Jump to content

City quality of life indices: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 447629090 by 59.167.126.79 (talk)
Tag: references removed
Line 75: Line 75:
{{clr}}
{{clr}}


==World's Most Livable Cities==
==Quality of living survey==
⚫
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; width:30%;" |-

! colspan=4 |'''[[Mercer Human Resource Consulting|Mercer]] 2010 [[Quality of Living Survey]]'''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mercer.com/qualityoflivingpr#City_Ranking_Tables |title=News Release: 2010 Mercer Quality of Living survey |publisher=Mercer.com |date=2010-05-26 |accessdate=2011-03-27}}</ref>
⚫
{| class="wikitable" style="width:30%; float:right;"
⚫
|-
! colspan=4 |'''The Economist's World's Most Liveable Cities 2011 (Top 10)'''<ref>{{cite news|author=Business travel Gulliver |url=http://www.economist.com/blogs/gulliver/2011/02/liveability_ranking |title=Liveability ranking: Where the livin' is easiest |publisher=The Economist |date= |accessdate=2011-03-27}}</ref>
|-
|-
|
|
|'''City'''
|'''City'''
|'''Country'''
|'''Country'''
Line 88: Line 85:
|-
|-
| 1
| 1
| [[Melbourne]]
⚫
| {{flagcountry|Australia}}
⚫
| 97.5
⚫
|-
⚫
| 2
| [[Vienna]]
| [[Vienna]]
| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
| {{flagcountry|Austria}}
| 97.4
| 108.6
⚫
|-
⚫
| 2
⚫
| [[Zurich]]
| {{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
| 108
|-
|-
| 3
| 3
⚫
| [[Geneva]]
| {{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
⚫
| 107.9
⚫
|-
⚫
| rowspan=2|4
⚫
| [[Auckland]]
⚫
| {{flagcountry|New Zealand}}
⚫
| 107.4
⚫
|-
| [[Vancouver]]
| [[Vancouver]]
| {{flagcountry|Canada}}
| {{flagcountry|Canada}}
| 97.4
| 107.4
⚫
|-
⚫
| 6
| [[Düsseldorf]]
⚫
| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
⚫
| 107.2
|-
|-
| rowspan=2| 7
⚫
| 4
| [[Frankfurt am Main|Frankfurt]]
⚫
| [[Toronto]]
| {{flagcountry|Canada}}
| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
| 97.2
| 107
|-
|-
⚫
| [[Munich]]
⚫
| 5
⚫
| {{flagcountry|Germany}}
⚫
| [[Calgary]]
| 107
⚫
| {{flagcountry|Canada}}
⚫
| 96.6
|-
|-
| 6
| 9
| [[Helsinki]]
| [[Bern]]
| {{flagcountry|Finland}}
| {{flagcountry|Switzerland}}
| 96.2
| 106.5
|-
|-
| 7
| 10
| [[Sydney]]
| [[Sydney]]
| {{flagcountry|Australia}}
| {{flagcountry|Australia}}
| 96.1
| 106.3
⚫
|-
⚫
| rowspan=2|8
| [[Perth, Western Australia|Perth]]
⚫
| {{flagcountry|Australia}}
| 95.9
⚫
|-
⚫
| [[Adelaide]]
| {{flagcountry|Australia}}
| 95.9
|-
| 10
⚫
| [[Auckland]]
⚫
| {{flagcountry|New Zealand}}
| 95.7
|}
|}


[[File:Stephansdom Vienna July 2008 (27)-Stephansdom Vienna July 2008 (31).jpg|thumb|left|[[Vienna]], [[Austria]]]]
[[File:Melbourne Docklands - Yarras Edge - marina panorama.jpg|thumb|left|The city of [[Melbourne]] in [[Australia]] was ranked as the world's most livable city in 2011<ref>[http://blogs.wsj.com/scene/2011/08/30/melbourne-tops-livability-survey/ Melbourne Tops Livability Survey]</ref>]]
The [[Economist Intelligence Unit]]'s livability also uses data from the Mercer consulting group and shows cities in Canada, Australia, Austria, Finland and New Zealand as the ideal destinations thanks to a widespread availability of goods and services, low personal risk and an effective infrastructure. It does not take into account the [[cost of living]] as a factor in 'livability'. The Economist Intelligence Unit has been criticized by the [[New York Times]] for being overly anglocentric, stating that "The Economist clearly equates livability with speaking English."<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/27/opinion/27iht-edgreenway.html?ref=global-home The Best Place to Live?] 2010/05/27 [[New York Times]] </ref>

