|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .476 Enfield article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|A fact from .476 Enfield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 3 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,276 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: "Did you know
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- I removed the WP Canada tag, as the connection is very minor. PKT(alk) 16:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Re-removed the WP Canada tag, this article is not within the scope of the project. PKT(alk) 16:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
There appear to be some discrepancies between this article and that for the .455 Webley concerning loadings for the latter (I am not expert in such matters.) — Robert Greer (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Added some there; hope that addresses the issue. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Changed Arabic numerals for Mark variations to Roman numerals. British nomenclature did not use Arabic numerals for Marks until after WW II, well past the time when this cartridge was in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- You also changed them in the source titles, which is a wrong change. Also, you could (should) have simply said this in the edit summary. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 19:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Mass and Muzzle Velocity
Error about the .476 Enfield Cartridge
After trying and checking with my collection I found this round only can loaded when the Revolver is marked 455/476. This means the chamber is tapered in shape, not steped like the normal chamber in the normal .455 round. The book: Cartridges of the World is wrong so don't quote it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nambu44 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)