Talk:Klondike derby: Difference between revisions
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Removal Discussion per Achowat== |
==Removal Discussion per Achowat== |
||
Why does the User talk:75.42.222.149 page exist? That doesn't seem to belong in an encyclopedia. Somebody delete it.[[Special:Contributions/75.42.222.149|75.42.222.149]] ([[User talk:75.42.222.149|talk]]) 20:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
Why does the User talk:75.42.222.149 page exist? That doesn't seem to belong in an encyclopedia. Somebody delete it.[[Special:Contributions/75.42.222.149|75.42.222.149]] ([[User talk:75.42.222.149|talk]]) 20:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Is there some way I can delete it? I'm going to try that. |
Revision as of 20:21, 9 December 2011
![]() | Scouting Stub‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
Rename
Rename to "klondike derby" per the [http://www.scouting.org/identity/los/los.jsp?typ=los&how=alfa&wat=K language of Scouting. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Rlevse 17:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Done. Double redirects fixed. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 17:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Unnotable
Why is this even a page? Why do stubs not have to meet notability requirements? Should they be deleted if they are never expanded upon? Can any non-notable article simply be marked as a stub to stay on Wikipedia? Why do stubs make no sense! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.222.149 (talk) 19:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's {{WP:N|notablity]] is proven through the secondary sources that talk of it. Any Scout from (at least) the Northeast Region of the BSA would be more than familair with such a contest. Compare Pinewood Derby -Achowat (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is there an article about Klondike Derby sleds? Any Scout from (at least) the NE Region would be more than familiar with Klondike Derby sleds.75.42.222.149 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why can't I make pages for things? I need to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.222.149 (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- If there was sufficient verifiable secondary sources about sleds and their construction and use, then by all means there should be an article about them. -Achowat (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- But the sources all talk about the sleds to? Why does the Derby get an Article and the Sled does not? Really, I don't think the Sleds should get an article. But I don't think the Derby should get an article all by itself either. It has, like, four sentences. That's worthless. If it were on a page with other 'common scouting events' then that would make sense. But by itself is stupid.75.42.222.149 (talk)
- Also, I have questions:
- Why do stubs not have to meet notability requirements?
- Should they be deleted if they are never expanded upon?
- Can any non-notable article simply be marked as a stub to stay on Wikipedia?
- Also, I have questions:
- But the sources all talk about the sleds to? Why does the Derby get an Article and the Sled does not? Really, I don't think the Sleds should get an article. But I don't think the Derby should get an article all by itself either. It has, like, four sentences. That's worthless. If it were on a page with other 'common scouting events' then that would make sense. But by itself is stupid.75.42.222.149 (talk)
- If there was sufficient verifiable secondary sources about sleds and their construction and use, then by all means there should be an article about them. -Achowat (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why can't I make pages for things? I need to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.42.222.149 (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank You ~~
- Is there an article about Klondike Derby sleds? Any Scout from (at least) the NE Region would be more than familiar with Klondike Derby sleds.75.42.222.149 (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Removal Discussion per Achowat
Why does the User talk:75.42.222.149 page exist? That doesn't seem to belong in an encyclopedia. Somebody delete it.75.42.222.149 (talk) 20:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Is there some way I can delete it? I'm going to try that.