Jump to content

Talk:.476 Enfield: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m assess
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
{{reqphoto|in=Canada}}
{{reqphoto|in=Canada}}
{{dyktalk|3 December|2008|entry=... that despite their names, the [[revolver]] [[Cartridge (firearms)|cartridge]] '''[[.476 Enfield]]''', [[.455 Webley]], [[.476 Enfield|.476 Eley]], and [[.455 Webley|.455 Colt]] all interchange?|views=2276}}
{{dyktalk|3 December|2008|entry=... that despite their names, the [[revolver]] [[Cartridge (firearms)|cartridge]] '''[[.476 Enfield]]''', [[.455 Webley]], [[.476 Enfield|.476 Eley]], and [[.455 Webley|.455 Colt]] all interchange?|views=2276}}

==Mass and Muzzle Velocity==
What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455?


==Oh, Canada==
==Oh, Canada==

Revision as of 11:40, 26 November 2010

Mass and Muzzle Velocity

What was the muzzle-energy of the .476 compared to the .455?

Oh, Canada

I tagged WP Canada & WP LEO, since the .476 Enfield Mk 1 revolver was a NWMP weapon. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 05:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the WP Canada tag, as the connection is very minor. PKT(alk) 16:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not if somebody can get a pic here... TREKphiler hit me ♠ 01:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Re-removed the WP Canada tag, this article is not within the scope of the project. PKT(alk) 16:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.455 Webley

There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added some there; hope that addresses the issue. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romans

Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.4.142.104 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also changed them in the source titles, whichi is a wrong change. Also, you could (should) have simply said this in the edit summary. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]