Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom: Difference between revisions
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) →Article status: end this hypocrisy now |
Ohconfucius (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*He's done it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-01-10/Arbitration_report&diff=406828475&oldid=406827811 again]. <Yawn> --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
*He's done it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-01-10/Arbitration_report&diff=406828475&oldid=406827811 again]. <Yawn> --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 09:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Unless you're looking to be blocked, stop it. It's not a matter of who created or started writing a report first, and this is not the first time you've been edit-warring on this (and other) Signpost articles. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2F2011-01-10%2FArbitration_report&action=historysubmit&diff=406848591&oldid=406828475 Wholesale reversion of content] is further problematic when it is not just a matter of what name appears first as author. What we need is quality content that is actually useful to our readers. Be it your editing of this page, or your editing of that report in particular, this is really becoming a tedious exercise where you keep using Signpost to produce substandard reports (but more troubling than that is when you use ''Signpost'' as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] at the same time). I had to clean up your mess for the 20 Dec edition, and I'm having to do it again. Given the lack of improvement, I'm really not sure if you've paid attention to the notes I wrote at the time (yet again, I've found inaccuracies in this report meaning I've had to revamp (and still am rewriting) much of it from scratch). [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 10:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
::Unless you're looking to be blocked, stop it. It's not a matter of who created or started writing a report first, and this is not the first time you've been edit-warring on this (and other) Signpost articles. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2F2011-01-10%2FArbitration_report&action=historysubmit&diff=406848591&oldid=406828475 Wholesale reversion of content] is further problematic when it is not just a matter of what name appears first as author. What we need is quality content that is actually useful to our readers. Be it your editing of this page, or your editing of that report in particular, this is really becoming a tedious exercise where you keep using Signpost to produce substandard reports (but more troubling than that is when you use ''Signpost'' as a [[WP:BATTLE|battleground]] at the same time). I had to clean up your mess for the 20 Dec edition, and I'm having to do it again. Given the lack of improvement, I'm really not sure if you've paid attention to the notes I wrote at the time (yet again, I've found inaccuracies in this report meaning I've had to revamp (and still am rewriting) much of it from scratch). [[User:Ncmvocalist|Ncmvocalist]] ([[User talk:Ncmvocalist|talk]]) 10:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
::*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-01-10/Arbitration_report&diff=prev&oldid=406852416 This] just wreaks of rank hypocrisy. --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 11:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
::*TL:DR the above. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-01-10/Arbitration_report&diff=prev&oldid=406852416 This] just wreaks of rank hypocrisy. Why don't you just fucking get to the beach earlier next time. --[[User:Ohconfucius|<span style="color:Black;font:bold 8pt kristen itc;text-shadow:cyan 0.3em 0.3em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Ohconfucius</span>]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|<sup>¡digame!</sup>]] 11:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
|Task7= Technology report |
|Task7= Technology report |
Revision as of 11:19, 9 January 2011
Next issue: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Issue/Next, 2011Due for publication: Error: first parameter cannot be parsed as a date or time.! Deadline this week is 3:00 UTC, Monday Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Issue/Next. Notices for contributors this week
Article status
Regular responsibilitiesSignpost journalists can claim responsibility for regular features, and continue writing their beat for as long as they wish. If you would like to be a regular writer for The Signpost, add your name to the appropriate task. If you'd be willing to cover a story that is usually covered by another editor, or are willing to cover it sporadically when the normal writer can't, add your name to the Backup list so you can be contacted when the need arises – the more the merrier. If a beat is not assigned to anyone and no draft for the next issue is listed above, anyone should feel free to write it that week. |