Talk:Ward Cunningham: Difference between revisions
→Ward's "personal appeal": new section |
→Ward's "personal appeal": -- Now I must pay attention. |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Actually, we aren't allowed to share "our ideas," because that would be original research. He might have more accurately said that Wikipedia editors document the ideas of others. Am I right? [[Special:Contributions/174.24.80.166|174.24.80.166]] ([[User talk:174.24.80.166|talk]]) 08:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
Actually, we aren't allowed to share "our ideas," because that would be original research. He might have more accurately said that Wikipedia editors document the ideas of others. Am I right? [[Special:Contributions/174.24.80.166|174.24.80.166]] ([[User talk:174.24.80.166|talk]]) 08:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
Note: in the interview I frequently alternated between speaking of Wikipedia and of wiki in general. If I implied one could share ideas on Wikipedia it was surely a mistake that escaped copyediting. Sorry. [[User:WardCunningham|WardCunningham]] ([[User talk:WardCunningham|talk]]) 16:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== What was I talking about? == |
|||
I'm suspicious of the quote, “There are those who give like Chalmers, and those who take, like Weir & Barlow. You can tell by reading what they write.” |
|||
I remember the event, and I remember responding to a question with some discussion of identifiable writing styles and motives, but I don't recall ever citing specific cases and I don't know who/what Chalmers or Weir & Barlow might be. I suspect confusion or malice with regard to this quote. [[User:WardCunningham|WardCunningham]] ([[User talk:WardCunningham|talk]]) 16:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:10, 20 December 2011
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Software: Computing Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Undergraduate degree
Where did he get his bachelor's degree in electrical engineering? Anybody know?
error
the PPR page says it was started 1995. here it says 93
When I search for Ward Cunningham on the GAPP Microsoft site I get
- patterns & practices Search
- 0 title(s) matching search criteria.
- There are no titles that match your search. Please modify your search and try again.patterns & practices
Why is this link included in the article.
Birthdate
An anon changed "May 26" to "May 20". I've reverted because, in a quick online check, I found no site giving the May 20 date. On the other hand, it seems that most or all of the sites saying May 26 are Wikipedia mirrors. I know that Ward Cunningham himself has looked in on Wikipedia, so I'll go back to May 26, figuring that he probably looked at his own article and would've corrected an error. JamesMLane 09:34, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
It is May 26th. I thank you for your attention to detail. -- Ward
Prior use of "wiki"
The word wiki rang bells in my head for ages until I finally tracked down where I'd heard it used before.
Jasper Carrott, an English comedian, used the term when describing (as memory serves) aspects of a trip he made to Hong Kong some years ago, as part of one of his monologues.
"Wiki" and "Wikiwiki" were words he used to represent the conversation he had with Hong Kong locals when looking for something to eat.
The show aired before 1995 - give me time and I'll work out exactly when. The man may have been using the term for decades for all I know...
That's not to detract from the concept of this wiki (or to cast a slur on the slightly more well known wikiup of native North Americans).
Just to add a little more seasoning to the stew...
Peter Brooks
- You're looking for the original 24 Carrott Gold, recorded in 1990. It's listed here on Amazon. ~~ Peteb16 15:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Leaving Microsoft
Wiki founder leaves Microsoft for Eclipse October 18 2005 [news.com|http://news.com.com/2061-10795_3-5900280.html]
Image
I have another image of him from Wikimania 2006 that I think is slightly better than the current one: commons:Image:Wikimania 2006 dungodung 19.jpg. --Filip (§) 00:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Wiki
Hi What does Wiki mean in American Indian lingo??--Darrendeng 16:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki#History
May 4th 2006 AV reference
Can I include a link to the main page of An Evening With Wiki Inventor Ward Cunningham in Conversation with John Gage please, of would someone like to take this when they reading and instert it. RoddyYoung 11:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
So the same guy who invented the wiki invented XP too?
I'm sorry but someone had to say it : that's impressive. I mean, from an engineering point of view. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.57.84.165 (talk) 10:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC).
- No, Kent Beck articulated the term Extreme Programming according to his book "Extreme Programming Explained". Mac D83 (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Ward's "personal appeal"
The article has become a big vandalism target because of Ward's "personal appeal." Thank you to all the vigilant anti-vandals.
Speaking of his personal appeal, he wrote that "When we come together on Wikipedia to share our ideas we make something bigger than the sum of its parts."
Actually, we aren't allowed to share "our ideas," because that would be original research. He might have more accurately said that Wikipedia editors document the ideas of others. Am I right? 174.24.80.166 (talk) 08:07, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Note: in the interview I frequently alternated between speaking of Wikipedia and of wiki in general. If I implied one could share ideas on Wikipedia it was surely a mistake that escaped copyediting. Sorry. WardCunningham (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
What was I talking about?
I'm suspicious of the quote, “There are those who give like Chalmers, and those who take, like Weir & Barlow. You can tell by reading what they write.”
I remember the event, and I remember responding to a question with some discussion of identifiable writing styles and motives, but I don't recall ever citing specific cases and I don't know who/what Chalmers or Weir & Barlow might be. I suspect confusion or malice with regard to this quote. WardCunningham (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Oregon articles
- Mid-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Start-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in software engineering
- WikiProject Systems articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Articles with connected contributors