Talk:Rachel Berry: Difference between revisions
HorrorFan121 (talk | contribs) +requested move |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=GA|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=GA|importance=low}} |
||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move 2010 == |
||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
On the "Rachel Berry (Glee)" page it says "[[Patti LuPone]] - in [[Dream On (Glee)|Dream On]], when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects [[List of Broadway musicals stars|Broadway star]] Patti LuPone is her mother." in the "Musical Influences" section. It should be noted that in Dream On, after explaining to [[Jesse St. James]] why LuPone is her mother Rachel comments, "Do you want to hear my investigation on why Bernadette Peters is my mother?" I beleive that [[Bernadette Peters]] should be added to Rachel's "Musical Influences" setion, as so: "[[Patti LuPone]] and [[Bernadette Peters]] - in [[Dream On (Glee)|Dream On]], when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects [[List of Broadway musicals stars|Broadway star]] Patti LuPone or Bernadette Peters is her mother" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.228.121.63|96.228.121.63]] ([[User talk:96.228.121.63|talk]]) 01:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
On the "Rachel Berry (Glee)" page it says "[[Patti LuPone]] - in [[Dream On (Glee)|Dream On]], when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects [[List of Broadway musicals stars|Broadway star]] Patti LuPone is her mother." in the "Musical Influences" section. It should be noted that in Dream On, after explaining to [[Jesse St. James]] why LuPone is her mother Rachel comments, "Do you want to hear my investigation on why Bernadette Peters is my mother?" I beleive that [[Bernadette Peters]] should be added to Rachel's "Musical Influences" setion, as so: "[[Patti LuPone]] and [[Bernadette Peters]] - in [[Dream On (Glee)|Dream On]], when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects [[List of Broadway musicals stars|Broadway star]] Patti LuPone or Bernadette Peters is her mother" <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.228.121.63|96.228.121.63]] ([[User talk:96.228.121.63|talk]]) 01:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move 2011 == |
||
{{Requested move/dated|Rachel Berry}} |
{{Requested move/dated|Rachel Berry}} |
||
[[Rachel Berry (Glee)]] → {{no redirect|1=Rachel Berry}} — Article is a primary topic. It has been viewed 76,489 times in the last 30 days [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Rachel_Berry_%28Glee%29] compared to the legislator's 482.[http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Rachel_Berry_%28legislator%29] I don't see the disambiguation page necessary. A hate note can cover it. --[[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
[[Rachel Berry (Glee)]] → {{no redirect|1=Rachel Berry}} — Article is a primary topic. It has been viewed 76,489 times in the last 30 days [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Rachel_Berry_%28Glee%29] compared to the legislator's 482.[http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Rachel_Berry_%28legislator%29] I don't see the disambiguation page necessary. A hate note can cover it. --[[User:HorrorFan121|HorrorFan121]] ([[User talk:HorrorFan121|talk]]) 03:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' the disambiguation page is fine where it is. [[Special:Contributions/65.93.15.125|65.93.15.125]] ([[User talk:65.93.15.125|talk]]) 04:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Comment''' there should be a move notice placed on the talk page for the disambiguation page and the politician's talk page. [[Special:Contributions/65.93.15.125|65.93.15.125]] ([[User talk:65.93.15.125|talk]]) 04:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:40, 1 March 2011
![]() | Rachel Berry has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Television: Glee GA‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Fictional characters GA‑class | ||||||
|
Requested move 2010
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 08:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Rachel Berry (Glee) → Rachel Berry — Relist Vegaswikian (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Primary topic. I don't think the disambig page is necessary - a hat-note will suffice. This article has averaged 939 views per day this month, compared to Rachel Berry (legislator)'s 12. Frickative 01:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Relisting Ronhjones (Talk) 00:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:RECENTISM, leave the dab in place. 65.94.253.16 (talk) 05:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'd suggest that WP:PT overrules an essay in this instance. It seems clear when this article is receiving upwards of a thousand visits daily, while the other article barely manages a dozen, this is the intended target for the majority of users typing 'Rachel Berry' into the search box. Frickative 05:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support per Frickative. If nearly 100x times as many people are looking at one article rather than the other, it doesn't make sense to inconvenience them by sending them through the dab page. Propaniac (talk) 15:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- That's this month. Notability can be measured on much longer timescales than this year's page hits. Searching on Google Books gives significantly more results for the suffragist, unsurprisingly. Knepflerle (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, of course; one reason would be that people have had about 150 more years to write books giving a passing mention to the legislator compared to the TV character. (And the vast majority of the Google Book hits for the name seem to be genealogical studies not apparently discussing the legislator, either.) I can think of no reason why that should be a factor