Jump to content

Talk:Gas laws: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
merge?
Line 5: Line 5:
== Merger proposal ==
== Merger proposal ==


I propose that [[Gas laws]] be merged into [[Gas]]. I think that the content in the Gas laws article can easily be explained in the context of Gas, and the Gas article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Foo will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. [[User:Katanada|Katanada]] ([[User talk:Katanada|talk]]) 07:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
I propose that [[Gas laws]] be merged into [[Gas]]. I think that the content in the Gas laws article can easily be explained in the context of Gas, and the Gas article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Gas laws will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. [[User:Katanada|Katanada]] ([[User talk:Katanada|talk]]) 07:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


== Other talk ==
== Other talk ==

Revision as of 05:37, 9 May 2011

WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChemistry Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal

I propose that Gas laws be merged into Gas. I think that the content in the Gas laws article can easily be explained in the context of Gas, and the Gas article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Gas laws will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Katanada (talk) 07:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other talk

Ideal gas and Gas laws are both currently stubs. They both deal with the same topic, as far as I can tell: Gas laws are laws of Ideal Gases, and Ideal Gases are hypothetical gases which obey those laws. Does anyone have objections to me merging the two & leaving one as a redirect? (and which one to choose as the main page?) -- Tarquin 04:59 Jul 30, 2002 (PDT)

Hmm... how about we axe everything under the summary? I mean, we really don't need brief summaries of two different random gas laws when there are individual entries for them. I think we should leave this up otherwise, because I think someone looking up "gas laws" wants a brief overview of various gas laws... maybe they're looking for one in particular, or wants to know the major ones. Have a link to ideal gases, sure, but not the whole page... anyway, my 2 cents. Lepidoptera 03:59, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).==Potential Inconsistancy?== Is it a contradiction between this article, where:

p=const*T or p/T=const

and the Law of Charles and Gay-Lussac, where:

T/V=const or V/T=const

or am I wrong? First version presumes V=const, the second p=const. Could someone explain this to me in here? Excuse my language but it's not my native. C4 10:57, 6 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

There's no inconsistancy. There are three laws: Charles, Boyle's, and Gay-Lassac. In Charles's law, you assume that pressure is constant, and V1/T1=V2/T2. In Boyle's law, you assume that temperature is constant, and P1V1=P2V2. In Gay-Lassac's law, you assume that volume is constant, and P1/T1=P2/T2.

Someone got the brilliant idea that you could combine all these individual laws into one law, called the Combined Gas Law, which states that (P1V1)/T1= (P2V2)/T2 Lepidoptera

The gas laws are valid only for special conditions and ideal gas behavior. Ideal gas properties (laws) operate only when attractions between neighboring gas molecules are small compared to their average kinetic energy. The volume of the space available has to be big compared to the size of the gas particles.

Boyles law, P1V1 = P2V2 is valid only when the temperature and number of mols of gas are constant.

Charles law V1/ T1 = V2/T2 is valid only when the number of mols of gas and the pressure are constant.

All of these describe what happens to a fixed amount of gas (constant mols) when one variable in the combined gas law is held constant.Moleculedoctor (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[1][2][reply]

Graham's law

Graham's law, named after Thomas Graham, states that the kinetic energy of two samples of different gases at the same temperature is identical.

I don't think that it says any such thing - see Talk:Graham's law. Cutler 13:38, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, Graham's law is about diffusion... Lepidoptera 03:54, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Boyle's Law

If an exhaust pump is connected to a fixed 100cm^3 flask, the volume of liquid swept out by the piston is 25cm^3 each stroke and the pressure in the vessel is originally 1 atm, what is the pressure in the flask after 2 strokes?

Homework question?

Please do not come on Wikipedia looking for help on specific homework. There's Wikianswers or other boards for this purpose.74.131.137.194 (talk) 23:58, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of SI units

I think the article should be converted to SI units. The official unit for pressure is Pascal, not atmosphere. The unit for volume is m^3, not liters.

Disputed

Do the units even matter as long as they are persistence throughout the equation on which one uses for each of the three "things"? In other words, the article needs to mention whether the units have to be in those mentioned for the laws to work. I don't think they do. Bayerischermann 01:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right; I have made a suitable addition. --Runcorn 19:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed physical quantities, hence quantity relationship equations, are independent of units as long as you use a coherent system such as the SI. What isn't independent of units is the value of constants. 195.23.97.225 14:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that the article already says that.--Runcorn 21:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification of purpose?

The lead implies that the article is describing the historical "gas laws" rather then a detailed treatment of the laws themselves - better placed elsewhere. Have tidied up a bit to emphasise this. Pdch (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]