Talk:Target Corporation: Difference between revisions
sorry, removed. Talk section is for discussion to improve article, not a forum to discuss |
→vermont: new section |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==Areas served== |
==Areas served== |
||
I have removed Canada from the "areas served" section, as Canada is not currently being served by Target, and will not be until 2013 or 2014. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.93.99.247|65.93.99.247]] ([[User talk:65.93.99.247|talk]]) 22:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I have removed Canada from the "areas served" section, as Canada is not currently being served by Target, and will not be until 2013 or 2014. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/65.93.99.247|65.93.99.247]] ([[User talk:65.93.99.247|talk]]) 22:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== vermont == |
|||
why does it say in wiki that Target does NOT serve the state of Vermont?? |
Revision as of 09:04, 2 November 2011
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Target Corporation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Target Corporation is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate |
69.241.114.130 (talk) 03:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC) footnote 68 doesn't look to be valid anymore. Maybe the roof has changed?
Political Giving and LGBT Community Boycotts Target
Target has come under fire for large political donations to extremely anti-gay causes and candidates. They have also selecttively sued marriage equality advocates while ignoring Yes on Prop 8 solicitors. They have spent a great deal of effort scrubbing their image in the mainstream media as well as online using very heavy handed tactics. This is very important, if they want to delve into politics and site free speech, they need to allow everyone else the same privilege. The Bill of Rights still trumps corporate policy, for now... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.34.201 (talk) 21:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
"As of May 2010, the gay and lesbian community has been boycotting Target over donations to anti-gay groups and politicians." -- Minnesota Forward is not an "Anti-Gay" group, they are a political action group that has supported both Democrats and Republicans. I think the current blurb should be changed to something like: "As of May 2010, the gay and lesbian community has been boycotting Target over donations to Minnesota Forward, a bipartisan Political Action Group that funded Republican Tom Emmer in the Minnesota 2010 Gubernational Election". I really feel like the current information is very inflammatory given its lack of credibility. 174.53.138.123 (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Areas served
I have removed Canada from the "areas served" section, as Canada is not currently being served by Target, and will not be until 2013 or 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.99.247 (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
vermont
why does it say in wiki that Target does NOT serve the state of Vermont??