User talk:Peridon

Just in case anyone wants to talk to me.... Peridon (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Back numbers of this magazine can be found at: User talk:Peridon/Archives/2008/November User talk:Peridon/Archives/2009/May User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/February User talk:Peridon/Archives/2010/January

The rest of this is archived somewhere. There's a nice little bot comes in and tidies up. (Could do with one at home...) Not quite sure where it puts the stuff, but I'm working on it... Meantime, copy one of the above and change the date to suit.

Please add messages at the bottom of the page so I can find them. Thanks. Do put a heading inside == == and sign with ~~~~.

Pac is Back

I don't know if you knew but actully Pac is Back is a CGI TV series coming in 2012 about Pac-Man. Yes I know Pac-Man allready had a TV show by Hanna Barbera but Pac is Back is by Namco & is about Pac-Man as a teenager. You can read about it on the Pac-Man wiki. Let me know if you found it. User:MrJoshbumstead.

Nik_Kolidas Deleted

I'm not sure why the Nik Kolidas page I set up was deleted. This is an act with a current music video featuring a movie star, a studio album with other wiki artists on it and popularity in a major metropolitan city. There were also independent references listed. Kindly please reconsider or let me know how I need to word it differently. User:SambaGaz.

Talkback

Hello, Peridon. You have new messages at Pelmeen10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JohnMicheals

I dont appreciate that you deleted the page The Dave Rule. It has important information within, and just because you may be unfamiliar with it at the present moment, but in time you may come to hear of its existence.

Article "Kristin Reilly' Deletion

Hello there,

Firstly, it's great to se such speedy and active admins working at keeping wikipedia articles up the the standard set for wiki pages. I'm new, and am still learning so my page was just deleted after a Speedy Deletion mark was placed on it.

This is the log message: 19:53, 25 April 2011 Peridon (talk | contribs) deleted "Kristin Reilly" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content))

I contested the deletion, and clearly stated that the article wasn't done yet. It was still being made, and would be completed over several edits. This has happened many times already, I can't get the page up for half an hour, and while searching for more to add/etc... I come back to find it deleted already. It wasn't done yet. I would be grateful if it could be undeleted, and now that I know what the problem is, I can fix it. I'm new to this, and am still learning, so I've learned from my mistakes and am ready to fix it and continue. Thanks very much for your time, and I hope to see this article back soon. :)

BF Joshua

Why article MMM-2011 is deleted?

What was the reason for deletion of |this article? What was wrong with it, how I can fix it? Konard (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I've added some citations, to the MMM article. But I think your reaction was too aggressive, you even didn`t explain what is wrong before deletion. So I've been forced to wait your answer and do nothing. And you just deleted it. Google have enough information about this person, his organization (МММ) and the last project MMM-2011. Konard (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I've fixed link to time.com. Check it out. Konard (talk) 03:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Peridon. You have new messages at This lousy T-shirt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—This lousy T-shirt (talk) 01:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Användare:Puggan

I guess Användare is Swedish for "User" then? You learn something every day... Catfish Jim & the soapdish 11:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

[truthalwaystriumphs]

Pls have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kushwaha, this is being redirecetd to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kachwaha and I restored the original content with great difficulty. Pls understand that Kushwaha and Kachwaha are two different groups. It is also noted that this is being vandalised at times. Pls dont merge the two as they peratin to two very different groups in India. Thanx.

Truthalwaystriumphs 18:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Salamiyyah

I guess they were buried in the Google search, since most of the results were talking about a city. Guess I was mistaken - sorry about the inconvenience. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

G2 deletion of Strongest country

Hi, I was just wondering about your G2 CSD of Strongest country. While I agree the page needs to be deleted, are you sure that it really qualifies as a test page? I was trying to figure out a CSD criteria to apply, but none really seemed appropriate except maybe A10, but that would be a stretch. Not a loss, and certainly not asking for an undo, just wondering. Thanks, Monty₈₄₅ 18:49, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Springs Window Fashions (Bali and Graber Blinds)

I'm new to adding articles to Wikipedia and I am doing this simply as a request by my employer to provide more information on what our company has to offer. Springs Window Fashions is currently the second largest blinds and shades seller in the world, Hunter Douglas being the first. I did not feel as though my articles were advertisements in any way since they provided a pretty detailed history, as well as a list of our location and product information. There was no promotional information anywhere in the articles. Could you please explain to me why you deleted these articles and what I can do to improve them for posting to Wikipedia? </nowiki> Springs Window Fashions.