The August 2011 report placed [[Melbourne]], [[Australia]] as the most livable city in the world, with [[Vienna]], [[Austria]] taking second place followed by [[Vancouver]], [[Canada]]. <ref>[http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=liveabilityAug2011 eiu.com] August 2011</ref>


The [[Mercer Human Resource Consulting|Mercer]] [[Quality of Living Survey]] is released annually, comparing 221 cities based on 39 criteria.
Other [[Canada|Canadian]] cities also ranked highly in the survey, with [[Toronto]] and [[Calgary]] holding the 4th and 5th positions respectively. Three other [[Australia|Australian]] cities ([[Sydney]] at 7th and [[Perth, Western Australia|Perth]] and [[Adelaide, South Australia|Adelaide]] tied at 8th) claimed positions in the top ten.
New York is given a baseline score of 100 and other cities are rated in comparison. Important criteria are [[safety]], [[education]], [[hygiene]], [[health care]], [[culture]], [[Natural environment|environment]], [[recreation]], political-economic stability and [[public transport]]ation.<ref>[http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100212/lf_nm_life/us_cities_living Olympics host Vancouver ranked world's most liveable city accessed 12 February 2010]</ref>


The list helps multi-national companies decide where to open offices or plants, and how much to pay employees.
[[Harare]], [[Zimbabwe]] was rated the worst city in the world to call home. [[Africa]]n and [[South Asia]]n cities were generally the worst performing in the EIU's rankings.


In the 2010 list of cities, the top of the list is dominated by [[Europe]], Canada, Australia and New Zealand; and Switzerland and Germany both have 3 cities in the top 10. The first entries from other countries are Singapore at 22, the USA at 31, and Japan at 37. [[Baghdad]] was at the bottom of the list. Of the 25 cities at the bottom, 15 are in [[Africa]]. Compared to lists for previous years, cities in [[South Asia]] (mainly [[India]]), [[East Asia]] (mainly [[China]]), the [[Middle East]] and [[Eastern Europe]] are clearly on the rise.
[[Pittsburgh]] ranked 29th tops American cities in the list just ahead of [[Honolulu]] at 30th and [[Los Angeles]] (which rose to) 44th and New York (which held onto) 56th place.


Mercer also has a 'Personal Safety' list, which is also dominated by EU and Swiss cities: the top five are [[Luxembourg (city)|Luxembourg]], [[Bern]], [[Geneva]], [[Helsinki]] and [[Zurich]].
[[London]] moved up one place to 53rd while [[Paris]] came in at number 16.


2010 year’s ranking also identifies the cities with the best eco-ranking based on water availability and drinkability, waste removal, quality of sewage systems, air pollution and traffic congestion. [[Calgary]] is at the top of this index (score 145.7), followed by [[Honolulu]] in second place (score 145.1) and [[Ottawa]] and [[Helsinki]] in joint third (score 139.9). [[Wellington]] in [[New Zealand]] (5), [[Minneapolis]] (6), [[Adelaide]] (7) and [[Copenhagen]] fill the next four slots, while [[Kobe]], [[Oslo]] and [[Stockholm]] share ninth place. [[Port-au-Prince]] in [[Haiti]] ranks at the bottom of this table with a score of only 27.8.<ref>[http://www.mercer.com/qualityofliving Mercer's 2010 Quality of Living survey highlights - Global]</ref>
The top Asian city was the Japanese city of [[Osaka]] at number 12, tying with [[Geneva]], and beating the Japanese capital of [[Tokyo]], which was placed 18th.<ref name="theage1">{{cite news|url=http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/melbourne-beats-sydney-in-worlds-most-liveable-city-rankings-20110221-1b29d.html |title=World's most liveable cities 2011 &#124; Melbourne beats Sydney |publisher=Theage.com.au |date= 2011-02-21|accessdate=2011-03-27}}</ref>
<!--
PLEASE NOTE: Do not add the actual list to this article. The list is copyrighted under U.S. law. This article should contain information about this list, but not the list itself. If you have questions, please discuss on the talk page.
-->
{{clr}}
{{clr}}


