Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Guoguo12 2: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) →removed from discussion at Oppose !Vote #1: inappropriate TCO comments |
Lovetinkle (talk | contribs) →removed from discussion at Oppose !Vote #1: Chill Sandy. |
||
Line 223: | Line 223: | ||
::::::::::You know what a sadist does to a masochist? [[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 01:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
::::::::::You know what a sadist does to a masochist? [[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 01:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
::::::::::: Reign it in, TCO-- inappropriate. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 09:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
::::::::::: Reign it in, TCO-- inappropriate. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 09:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::::::::: Lighten up Sandy. I'm as concerned about this candidacy as you are, but picking unnecessary fights with other editors will only lead to unnecessary drama which might distract from the matters at hand. [[User:Lovetinkle|Miss E. Lovetinkle]] ([[User talk:Lovetinkle|talk]]) 09:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
|||
--[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
--[[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 03:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:24, 21 June 2011
X!'s Edit Counter Username: Guoguo12 User groups: reviewer, rollbacker First edit: Mar 14, 2008 20:01:25 Unique pages edited: 6,560 Average edits per page: 1.69 Live edits: 10,284 Deleted edits: 771 Total edits (including deleted): 11,055 Namespace Totals Article 5212 50.68% Talk 203 1.97% User 286 2.78% User talk 2928 28.47% Wikipedia 1240 12.06% Wikipedia talk 270 2.63% File 10 0.10% MediaWiki talk 3 0.03% Template 89 0.87% Template talk 31 0.30% Help 3 0.03% Help talk 4 0.04% Category 5 0.05% Namespace Totals Pie Chart Month counts 2008/03 1 2008/04 0 2008/05 0 2008/06 0 2008/07 0 2008/08 0 2008/09 0 2008/10 0 2008/11 0 2008/12 0 2009/01 2 2009/02 2 2009/03 7 2009/04 15 2009/05 27 2009/06 0 2009/07 9 2009/08 3 2009/09 0 2009/10 1 2009/11 23 2009/12 2 2010/01 6 2010/02 14 2010/03 85 2010/04 30 2010/05 65 2010/06 546 2010/07 572 2010/08 687 2010/09 893 2010/10 717 2010/11 903 2010/12 880 2011/01 1424 2011/02 688 2011/03 701 2011/04 606 2011/05 919 2011/06 456 Top edited pages Article 69 - Hollywood_Walk_of_Fame 63 - Table_tennis 59 - Battle_of_Atlanta 57 - USA_Table_Tennis 49 - Southeast_Asia_Treaty_Organization 34 - Women's_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia 15 - Herbert_Hoover_Middle_School_(Potomac,_Maryland) 15 - Maryland_Classic_Youth_Orchestras 14 - 1578_in_art 12 - Julian_Allen Talk 20 - Hollywood_Walk_of_Fame 10 - Southeast_Asia_Treaty_Organization/GA1 8 - Battle_of_Atlanta 8 - Table_tennis 8 - Battle_of_Atlanta/GA1 4 - Love_Lost_(Four_Freshmen_album) 4 - P_versus_NP_problem 3 - The_Virginian_(character) 2 - Tesco_Clubcard 2 - TAI_Hürkuş User 172 - Guoguo12 38 - Guoguo12/monobook.js 5 - Guoguo12/huggle2.css 5 - Guoguo12/huggle.css 4 - Supernova2244/Galaxy_legion 4 - Guoguo12/Sandbox 3 - Cogware 3 - Guoguo12/Essays 2 - Guoguo12/Editnotice 2 - JNW User talk 178 - Guoguo12 33 - Sumsum2010 20 - Nolelover 12 - WikiCopter 8 - Picopa 7 - Cogware 7 - Wayne_Slam 6 - Katharineamy 6 - Glimmer721 6 - Balksoinw Wikipedia 69 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 50 - Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop/Top_4/2010_Users_... 42 - Huggle/Whitelist 32 - Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop/Eight_Requests 30 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/March_Mini 29 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2010/October 29 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/April/Log 29 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/Instructions 28 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/February/Track 26 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/April/Track Wikipedia talk 115 - WikiProject_Wikify 13 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2010/December 9 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/February 7 - Requests_for_adminship 7 - WikiProject_Wikify/Coordination/2011_Voting 6 - WikiProject_Wikipedia_Awards 5 - WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/2011/April 4 - WikiProject_Table_tennis 3 - Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-01-03/In_the_news 3 - RfA_reform_2011/Radical_alternatives File 4 - Usatt-small.gif 3 - Washington_Middle_School_NJ.JPG 