in this discussion, much less a deciding factor. Per the guideline WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, our guiding criteria should be which article users are likely to be seeking when they search for "Rachel Berry." Propaniac (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose; no indication this is the primary topic in anything other than the very near future. Knepflerle (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- You do know that if, next month, everyone suddenly forgets about one of the top-rated, most influential, and most ardently-adored shows on television, and/or there is a humongous (10,000+%) uptick in interest in this minor politician, pages can be moved again, right? Even taking into account that yes, the show will eventually go off the air and fewer people will be interested in its characters, it seems quite unreasonable to me to suppose that the level of interest in these two articles will be significantly more equal anytime in the next several years. Propaniac (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Somehow I can't bring myself to support a proposal that a fictional character in a television series is the primary topic over a real person. If Glee was set in the fictional town of Leeds, would we also be getting a claim that it was the primary topic over the real city? Skinsmoke (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- 56,000 people viewed the Leeds article last month; 56 people viewed Rachel Berry (legislator). A better comparison would be a very well-known fictional town with the same name as a very small community, in which case the fictional town could very well be the primary topic, and in fact this is already the case for some Wikipedia articles, e.g. Dogpatch, Kings Oak, Walford, Fiddler's Green and Twin Peaks (latter two are slightly different, but they're fictional uses superseding real places as primary topics). Propaniac (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. I note that WP:PT says "If there is extended discussion about which article truly is the primary topic, that may be a sign that there is in fact no primary topic." A disambiguation page is appropriate. StAnselm (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Do note, however, that Knepflerle's opposition concedes that this subject is the primary topic at present, even if it may not be in the future, while Skinsmoke's opposition is based on the invalid assumption that being fictional and being a primary topic are mutually exclusive states. Frickative 21:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- I made no such assumption. I said I couldn't bring myself to support it. Skinsmoke (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, on the basis that the subject is fictional. Apologies if I have misconstrued your opposition, but if there's more to it than that then you might wish to clarify? Frickative 15:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- I made no such assumption. I said I couldn't bring myself to support it. Skinsmoke (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sigh. I'm getting kind of tired of seeing the claim, in move discussions, that disagreement between people heeding the guideline and people ignoring it is the same thing as people disagreeing on how to best meet the guideline, which is what the "extended discussion" is referring to. The beginning of the guideline is clear that the relevant criteria is which topic is most likely to be sought by readers, and it does not distinguish on the basis of topics being fictional or frivolous. Propaniac (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Do note, however, that Knepflerle's opposition concedes that this subject is the primary topic at present, even if it may not be in the future, while Skinsmoke's opposition is based on the invalid assumption that being fictional and being a primary topic are mutually exclusive states. Frickative 21:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support per Frickative and 100 times greater or more the Glee character is viewed per day, or at least redirect Rachel Berry to the Glee character with a diambig note at the top linking to the legislature. CTJF83 chat 18:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Musical Influences: Bernadette Peters
On the "Rachel Berry (Glee)" page it says "Patti LuPone - in Dream On, when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects Broadway star Patti LuPone is her mother." in the "Musical Influences" section. It should be noted that in Dream On, after explaining to Jesse St. James why LuPone is her mother Rachel comments, "Do you want to hear my investigation on why Bernadette Peters is my mother?" I beleive that Bernadette Peters should be added to Rachel's "Musical Influences" setion, as so: "Patti LuPone and Bernadette Peters - in Dream On, when Rachel is investigating her past, she suspects Broadway star Patti LuPone or Bernadette Peters is her mother" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.121.63 (talk) 01:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 2011
![]() | The request to rename this article to Rachel Berry has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Rachel Berry (Glee) → Rachel Berry — Article is a primary topic. It has been viewed 76,489 times in the last 30 days [1] compared to the legislator's 482.[2] I don't see the disambiguation page necessary. A hate note can cover it. --HorrorFan121 (talk) 03:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose the disambiguation page is fine where it is. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment there should be a move notice placed on the talk page for the disambiguation page and the politician's talk page. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- GA-Class Glee articles
- High-importance Glee articles
- Glee task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- GA-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Requested moves