Revision as of 09:40, 31 August 2011

The world's most livable cities is an informal name given to any list of cities as they rank on a reputable annual survey of living conditions. Two examples are the Mercer Quality of Living Survey and The Economist's World's Most Livable Cities (using data from Mercer as well).

Livability rankings are designed for use by employers assigning hardship allowances as part of job relocation.[1] There have been numerous arguments over the expansion of livability rankings for other purposes.[2][3][4][5][6] However, the annual city rankings attract extensive media coverage, are a popular topic of discussion and have attracted the attention of even the White House.[7]

Quality of living survey

Mercer 2010 Quality of Living Survey[8]
City Country Rating
1 Vienna  Austria 108.6
2 Zurich   Switzerland 108
3 Geneva   Switzerland 107.9
4 Auckland  New Zealand 107.4
Vancouver  Canada 107.4
6 Düsseldorf  Germany 107.2
7 Frankfurt  Germany 107
Munich  Germany 107
9 Bern   Switzerland 106.5
10 Sydney  Australia 106.3
Vienna, Austria

The Mercer Quality of Living Survey is released annually, comparing 221 cities based on 39 criteria. New York is given a baseline score of 100 and other cities are rated in comparison. Important criteria are safety, education, hygiene, health care, culture, environment, recreation, political-economic stability and public transportation.[9]

The list helps multi-national companies decide where to open offices or plants, and how much to pay employees.

In the 2010 list of cities, the top of the list is dominated by Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand; and Switzerland and Germany both have 3 cities in the top 10. The first entries from other countries are Singapore at 22, the USA at 31, and Japan at 37. Baghdad was at the bottom of the list. Of the 25 cities at the bottom, 15 are in Africa. Compared to lists for previous years, cities in South Asia (mainly India), East Asia (mainly China), the Middle East and Eastern Europe are clearly on the rise.

Mercer also has a 'Personal Safety' list, which is also dominated by EU and Swiss cities: the top five are Luxembourg, Bern, Geneva, Helsinki and Zurich.

2010 year’s ranking also identifies the cities with the best eco-ranking based on water availability and drinkability, waste removal, quality of sewage systems, air pollution and traffic congestion. Calgary is at the top of this index (score 145.7), followed by Honolulu in second place (score 145.1) and Ottawa and Helsinki in joint third (score 139.9). Wellington in New Zealand (5), Minneapolis (6), Adelaide (7) and Copenhagen fill the next four slots, while Kobe, Oslo and Stockholm share ninth place. Port-au-Prince in Haiti ranks at the bottom of this table with a score of only 27.8.[10]

Quality of living survey

Mercer 2010 Quality of Living Survey[11]
City Country Rating
1 Vienna  Austria 108.6
2 Zurich   Switzerland 108
3 Geneva   Switzerland 107.9
4 Auckland  New Zealand 107.4
Vancouver  Canada 107.4
6 Düsseldorf  Germany 107.2
7 Frankfurt  Germany 107
Munich  Germany 107
9 Bern   Switzerland 106.5
10 Sydney  Australia 106.3
Vienna, Austria

The Mercer Quality of Living Survey is released annually, comparing 221 cities based on 39 criteria. New York is given a baseline score of 100 and other cities are rated in comparison. Important criteria are safety, education, hygiene, health care, culture, environment, recreation, political-economic stability and public transportation.[12]

The list helps multi-national companies decide where to open offices or plants, and how much to pay employees.

