Jump to content

Talk:Jesper Olsen (runner): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Please respond rather than deleting.
NEUTRAILITY ISSUE: - please repond rather than delete. There is an issue of enormous bias here.
Line 19: Line 19:
Of the 18 references there are now 12 from secondary sources. Better? [[User:CanadianLinuxUser|CanadianLinuxUser]] ([[User talk:CanadianLinuxUser|talk]]) 23:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Of the 18 references there are now 12 from secondary sources. Better? [[User:CanadianLinuxUser|CanadianLinuxUser]] ([[User talk:CanadianLinuxUser|talk]]) 23:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


==NEUTRAILITY ISSUE==
==NEUTRALITY ISSUE==
(as posted on Moonriddengirl's page, so please stop concealing other's opposition to your control of this page)
(as posted on Moonriddengirl's page, so please stop concealing other's opposition to your control of this page)



Revision as of 00:20, 14 June 2011

WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconDenmark Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRunning Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
To-do list:
  1. tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}}
  2. adding assessment and importance parameters when missing
  3. find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs
  4. adopt an article and promote it to GA


PS ... thanks for the improvements from the valid editors. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lack of sources

Of the 18 references there are now 12 from secondary sources. Better? CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NEUTRALITY ISSUE

(as posted on Moonriddengirl's page, so please stop concealing other's opposition to your control of this page)

The article on "Jesper Olsen (runner)" is bias and the person who edits this article the most (and aggressively monitors it) appears to control it, believe they own it and clearly has a vested interest in promoting it. Wikipedia is not about owning a page and promoting your friends or creating a page about unknowns like Jesper Olsen, who has not achieved anything. (No world records ratified and using only his own web site or friend's blogs as references). This article is far too promotional and needs *complete neutrality*, something it sorely lacks. I believe it should get deleted and if he does achieve something at a later date, then add it, but at present its promo fluff. At very best You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.
as well as