2 - Health_South_Largo_pmr01.jpg 1 - MCYO_LOGO_small.gif MediaWiki talk 3 - Recentchangestext Template 33 - Vandalism_information 10 - Backlog_progress_bar 6 - Backlog_progress_bar/doc 5 - Announcements/Community_bulletin_board 3 - Wikify/tutorial 2 - X1 2 - Centralized_discussion 2 - Template_sandbox 2 - Wikify/doc 1 - Wikify_Badge Template talk 21 - Did_you_know 6 - Wikify 2 - Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia_talk:RfA_reform_2011/Ra... 1 - Battles_of_the_War_of_1812 1 - Feedbackreply-sm Help 2 - Wikipedia:_The_Missing_Manual 1 - Pending_changes Help talk 3 - Wikipedia:_The_Missing_Manual 1 - Editing Category 2 - WikiProject_Wikify_participants 1 - Actor_stubs 1 - Ancient_Egyptian_musical_instruments 1 - English_politician_stubs
removed from discussion at Oppose !Vote #1
- You do realize that without any rationale at all, your opinion will hold no weight when the RfA is closed? --The Σ talkcontribs 00:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Er, I would not suggest laying into any of the opposes like that. FWIW, we could apply that same rational to the supports. :P Nolelover Talk·Contribs 00:46, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Amusing. Like your logic Nolelover! OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 00:59, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- We'd better stop this before it gets out of hand. Either take it to a talk page or stop altogether. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 01:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- If you're talking about what he said to me, I took it as a compliment, so no problems here. Just trying to calm things down. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 01:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely a compliment Nolelover. I never answer these questions, so not sure why it was asked. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 01:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Come on, y'all. Feel the love. If you need to spin up at anyone do it to me. I get off on it! TCO (talk) 01:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely a compliment Nolelover. I never answer these questions, so not sure why it was asked. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 01:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- If you're talking about what he said to me, I took it as a compliment, so no problems here. Just trying to calm things down. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 01:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- We'd better stop this before it gets out of hand. Either take it to a talk page or stop altogether. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 01:02, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- You do realize that without any rationale at all, your opinion will hold no weight when the RfA is closed? --The Σ talkcontribs 00:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm stepping away now... --The Σ talkcontribs 01:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- You know what a sadist does to a masochist? TCO (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Reign it in, TCO-- inappropriate. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 09:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Lighten up Sandy. I'm as concerned about this candidacy as you are, but picking unnecessary fights with other editors will only lead to unnecessary drama which might distract from the matters at hand. Miss E. Lovetinkle (talk) 09:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Reign it in, TCO-- inappropriate. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 09:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- You know what a sadist does to a masochist? TCO (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm stepping away now... --The Σ talkcontribs 01:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
As an oppose vote with no rationale is not harming the candidate very much (unlike, say, a "neutral" comment with some out-of context diffs that supposedly show the candidate's poor judgement: other people will use that as a reason to vote oppose), it is usually good for the candidate if no oppose rationales are given. And that is independent of the question whether the bureaucrats will count the vote or not. (They should: "I do not trust the candidate, but want others to make up their own mind about him/her instead of considering what I think" is a perfectly good reason to oppose without making the reason public). —Kusma (t·c) 07:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)