In the 2010 list of cities, the top of the list is dominated by Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand; and Switzerland and Germany both have 3 cities in the top 10. The first entries from other countries are Singapore at 22, the USA at 31, and Japan at 37. Baghdad was at the bottom of the list. Of the 25 cities at the bottom, 15 are in Africa. Compared to lists for previous years, cities in South Asia (mainly India), East Asia (mainly China), the Middle East and Eastern Europe are clearly on the rise.

Mercer also has a 'Personal Safety' list, which is also dominated by EU and Swiss cities: the top five are Luxembourg, Bern, Geneva, Helsinki and Zurich.

2010 year’s ranking also identifies the cities with the best eco-ranking based on water availability and drinkability, waste removal, quality of sewage systems, air pollution and traffic congestion. Calgary is at the top of this index (score 145.7), followed by Honolulu in second place (score 145.1) and Ottawa and Helsinki in joint third (score 139.9). Wellington in New Zealand (5), Minneapolis (6), Adelaide (7) and Copenhagen fill the next four slots, while Kobe, Oslo and Stockholm share ninth place. Port-au-Prince in Haiti ranks at the bottom of this table with a score of only 27.8.[13]

Most Liveable Cities Index

Monocle's Most Livable Cities Index 2010
City Country 2009
1 Munich  Germany (04)
2 Copenhagen  Denmark (02)
3 Zurich   Switzerland (01)
4 Tokyo  Japan (03)
5 Helsinki  Finland (05)
6 Stockholm  Sweden (06)
7 Paris  France (08)
8 Vienna  Austria (07)
9 Melbourne  Australia (09)
10 Madrid  Spain (12)


Munich, Germany

Since 2007 the lifestyle magazine Monocle publishes an annual list of liveable cities. The list in 2009 was named "The Most Liveable Cities Index" and presented 25 top locations for quality of life. The winning city in 2008 was Copenhagen, Denmark and the 2009 winner was Zurich, Switzerland.

Important criteria in this survey are safety/crime, international connectivity, climate/sunshine, quality of architecture, public transportation, tolerance, environmental issues and access to nature, urban design, business conditions, pro-active policy developments and medical care.

The 2010 rankings continued thus: Berlin (11), Sydney (12), Honolulu (13), Fukuoka (14), Geneva (15), Vancouver (16), Barcelona (17), Oslo (18), Montreal (19), Auckland (20), Singapore (21), Portland (22), Kyoto (23), Hamburg (24), Lisbon (25).

See also

References

  1. ^ Business travel Gulliver. "Liveability rankings: It's Vancouver, again". The Economist. Retrieved 2011-03-27. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  2. ^ Fisher, Marc. "Most Livable City: Bethesda? - Raw Fisher". Voices.washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  3. ^ "Pink Slip: We're Number 9! Worcester named 9th most livable city in the US". Pinkslipblog.blogspot.com. 2009-04-13. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  4. ^ "Houston Strategies: Why the 'Livable Cities' rankings are wrong". Houstonstrategies.blogspot.com. 2009-08-16. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  5. ^  Print!  Email! Author: 2thinknow (2010-07-07). "City rankings - Better cities rankings than livability rankings alone | Latest News | Innovation Cities Program - Analyst Reports, Index Rankings, Benchmarking Data, Workshops". Innovation-cities.com. Retrieved 2011-03-27. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ 11:54 AM. "Yawn-Forbes says Pittsburgh is the most livable city (Mexico: 2010, college) - Pennsylvania (PA) - City-Data Forum". City-data.com. Retrieved 2011-03-27.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ http://www.landlinemag.com/todays_news/Daily/2010/July10/071910/072210-01.htm
  8. ^ "News Release: 2010 Mercer Quality of Living survey". Mercer.com. 2010-05-26. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  9. ^ Olympics host Vancouver ranked world's most liveable city accessed 12 February 2010
  10. ^ Mercer's 2010 Quality of Living survey highlights - Global
  11. ^ "News Release: 2010 Mercer Quality of Living survey". Mercer.com. 2010-05-26. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  12. ^ Olympics host Vancouver ranked world's most liveable city accessed 12 February 2010
  13. ^ Mercer's 2010 Quality of Living survey highlights - Global

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=City_quality_of_life_indices&oldid=447629368"