:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Katiegodess60&diff=422786486&oldid=422785597 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 01:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Katiegodess60&diff=422786486&oldid=422785597 Replied] on your talk page. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 01:14, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
== tell me mate y did u delete it ==
i worked so hard on it...just coz u got power u cannot delete pages....what if u wer in my shoes...would u like if someone deleted all ur handword no right?
so i want my page back
Revision as of 05:44, 7 April 2011
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
Use a descriptive subject/headline.
If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.
A bitter content dispute which I'm involved in has escalated, and personal attacks have continued by RogerO SD despite a final warning. I contend the info he's trying to add is in violation of WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. Please intervene.Jasper Deng(talk)00:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since the discussion has been closed and no further edits have recently occurred, there really is not any need for me to intervene at this time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm having problems with User talk:Swimsuitfan who is continully using a voyeur site on the article One-piece swimsuit where people PAY to watch perverted photos of women in swimsuits. I feel this violation of two terms. 1; As it's members have to pay for it, I feel it is the equation of advertising/spam. 2: It is a voyeur website and unsuitable for wikipedia's links. I removed it, but he (only a man would put this site here) returned it and claimed I was removing it because I am "narrowminded" and I should keep my views in "church". I see you have warned him before. Even after, he just returned it and hoped you wouldn't notice. I feel new action is needed against him. He claims it's not his site, but is fan fan. That surely is not an excuse to put in such a site. 60.224.3.242 (talk) 19:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct in removing it. I see that Kuru has left the user a warning about it. If the editor continues to add the links, I recommend that you give him a final warning for spamming and then if he continues after that, report him to WP:AIV. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I appear to have blocked this editor at the same time you gave him a final waring. After reviewing his edits and the ones caught by the edit filter, this simply appeared to be a garden-variety troll. If you feel this should go through more extensive warnings to see if he will come around, I would not object. Kuru(talk)15:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously! I worked hard trying to make a story for my sisters! This was for my sisters to read not for people to delete it!!! so I want my page back so I could impress my sisters and my family!!! so please give me my page back or I'll get them!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katiegodess60 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i worked so hard on it...just coz u got power u cannot delete pages....what if u wer in my shoes...would u like if someone deleted all ur handword no right?
so i want my page back