Jump to content

User talk:Monarchians: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 78: Line 78:


Thanks for uploading all those pictures! There is quite a lot of them I don't think I can do them all at once maybe about one-by-one?. Or maybe just the important ones, for example: the Crown Prince, Princess Sirindhorn, Princess Chulabhorn, the late Princess Galyani and Somdet Ya? But which ever way I will do them eventually- just very very slowly! if you don't mind that. [[User:Sodacan|Sodacan]] ([[User talk:Sodacan|talk]]) 04:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading all those pictures! There is quite a lot of them I don't think I can do them all at once maybe about one-by-one?. Or maybe just the important ones, for example: the Crown Prince, Princess Sirindhorn, Princess Chulabhorn, the late Princess Galyani and Somdet Ya? But which ever way I will do them eventually- just very very slowly! if you don't mind that. [[User:Sodacan|Sodacan]] ([[User talk:Sodacan|talk]]) 04:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

== Categorization for [[:Category:Chakri Dynasty|Chakri Dynasty]] ==

Re: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pin_Malakul&diff=311609305&oldid=311504216 this edit], I tend to disagree. You might like to take a look at [[Wikipedia:Categorization#Subcategorization]]. I think that since the [[:Category:Chakri Dynasty|Chakri Dynasty]] category is already broken into subcategories concerning the various houses, each member need only be included in the house category and not duplicated in the main category. --[[User:Paul_012|Paul_012]] <sup>([[User talk:Paul_012|talk]])</sup> 11:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

:I understand, but the point I'm trying to make is that in Wikipedia, when articles can be systematically categorized into subcategories, we don't usually repeat them in the mother category itself. That is, a user browsing the [[:Category:Chakri Dynasty]] page will be able to click through each of the family subcategories to reach the individual articles, but, in order to reduce clutter, those articles shouldn't be directly present on the main category page. --[[User:Paul_012|Paul_012]] <sup>([[User talk:Paul_012|talk]])</sup> 08:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

==Prince Bira==
Hi, I see you moved the Prince Bira article. It's not terribly helpful, since nearly all the articles in which he is mentioned refer to him as "Prince Bira", as his full name was never used. Please consider moving it back as per [[WP:Common name]] or at least fix the many redirects you have now made. See [[Help:Moving a page]]. [[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] ([[User talk:Bretonbanquet|talk]]) 08:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion|Templates for deletion]] nomination of [[:Template:Royal Thai images]] ==
[[File:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|30px]][[Template:{{ucfirst:Royal Thai images}}]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:{{ucfirst:Royal Thai images}}|the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])<sup>([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])</sup> 18:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


== Wan Waithayakon ==
== Wan Waithayakon ==
Line 103: Line 91:
==Your recent edits==
==Your recent edits==
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion{{#if:|, such as on [[{{{1}}}]]}}, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 10:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion{{#if:|, such as on [[{{{1}}}]]}}, you should [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your posts]] by typing four [[tilde]]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --[[User:SineBot|SineBot]] ([[User talk:SineBot|talk]]) 10:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

== Images from Bureau of the Royal Household, Kingdom of Thailand ==

I see that you have uploaded several images whose source and author you list as the Bureau of the Royal Household, Kingdom of Thailand, and you claim that they are all now free under the GNU license. What authority do you have to release them under this license? Are you the director of the Bureau or something? Or did the bureau decide to release all of its photos to the public, renouncing its copyrights? If not, please explain why these images should not all be deleted. -- [[User:Zsero|Zsero]] ([[User talk:Zsero|talk]]) 14:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
:Repeating the above Monarchians. You just removed a "permission required" tag from an image for which you, seemingly, do not have permission. Is there any reason that these images should not be deleted ? - [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 20:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

== File:King Bhumibol Adulyadej.jpg listed for deletion ==
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:King Bhumibol Adulyadej.jpg]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 12#File:King Bhumibol Adulyadej.jpg|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Idw --> [[User:HaeB|HaeB]] ([[User talk:HaeB|talk]]) 01:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:King_Bhumibol_Adulyadej.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:King_Bhumibol_Adulyadej.jpg]]'''{{#if:|, which you've sourced to {{{source}}}.|.}} I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
* make a note permitting reuse under the [[WP:CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-SA]] or another acceptable free license (see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses|this list]]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter [[WP:CONSENT|here]].

