted me in those two articles. I can't understand what really "Ottoman Bridge" possibly means, especially in the last article since its official local name is "Latin bridge". Either is Latin or is Ottoman. Since the city's people calling it "Latin" how we can say "the Latin bridge is Ottoman bridge" starting that way the article? It is illogical, and it will seem strange to every reader. Seeing your initial edit, I preferred as a compromise to change it into "an Ottoman era bridge", but you immediately reverted it. Even more aggressively you decided to characterize my edit as "vandalism" in the edit log. I had never vandalised WP, nor I think my edit was a vandalism (see what really [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] is). So please avoid easy and offending characterizations in the future and stop looking for opponents in non existent battles. I don't want to open a quarrel over it, and accordingly I will not revert you, but please explain in the talk page of the article (as more editors to have the opportunity to comment), why you insist to call the Latin bridge Ottoman. Thanks, and again calm down.--[[Special:Contributions/79.166.157.163|79.166.157.163]] ([[User talk:79.166.157.163|talk]]) 10:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:39, 28 October 2010
|
Your reverts in Stari Most and Latin Bridge
I see you reverted me in those two articles. I can't understand what really "Ottoman Bridge" possibly means, especially in the last article since its official local name is "Latin bridge". Either is Latin or is Ottoman. Since the city's people calling it "Latin" how we can say "the Latin bridge is Ottoman bridge" starting that way the article? It is illogical, and it will seem strange to every reader. Seeing your initial edit, I preferred as a compromise to change it into "an Ottoman era bridge", but you immediately reverted it. Even more aggressively you decided to characterize my edit as "vandalism" in the edit log. I had never vandalised WP, nor I think my edit was a vandalism (see what really vandalism is). So please avoid easy and offending characterizations in the future and stop looking for opponents in non existent battles. I don't want to open a quarrel over it, and accordingly I will not revert you, but please explain in the talk page of the article (as more editors to have the opportunity to comment), why you insist to call the Latin bridge Ottoman. Thanks, and again calm down.--79.166.157.163 (talk) 10:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)