Jump to content

Talk:Google Pay Send: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 96.228.130.159 - ""
Line 11: Line 11:


The Business Model section looks like a PR statement. If it doesn't get fixed in the next few days, it should be removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.228.130.159|96.228.130.159]] ([[User talk:96.228.130.159|talk]]) 19:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The Business Model section looks like a PR statement. If it doesn't get fixed in the next few days, it should be removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.228.130.159|96.228.130.159]] ([[User talk:96.228.130.159|talk]]) 19:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Security section contains an ironic statement ==

In the "Security" section, the first bullet point reads as follows:
'''"The Google Wallet device never leaves the owners hands."''' I find that statement laughable. I have always been aware that debit/credit cards can be stolen by careless thieves; I had no idea that cell/smart phones are immune from thievery! What a wonderful thing it is to know that having your phone stolen from you is now officially impossible courtesy of Google! Am I alone in thinking this unusual statement doesn't belong anywhere in the article, much less in the "Security" section? [[Special:Contributions/67.182.237.57|67.182.237.57]] ([[User talk:67.182.237.57|talk]]) 07:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:47, 29 November 2011

Google Wallet

much more than a fancy credit card. It was rteally used years ago in spain but then the mobile phone company just paid your bill and added it after to your phone bill. It made the pone company the bank.Now gwallet bypasses the phone company going right back to the bank..like a credit card..big advant ids to use it for micro purchases...a beer a starbucks coffee ,a newspaper.in murcia we are testing it in our many bars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.148.97.68 (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV problems

The Business Model section looks like a PR statement. If it doesn't get fixed in the next few days, it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.130.159 (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Security section contains an ironic statement

In the "Security" section, the first bullet point reads as follows: "The Google Wallet device never leaves the owners hands." I find that statement laughable. I have always been aware that debit/credit cards can be stolen by careless thieves; I had no idea that cell/smart phones are immune from thievery! What a wonderful thing it is to know that having your phone stolen from you is now officially impossible courtesy of Google! Am I alone in thinking this unusual statement doesn't belong anywhere in the article, much less in the "Security" section? 67.182.237.57 (talk) 07:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]