Jump to content

User talk:Stevenknowsyoda54: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="usermessage plainlinks"><div class="plainlinks">You have one [[{{#if: {{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!#top}}|<span style="color:#002BB8;"><span title="Special:Mytalk">new message</span></span>]] ([[{{#if: {{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|{{#if: {{{1|}}}|{{{1}}}|GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!#top}}}}|<span style="color:#002BB8;"><span title="Special:Mytalk">from the governator</span></span>]]). </div></div>





Revision as of 03:00, 9 July 2011


July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:SummerPhD. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:SummerPhD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cut it out! This is not kindergarten. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the counter, thats all!!!! By the looks of it, you appear to kindergarden. It says specifically to update the counter when you vandalize the page.

OK, I've unblocked you. Now find something useful to do or you'll be blocked again. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Nelly, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stevenknowsyoda54 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, you dont have to unblock before the time expires, But let me ask you this, I'd like multiple opinions, Do you think that was kinda or even extremely funny??? Stevenknowsyoda54 (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Does anybody think that [edit] is funny???

This user does not want to be your friend.