User talk:Deguef

Welcome

Hello, Deguef! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 19:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Italy, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[::User:Goochelaar|Goochelaar]] ([[::User talk:Goochelaar|talk]]) 21:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Request

Could you, please, confirm whether the source (I assume you have it; correct me if I am mistaken, pls) mentions the words "ethnic cleansing". [1] Thank you very much. From my personal experience, WP places a lot of importance on citations, effectively delegating the responsibility for any content to the sources. Dc76\^talk 14:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Answer

The source refers specifically to the exodus of ethnic Italians. If the ethnic structure of the inhabitants of a territory is overturned by force, then it is ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing does not mean necessarily genocide and certainly I would not use in this case the term "genocide" as I woud do, instead, in the case of Armenians in Anatolia. I would not use the term genocide for Srebrenica, but only massacre in a framework of a policy of ethnic cleansing. This source as well as other Italian sources do mention the words "ethnic cleansing" for the exodus of Italians. Even the President of the Republic of Italy Giorgio Napolitano made use of this term (pulizia etnica) in his official speaches for the day of the memory on 10th February 2007 and on 10th February 2008. However, governments of Croatia and Slovenia dont accept these words. According to these governments, murders of "foibe" and exodus involved as victims of communist guerilla not only ethnic Italians, but also thousands of non-communist ethnic Croatians and Slovenians --Deguef (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

propaganda

purtroppo questo sito è utilizzato da gentaglia che vuole fare solo propaganda: conosci i fanatici user:DIREKTOR e user:AlasdairGreen27 che forse sono lo stesso tizio ma queste utenze continuano a far danni. T'invito a controllare foibe massacres e Istrian exodus: potresti annullare questo ennesimo vandalismo del famigerato slavo. Te lo chiedo perchè tu non puoi esser accusato di utenza clone, difatti tale slavo accusa tutti coloro che si oppongono alla sua agenda politica di esser cloni: ha avuto molti blocchi quindi, se insiste a imporre propaganda ultra nazionalista croata, puoi segnalarlo in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents dove è già stato ben descritto numerose volte. Ossequi,--MILAZERO (talk) 10:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Italian economists

You said "Other most relevant Italian economists should be added to the list" - that is, the category for Italian economists.

Wikipedia category pages aren't meant to be all-inclusive. Rather, they indicate all the pages that have the relevant category tag (in this case, [[category:Italian economists]]). If an article doesn't exist, or it exists but doesn't contain that category tag, then it won't be included in the category. Fortunately, this is easy to fix: just edit the article (you may need to create it first!) and add the category tag at the end.

Good luck. DS (talk) 13:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

evidenza

professore carissimo, qui non poche persone vogliono occultare l'evidenza facendo vandalismo ma osano accusare di vandalismo persino chi aggiunge fonti ufficiali del parlamento italiano! Per onestà intellettuale le chiedo di ripristinare tale contributo: l'unione fà la forza! Questo progetto richiede molta pazienza. Alla prossima e auguri di tante belle cose —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

ho comunicato e denunciato: User talk:Jimbo Wales#Persistent harassment against Italian users; professore, si unisce a noi?--MILAZERO (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Mi scuso, ma sono poco pratico di Wikipedia. Non conosco i regolamenti. Mi sono accorto che diverse voci alle quali avevo apportato correzioni o arricchimenti hanno poi subito vandalismo. Presumo siano opera di slavi o di loro fiancheggiatori. Strano adirsi, ma le notizie che riguardano la Germania sono più rispettate. Ritengo che la vicenda delle foibe sia stata indubbiamente una pulizia etnica. Sono invece molto pi guardingo nell'uso del termine genocidio di cui oggi anche in sede ONU si abusa. Userei genocidio per gli armeni di Turchia, per gli ebrei e per i tutsi del Ruanda, ma certo non per il Kosovo, per Sebrenica, per Marzabotto, per Katyn o per Fantana Alba. Genocidio a mio avviso significa la pianificazione dello sterminio di un popolo. Attendo istruzioni.--Deguef (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

condivido le tue opinioni ma il problema è che certi amministratori sono totalmente ignoranti riguardo le pulizie etniche ordinate da Broz Tito dopo la seconda guerra mondiale quindi mettono al bando tutte le utenze che insistono su tali argomenti: oltre italiani, furono massacrati pure tedeschi e ungheresi. Potresti inserire fonti riguardo la pulizia etnica in foibe massacres e National Memorial Day of the Exiles and Foibe poi vediamo se i soliti idioti vandalizzeranno ancora. Ciao —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.126.34 (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

un utente croato vandalizza ossessivamente l'articolo riguardante Broz Tito eliminando tutte le fonti che denunciano i crimini del dittatore. Dopo tanti blocchi persevera nella sua agenda politica e di propaganda attaccando particolarmente utenze italiane con la complicità di alcuni amministratori! Il suo tipo di propaganda è ossessivo e distruttivo: rimuove sempre le fonti contro la sua agenda politica; nell'articolo su Broz Tito rimuove ogni riferimento alle foibe e a qualsiasi crimine compiuto dal dèspota slavo:

[2]

[3]

[4]

Potresti intervenire? Questa persona opera nello stesso modo in tutti gli articoli riguardanti la ex Iugoslavia! Ciao,--Mengardo (talk) 12:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)