Jump to content

User talk:Kaverijha23: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Warning: Uh, no.
Line 81: Line 81:


It's not an IP range but a ''single'' IP address. Secondly, you are the only person who has been editing on this IP for quite a while. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 08:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
It's not an IP range but a ''single'' IP address. Secondly, you are the only person who has been editing on this IP for quite a while. –[[User talk:MuZemike|MuZemike]] 08:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

== Request continued ==

{{unblock|that is what I am saying my friend recently kaverijha23 that is me did most of the constructive editing on the IP, further this is an internet center,sometimes while editing it si quite natural to always login as kaverijha23 as other users will login with their own user name,I have lot of sourcd material with me to contribute to wikipedia articles,blocking informative editors like me will discourage them as they feel abused by this unreasonable blocking,just give me one more last chance, i will see my best i only use kaverijha23 always, after that ur wish}}

Revision as of 08:38, 28 January 2011

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Kaverijha23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Hyderabad, India. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! TheMike •Wassup doc? 13:49, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random edit summaries

Why do some of your edit summaries bear little relation to your edits? You removed line breaks in the article's main body and labeled the edit "infobox". You removed two paragraphs of info with the edit summary "NO SUCH TEMPLATE REQUIRED". Maybe you don't know what a template or an infobox is? Overall your edits to Rakta Charitra were not as destructive as I thought they were going to be. But I would offer this advice: DON'T SHOUT ALL THE TIME IN YOUR EDIT SUMMARIES (using all capital letters is interpreted as shouting) and make your edit summaries better reflect what you're doing in the edits! Thanks. AtticusX (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

You can request page protection here: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Persistant vandalism is generally required before protection is granted, I am not sure the threshold is met on this article. A request to semi protect articles for all telagu actors would not be granted. Active Banana (bananaphone 19:17, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, it is in part you that is making a bad edit too: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Filmography_tables clearly says not to use rowspan. Please fix your mistake. DMacks (talk) 16:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Kindly stop edit warring and use the talk page if you disagree on something. You have reverted everything, edited as you wish sourced information and added unsourced info. If you continue that way, I'll have to file a report against you. Shahid • Talk2me 20:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your edits because they are not correct and use the talk page. Your behaviour is most disruptive and will not be taken lightly. Shahid • Talk2me 20:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Filmfare Awards. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 20:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk page

Per your edit summary that you dont know how to use talk pages, click on the "discussion" tab at the top of the article page, it will take you here: Talk:Filmfare Awards where you can initiate or respond to the appropriate conversation. Active Banana (bananaphone 20:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, the conversation has begun at: Talk:Filmfare_Awards#Notice. Active Banana (bananaphone 20:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and name calling

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Filmfare Awards. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
  3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Active Banana (bananaphone 20:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In addtion, your comments such as [[1]] are not appropriate. Treat other editors civilly and do not make random accusations of "pupperty". Active Banana (bananaphone 20:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Nakon 20:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your clear block evasion via an IP address, I have reset your block and extended it to 3 days; your block now expires 3 days from now. You are advised that any further evasion of your block may lead to you being indefinitely blocked. Regards, –MuZemike 21:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Although you started messaging me while evading a block, I'll reply. First, I know who you are and we have already been in a disagreement once on the National Film Awards pages. In this case, if both Filmfare and Filmfare South are given by The Times Group, then it can be mentionedin an article about The Times Group. The article on Filmfare Awards should have info only about them, and not the South awards. A separate article about the Southern awards already exists, and that's where info about them actually belongs.

Also, no one says Filmfare is the equivalent of the Oscars. We say it is referred to as such, which is sourced to reliable sources. Shahid • Talk2me 21:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shshshsh is a vandal

{{unblock|IP address is part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing your site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects your site, it does affect a large number of innocent users. user shahid - Shshshsh is (dongamundakoduku) is abusing me constantly with personal opinions - rangeblocks like this are a last resort.}}

Halo

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kaverijha23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

for gods sake leave this user alone - this Shshshsh is a sockpuppet with user name active banana - i have explained all my edits in edit pages this user Shshshsh is clubbed with this scoundrel 3=MuZemike and abusing me for gods sake for gods sake before blocking em please send mesage to why ur blocking me - i am doing valuble contributions to wikipedis for gods sake scoundrels leave this user name alone which is becoming victim like abusing accounts like padmalakshmisx - Shshshs is sockpuppeting against me with username padmalakshmisx AND ACTIVE BANANA muslim dongmundakoduku shahid

