User talk:Ieuan Sant: Difference between revisions
Ieuan Sant (talk | contribs) |
Ieuan Sant (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Confessio Londinensis]]== |
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Confessio Londinensis]]== |
||
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:Confessio Londinensis]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A1|section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. |
[[Image:Ambox warning_pn.svg|48px|left]] A tag has been placed on [[:Confessio Londinensis]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#A1|section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. |
||
== August 2010 == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Your recent edits removed content from [[:Talk:Guido de Bres]]. ''You must not delete content form article talk pages. If you persist in this behaviour you will be blocked.'' [[User:Jezhotwells|Jezhotwells]] ([[User talk:Jezhotwells|talk]]) 18:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
I assumed I could control my own talk page, if it is not allowed I will respect the rules in future. [[User:Ieuan Sant|Ieuan Sant]] ([[User talk:Ieuan Sant#top|talk]]) 20:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:You can edit your own talk page ([[User talk:Ieuan Sant]]) at will (although it's not acceptable to modify others' posts), but you can't remove your posts or modify others' posts from article talk pages like [[Talk:Guido de Bres]] and others' talk pages. See this tutorial: [[Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Collaborating with Other Editors/Communicating with Your Fellow Editors]], especially the two "Editing or Deleting Existing Comments" sections (one for article talk pages, one for user talk pages). [[User:Markussep|Markussep]] <sup>[[User talk:Markussep|Talk]]</sup> 21:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
There isn't a lot of data available for the London Confession but it is a very important confession of faith an needs patience to see it develop. The problems of Wikki is that well intentioned edits and start up pages are often killed dead by enthusiastic editors who use the rules for their own purposes. The Wikki will not develop well unless people work together. |
|||
== A Memory Guide to Help me Remember how to Treat Newcomers with Friendliness and Patience == |
== A Memory Guide to Help me Remember how to Treat Newcomers with Friendliness and Patience == |
Revision as of 12:45, 7 August 2011
Welcome!
|
Your recent edits
Speedy deletion nomination of Confessio Londinensis
A tag has been placed on Confessio Londinensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader.
A Memory Guide to Help me Remember how to Treat Newcomers with Friendliness and Patience
New members are prospective contributors and are therefore Wikipedia's most valuable resource. We must treat newcomers with kindness and patience — nothing scares potentially valuable contributors away faster than hostility. It is impossible for a newcomer to be completely familiar with all of the policies, guidelines, and community standards of Wikipedia before they start editing. Even the most experienced editors may need a gentle reminder from time to time.
Contents 1 Please do not bite the newcomers 2 How to avoid being a "biter" 3 What to do if you feel you have "bitten" or have been bitten 4 Common newcomer errors 5 Ignorantia juris may excuse 6 See also
[edit] Please do not bite the newcomers
Understand that newcomers are both necessary for and valuable to the community. By empowering newcomers, we can improve the diversity of knowledge, perspectives, and ideals on Wikipedia, thereby preserving its neutrality and integrity as a resource and ultimately increasing its value. In fact, it has been found that newcomers are responsible for adding the majority of lasting content to Wikipedia (i.e., substantive edits); while insiders and administrators are responsible for a large bulk of total edits, these often involve tweaking, reverting, and rearranging content.[1]
Remember, our motto and our invitation to the newcomer is be bold. We have a set of rules, standards, and traditions, but they must not be applied in such a way as to thwart the efforts of newcomers who take that invitation at face value. A newcomer brings a wealth of ideas, creative energy, and experience from other areas that, current rules and standards aside, have the potential to better our community and Wikipedia as a whole. It may be that the rules and standards need revising or expanding; perhaps what the newcomer is doing "wrong" may ultimately improve Wikipedia. Observe for a while and, if necessary, ask what the newcomer is trying to achieve before concluding that their efforts are substandard or that they are simply "wrong."
If a newcomer seems to have made a small mistake (e.g., forgetting to put book titles in italics), try to correct it yourself: do not slam the newcomer. Remember, this is a place where anyone may edit and therefore it is in every sense each person's responsibility to edit, rather than to criticize or supervise others. Do not use bad manners or swear at newcomers, or they may not want to contribute to this website again.
Ieuan Sant (talk) 10:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Ieuan Sant (talk) 10:28, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Ieuan Sant (talk) 10:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Abuse of process
Abuse of process is related to gaming. It involves knowingly trying to use the communally agreed and sanctioned processes described by some policies, to advance a purpose for which they are clearly not intended. Abuse of process is disruptive, and depending on circumstances may be also described as gaming the system, personal attack, or disruption to make a point. Communally agreed processes are intended to be used in good faith.