Revision as of 12:51, 29 December 2010

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

France Unassessed

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

NPOV

If this is the 1911 Britannica article, Britannica should hang its head in shame. For the many people who believe Napoleon was murdered, deMontholon is the favorite suspect, the only plausible one, at that. Furthermore, deMontholon's military exploits were all made up, and he was once convicted of stealing his soldiers' payroll. It is now generally recognized that whether he murdered Bonaparte or not, he was a first-class scoundrel.

See Schama's Napoleon Bonaparte (link to an Amazon "Search Inside" for Montholon) Dan Lovejoy 07:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In 1911 there were no reasons for believing Napoleon had been poisoned and so no need to look for an assassin. The assassination theory and its supporting evidence are the fruit of modern forensic investigation techniques. Further, while the evidence that Napoleon was poisoned is physical and very clear, the evidence identifying the culprit is circumstantial; Montholon is at most a likely suspect. Cheers, Vincent 02:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have written a summary of the present state of knowledge on the issue. It is found here.

2009-08-29 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

Birth year

Was he not really born in 1783? According to Sten Forshufvud Charles was a frequent liar. He may had lied about his age claiming to be one year older than he was. What is known from other sources than himself?

2009-03-02 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

Portrait

A better portrait of Charles can be found here. It has considerable beautification as well but it is at least less misleading. The picture has no copyright. If there originally was any it has expired by now.

2010-12-29 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 -03-02  Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.
+= Portrait =
+A better portrait of Charles can be found [http://ifraagasaetterskan.se/index.php?supermode=gallery_view&previewm=1&a=charles_tristan_de_montholon&image=101225081125_charles_tristan_de_montholon.jpg&screenres=1280-768 here].  It has considerable beautification as well but it is at least less misleading.  The picture has no copyright.  If there originally was any it has expired by now.
+-12-29  Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.