Decline reason:

your unblock requests do not address your reason for blocking, it's them, not me is not a valid reason; you have been informed that you have been blocked for using multiple accounts in a manner against site policy. If you continue to make similar unblock requests, your talk page access will be removed.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

—SpacemanSpiff 07:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

leave me alone for gods sake

{{121.247.113.58|Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: [[User:Padmalakshmisx]]|MuZemike}}

Warning

Do not remove declined unblock requests from your talk page, if you continue to do so, your talk page rights will be removed. —SpacemanSpiff 08:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kaverijha23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all the edits with kaverijha23 are all creative, amzing and valuable contributions, i have no idea about padmalakshmi, ppwrong and other sock puppetry, this IP address is used by an internet center and is a dial up- IP address is part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing your site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects your site, it does affect a large number of innocent users especially me. user shahid - Shshshsh is abusing me constantly with personal opinions - rangeblocks like this are a last resort - please send me a reasonable message before blindly blocking me on what this vandal Shshshsh accuses me of

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=all the edits with kaverijha23 are all creative, amzing and valuable contributions, i have no idea about padmalakshmi, ppwrong and other sock puppetry, this IP address is used by an internet center and is a dial up- IP address is part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing your site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects your site, it does affect a large number of innocent users especially me. user shahid - Shshshsh is abusing me constantly with personal opinions - rangeblocks like this are a last resort - please send me a reasonable message before blindly blocking me on what this vandal Shshshsh accuses me of |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=all the edits with kaverijha23 are all creative, amzing and valuable contributions, i have no idea about padmalakshmi, ppwrong and other sock puppetry, this IP address is used by an internet center and is a dial up- IP address is part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing your site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects your site, it does affect a large number of innocent users especially me. user shahid - Shshshsh is abusing me constantly with personal opinions - rangeblocks like this are a last resort - please send me a reasonable message before blindly blocking me on what this vandal Shshshsh accuses me of |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=all the edits with kaverijha23 are all creative, amzing and valuable contributions, i have no idea about padmalakshmi, ppwrong and other sock puppetry, this IP address is used by an internet center and is a dial up- IP address is part of a large range that has been blocked to prevent an abusive user from vandalizing your site. Unfortunately, while this adequately protects your site, it does affect a large number of innocent users especially me. user shahid - Shshshsh is abusing me constantly with personal opinions - rangeblocks like this are a last resort - please send me a reasonable message before blindly blocking me on what this vandal Shshshsh accuses me of |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

It's not an IP range but a single IP address. Secondly, you are the only person who has been editing on this IP for quite a while. –MuZemike 08:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request continued

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kaverijha23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that is what I am saying my friend recently kaverijha23 that is me did most of the constructive editing on the IP, further this is an internet center,sometimes while editing it si quite natural to always login as kaverijha23 as other users will login with their own user name,I have lot of sourcd material with me to contribute to wikipedia articles,blocking informative editors like me will discourage them as they feel abused by this unreasonable blocking,just give me one more last chance, i will see my best i only use kaverijha23 always, after that ur wish

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=that is what I am saying my friend recently kaverijha23 that is me did most of the constructive editing on the IP, further this is an internet center,sometimes while editing it si quite natural to always login as kaverijha23 as other users will login with their own user name,I have lot of sourcd material with me to contribute to wikipedia articles,blocking informative editors like me will discourage them as they feel abused by this unreasonable blocking,just give me one more last chance, i will see my best i only use kaverijha23 always, after that ur wish |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=that is what I am saying my friend recently kaverijha23 that is me did most of the constructive editing on the IP, further this is an internet center,sometimes while editing it si quite natural to always login as kaverijha23 as other users will login with their own user name,I have lot of sourcd material with me to contribute to wikipedia articles,blocking informative editors like me will discourage them as they feel abused by this unreasonable blocking,just give me one more last chance, i will see my best i only use kaverijha23 always, after that ur wish |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=that is what I am saying my friend recently kaverijha23 that is me did most of the constructive editing on the IP, further this is an internet center,sometimes while editing it si quite natural to always login as kaverijha23 as other users will login with their own user name,I have lot of sourcd material with me to contribute to wikipedia articles,blocking informative editors like me will discourage them as they feel abused by this unreasonable blocking,just give me one more last chance, i will see my best i only use kaverijha23 always, after that ur wish |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kaverijha23&oldid=410528931"