Jump to content

Talk:Tear gas: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:


Despite several media references to instructions for using liquid antacids to counter the effects of tear gas, this information is false. Tear gas is not an acid. Spraying liquid antacid solution on someone may increase external pain because the dust adheres more readily to wet skin and the liquid can carry the dust through clothing onto the person's skin underneath. These "defense" instructions are harmful. And by giving people a false sense of security their lives may be endangered by continued and aggravated exposure. [[User:Rick MILLER|Rick MILLER]] ([[User talk:Rick MILLER|talk]]) 00:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Despite several media references to instructions for using liquid antacids to counter the effects of tear gas, this information is false. Tear gas is not an acid. Spraying liquid antacid solution on someone may increase external pain because the dust adheres more readily to wet skin and the liquid can carry the dust through clothing onto the person's skin underneath. These "defense" instructions are harmful. And by giving people a false sense of security their lives may be endangered by continued and aggravated exposure. [[User:Rick MILLER|Rick MILLER]] ([[User talk:Rick MILLER|talk]]) 00:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

== chlorobenzylidene malononitrile ==

Why is it missing from this article? [[Special:Contributions/173.174.212.164|173.174.212.164]] ([[User talk:173.174.212.164|talk]]) 15:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:28, 27 November 2011

Tear gas

Tear gas links back to this article, which doesn't help much if people click on the links in, um, this article! 86.149.2.192 (talk) 00:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this article sucks 24.113.113.216 (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of military designations

It seems there are uncited claims on Wikipedia about the origin of the military designations CS, HS, SK, etc. I've found this source which attributes SK to "South Kensington" and HS to "Hun Stuff" - does anyone have more sources that clarify these designations? ----IsaacAA (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to tear gas

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request as the common name of the subject.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:15, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Lachrymatory agentTear gas — It seems that tear gas is the more common term. Kaldari (talk) 02:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Antacid is NOT a Defense Against Tear Gas

Despite several media references to instructions for using liquid antacids to counter the effects of tear gas, this information is false. Tear gas is not an acid. Spraying liquid antacid solution on someone may increase external pain because the dust adheres more readily to wet skin and the liquid can carry the dust through clothing onto the person's skin underneath. These "defense" instructions are harmful. And by giving people a false sense of security their lives may be endangered by continued and aggravated exposure. Rick MILLER (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

chlorobenzylidene malononitrile

Why is it missing from this article? 173.174.212.164 (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]