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]], and add a [[WP:NFURG|rationale]] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> [[User:Rockfang|Rockfang]] ([[User talk:Rockfang|talk]]) 10:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


==Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai==
==Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai==
Sorry to have changed the name of the article from ''Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai'' to just ''[[Intavaroros Suriyavongse]]'' but there is no need for the subject after the name in this case. This is because all Thai names are unique even for royalty and cannot be easily confused unlike George I of: [[George I of Great Britain|Great Britain]], [[George I of Greece|Greece]], [[George I of Georgia|Georgia]], [[George I of Russia|Russia]], [[George I of Bulgaria|Bulgaria]], and so on and on. In fact it is more of an honour to be known just by the name alone without the full dignities and titles (in English that is, unlike in Thai (where the longer the name the better)). For example [[Alexander the Great]] is known world wide, as oppose to '''"Alexander III of Macedon, Hegemon of the Hellenic League, Shahanshah of Persia, Pharaoh of Egypt and King of Asia"'''. [[User:Sodacan|Sodacan]] ([[User talk:Sodacan|talk]]) 12:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to have changed the name of the article from ''Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai'' to just ''[[Intavaroros Suriyavongse]]'' but there is no need for the subject after the name in this case. This is because all Thai names are unique even for royalty and cannot be easily confused unlike George I of: [[George I of Great Britain|Great Britain]], [[George I of Greece|Greece]], [[George I of Georgia|Georgia]], [[George I of Russia|Russia]], [[George I of Bulgaria|Bulgaria]], and so on and on. In fact it is more of an honour to be known just by the name alone without the full dignities and titles (in English that is, unlike in Thai (where the longer the name the better)). For example [[Alexander the Great]] is known world wide, as oppose to '''"Alexander III of Macedon, Hegemon of the Hellenic League, Shahanshah of Persia, Pharaoh of Egypt and King of Asia"'''. [[User:Sodacan|Sodacan]] ([[User talk:Sodacan|talk]]) 12:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:Queen Sirikit in 2009.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Queen Sirikit in 2009.jpg]]'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
* make a note permitting reuse under the [[WP:CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-SA]] or another acceptable free license (see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses|this list]]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter [[WP:CONSENT|here]].

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]], and add a [[WP:NFURG|rationale]] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 05:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:Princess Ubolratana Rajakanya.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Princess Ubolratana Rajakanya.jpg]]'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
* make a note permitting reuse under the [[WP:CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-SA]] or another acceptable free license (see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses|this list]]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter [[WP:CONSENT|here]].

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]], and add a [[WP:NFURG|rationale]] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 20:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:House of Chakrabongse.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:House of Chakrabongse.jpg]]'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
* make a note permitting reuse under the [[WP:CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-SA]] or another acceptable free license (see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses|this list]]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter [[WP:CONSENT|here]].

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]], and add a [[WP:NFURG|rationale]] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 20:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


==File permission problem with File:House of Kitiyakara.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:House of Kitiyakara.jpg]]'''. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
* make a note permitting reuse under the [[WP:CC-BY-SA|CC-BY-SA]] or another acceptable free license (see [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Free licenses|this list]]) '''at the site of the original publication'''; or
* Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}''', stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter [[WP:CONSENT|here]].

