Jump to content

Talk:Deborra-Lee Furness: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:


* IMDB has changed their statements of the year 1960 to the year 1955! [[User:Christian47|Christian47]] ([[User talk:Christian47|talk]]) 22:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
* IMDB has changed their statements of the year 1960 to the year 1955! [[User:Christian47|Christian47]] ([[User talk:Christian47|talk]]) 22:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
::Well, it seems that the issue is settled then. Even the IMDB admits now it is 1955. [[User:Mr. D. E. Mophon|Mr. D. E. Mophon]] ([[User talk:Mr. D. E. Mophon|talk]]) 07:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
::Well, it seems that the issue is settled then. Even the IMDB admits now it is 1955. [[User:Mr. D. E. Mophon|Mr. D. E. Mophon]] ([[User talk:Mr. D. E. Mophon|talk]]) 07:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)\

I'm going with 1902

Revision as of 20:24, 10 October 2011

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
WikiProject iconAustralia: Television Stub‑class
WikiProject iconDeborra-Lee Furness is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Source for her birth date?

Anonymous editors keep changing her date of birth back and forth between 1955 and 1960. Does anyone have a reliable source for either of these dates?

go with 'old as dirt'.

in IMDB it's been set to 1960. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.127.6.10 (talk) 19:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent article states age as 52 http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/we-are-family/2008/06/07/1212259194227.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.208.116 (talk) 14:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm one of those changing it to it's correct date, 1955, except I'm wrong and it's 1956. Clearly IMDB is going to have info from her agent - biased. The Age & SMH article is right, she is 52. What's the problem with that? I have endeavoured to find out officially (i.e. so that the 'other' person will believe me) but short of forcing her to show me her passport what can I do? Privacy legislation would stop everyone else telling us. I will keep changing it back to 1956 if it is changed again. love Ossberto —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ossberto (talkcontribs) 22:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone needs to stop edit warring over the birth year. This sterile edit war has been going on since at least November 2006! Just cut it out already. If we aren't sure of some biographical detail in a biography of living people, then we remove it. Edit warring over it is not acceptable. I don't know what you mean by finding out "officially" but even if you went and asked her herself, it's still not acceptable for Wikipedia. We only use reliable and verifiable third party sources and for BLPs the sourcing needs to be high quality. Anything that's user generated content like IMDB is not acceptable sourcing for a bio. In any event, I've removed the year. There's no 'rule' that says we have to include someone's year of birth and if we don't know or we aren't totally sure and there are conflicting sources then it's far better to simply leave it out. Sarah 01:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah that is a good point. I was not intending to have a war; rather I was trying to prevent disinformation. Thanks for your fix. Ossberto June 28th 2008

In case this may be of assistance ... I am able to contribute the information that Deborra-Lee was in the same graduating class as my sister at Methodist Ladies College here in Melbourne in 1973. My sister was born in November 1956, and was one of the youngest in her year level. So Deborra-Lee would be at least 52. My sister tells me Deborra-Lee is actually a year older than she is, which would make the correct birth year 1955 not 1956. However I have no documented evidence to confirm this. I saw reference to the MLC connection online at http://www.inquisitr.com/8958/does-deborra-lee-furness-make-hugh-jackman-great/ . However this is a blog site, so I assume not a verifiable source. The information I have contributed (ie my sister's knowledge) may also not be considered a verifiable source in terms of the Wikipedia guidelines - so I was not about to make any changes to the encyclopedia pages. No doubt the facts of the matter could be confirmed through further offline research. All I have done to date is check the MLC past collegian website, via my own log in, but Deborra-Lee is not listed anywhere in the past student archives there. For the time being, I thought perhaps it might be helpful at least to add the information to this talk page, which came up in a search. Rayhjay (talk) 03:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems that the issue is settled then. Even the IMDB admits now it is 1955. Mr. D. E. Mophon (talk) 07:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)\[reply]

I'm going with 1902