"I'm new to adding articles to Wikipedia and I am doing this simply as a request by my employer to provide more information on what our company has to offer." Have a look at WP:COI which is to do with conflict of interest - editing things you have a close connection with. Also look at WP:SPAM which is to do with promotion and advertising. Now, the articles. First, if you say 'we' that SHOUTS spam (so does using ® and ™ - it may be a registered trade mark, but Wikipedia doesn't use them). Second, you almost totally use company or linked sites as references. Not good. See WP:RS for what are and aren't 'reliable sources'. Own sites don't count as reliable. Nor do blogs, forums and Wikipedia for the reason that anyone can edit them. (In the case of Wikipedia, accuracy is maintained by other editors reverting or amending, but there's always that little gap...) You say you are the world's second largest - you have to prove that independently of the company's own site. "The Bali brand has long been providing beautiful, quality window treatments to customers around the world" - again, this shouts advert. Would you say that to someone? (OK, you might - I don't know you....) Would it be found in a brochure - yes. WP:PEACOCK. If you've got a copy of what you put up, have a look at it again in the hard light of this message. Pretend you're working for Hunter Douglas and looking for a way to get this article off Wikipedia. Have a look at their article Hunter Douglas (on which I've just stuck two tags complaining about the referencing...) and see if it fails any of the policies. (If you think it does, let me know. It was first created before some of the current tightening up came in.) When you've done all that, get back to me. (If you haven't got a copy, let me know. Peridon (talk) 16:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

BTW In my opinion, only one article would be needed for the company as a whole. You repeated a lot of stuff in the history. If a main article passes muster, a redirect can be put on for the main brands so people looking for them can be taken to the main article. Peridon (talk) 16:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I will take a look into this and see what can be done to accomodate your recommended changes. This article truely isn't meant to be promotional. The goal is to simply to provide information about the company. Of the suggestions you made, is the biggest problem the sources or is there a lot of other strikes against the article (other than comments you posted about trademarks and particular statements, which should be easy to take care of)? Legally I had thought I had to use trademarks - I take it this is irrelevant for Wikipedia? Levelor and Hunter Douglas were the pages used as "inspiration" so to speak as to how to format the articles - I will take a look at these again. Also, is there any way you could re-instate the draft stage of the Springs Window Fashions article? I won't be posting it until all issues are resolved but it would be a lot easier to re-work and have comments posted directly to the drafted article. I will look into combining the three into one, so the Bali and Graber articles are fine being deleted but life sure would be easier if I could get the Springs article back. Thanks again for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandter (talk • contribs) 17:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Little procedural note: when on talk pages, please sign with ~~~~, and indent posts in a thread with a : at the start to make it easy to see what's where. (Obviously, :: and ::: make it deeper.) Your draft is at User:Brandter/Springs Window Fashions. Peridon (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Gendai

Hi there. You deleted the page Gendai. I think the idea of whoever marked it for deletion was that Gendai (disambiguation) would be renamed to "Gendai". I'd do it but I don't know how. Tesspub (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Atego (disambiguation)

Atego (disambiguation) was (speedy) deleted. For a consistent approach the established page Aonix must be deleted also. I suggest to undelete Atego (disambiguation). It could be that the lorry Atego is primary topic, but a deletion of the disambiguation is too rigorous. Now it is more difficult for a user to find any information about the company called Atego. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chjb (talk • contribs) 20:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

How about moving the Aonix article to Atego? The Merc one is Mercedes-Benz Atego. A hatnote can be put on the Aonix based one for the Mercedes lorry. A disam page for an article starting Mercedes and one called Aonix would look silly. Aonix would stay as a redirect. Peridon (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

But not tonight - did something to my back lifting and repotting a rather large cactus. Bath and bed for me... Peridon (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

moving the Aonix article to Atego sounds good. It could help to improve the Aonix/Atego article. ...and in fact the disamb would not be necessary. -- Chjb (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

• News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news

• In the news: Wikipedia users name "superinjunction celebrities"; brief news

• WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case

• Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Please have a gentlelook!

Sir , please join [1]and give your opinion! Thanks Rirunmot (talk) 19:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Boubaker Polynomials (some information)

Dear Peridon, your neutrality and impartiality were the single pretty things in the last discussions.

You have seen that the debate was not only about Maths... now you should know that Polynomials are an important thing in Maths with hundreds of related pages in WP...

You can have a look on the references i.e. Meixner-Type Results for Riordan Arrays and Associated Integer Sequences, Chapter 6: The Boubaker polynomials (by Paul Barry, Aoife Hennessy and Modelling Nonlinear Bivariate Dependence Using the Boubaker polynomials (by E. Gargouri-Ellouze, N. Sher Akbar, S. Nadeem)... or there [2]

and you will be astonished from the fact of deleting this page 'for non notablilty??!!'

Have a good day and give your neutral opinion, it is more valuable than 100 others, believe me! Thanks Rirunmot (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2011 (UTC)