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to '''{{NoSpamEmail|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}'''.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at [[Wikipedia:Non-free content]], use a tag such as {{tlp|non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use]], and add a [[WP:NFURG|rationale]] justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no permission-notice --> [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 20:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


==File source problem with File:The Prince Narisara Nuvadtivongs.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:The Prince Narisara Nuvadtivongs.jpg]]'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the [[copyright]] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Monarchians this link]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''', as described on [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Images.2FMedia|criteria for speedy deletion]]. If the image is copyrighted under a [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Fair use|non-free license]] (per [[Wikipedia:Fair use]]) then '''the image will be deleted [[WP:CSD#I7|48 hours]] after 08:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)'''. If you have any questions please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> [[User:Salavat|Salavat]] ([[User talk:Salavat|talk]]) 08:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


== HH Prince Sukhumabhinanda ==
== HH Prince Sukhumabhinanda ==

Revision as of 10:04, 21 November 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Monarchians! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Category:Thai royalty has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ChrischTalk 16:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thai Royal Family's Standards

Hello,

Thanks for uploading all those pictures! There is quite a lot of them I don't think I can do them all at once maybe about one-by-one?. Or maybe just the important ones, for example: the Crown Prince, Princess Sirindhorn, Princess Chulabhorn, the late Princess Galyani and Somdet Ya? But which ever way I will do them eventually- just very very slowly! if you don't mind that. Sodacan (talk) 04:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wan Waithayakon

Hi,

I saw that you remained the article Wan Waithayakon. I am actually trying to sort out this person's actual given name/title(s). According to you, Vanna Vaidhayakara was his given name ? What were Naradhip Bhongseprabhan, Waiwaidhayakara and Wan Waithayakon. My knowledge of thai noble titles is next to nil, and I'm trying to improve that a little. (my actual goal being to improve the French article on this person). About the name change : the United Nations' website lists his name as Wan Waithayakon, so what is the deal with Vanna Vaidhayakara ? This name gives almost no results on google, while Wan Waithayakon seems pretty established. Are you sure this change of name isn't being confusing ? Thanks Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. Regardless of the article's title, I think it should specify that he was known in the west as Wan Waithayakon (that name is pretty official, as it is used in a professional capacity, i.e. at the United Nations), and specify the exact origin of this name + why and how it was used. Also, what is exactly Waiwaidhayakara ? A nickname ? Thanks for informing ignorant westerners like me. ;) (no irony, I'm just trying to understand) Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for all your info. I'll correct the French article and will just add that he was known in the West as Wan Waithayakon, in order to avoid any confusion (while letting you correct and add all the specifications as how this name was coined and when it was used.) Also, I wonder if the article shouldn't keep being titled Wan Waithayakon, since this is the name he used internationally and was known under ? The Plaek Pibulsonggram article is not titled Pibun Songkhram or Plaek Khittasangkha. Best, Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just wondering about the title, however. If Wan Waithayakon is the name by which he was known (and indeed a google search shows many results, while another with "Vanna Vaidhayakara"... shows only this article !), the current title is going to be confusing to readers. IMHO, if he was known by that name (it even appears on his autographed photo in the article, so he used it himself), the intro should say something like Wan Waithayakon [explain origin of the name here], born Vanna Vaidhayakara.... and "Wan Waithayakon" would be less misleading as a title. best regards, Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai

Sorry to have changed the name of the article from Intavaroros Suriyavongse of Chiang Mai to just Intavaroros Suriyavongse but there is no need for the subject after the name in this case. This is because all Thai names are unique even for royalty and cannot be easily confused unlike George I of: Great Britain, Greece, Georgia, Russia, Bulgaria, and so on and on. In fact it is more of an honour to be known just by the name alone without the full dignities and titles (in English that is, unlike in Thai (where the longer the name the better)). For example Alexander the Great is known world wide, as oppose to "Alexander III of Macedon, Hegemon of the Hellenic League, Shahanshah of Persia, Pharaoh of Egypt and King of Asia". Sodacan (talk) 12:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HH Prince Sukhumabhinanda

You listed HH Prince Sukhumabhinanda as Knight Cross of the Most Illustrious Order of Chula Chom Klao and the ribbon image is that of a Knight Grand Cordon of the Most Illustrious Order of Chula Chom Klao. I am not sure whether you meant for him to be listed as a Knight Grand Cordon or a Knight Grand Cross of the Most Illustrious Order of Chula Chom Klao. If he was a Knight Grand Cordon, then only the title needs to be adjusted. If a Knight Grand Cross, then both the title and ribbon image need to be adjusted. Can you advise on his correct grade? Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 16:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]