Talk:Pillars of Creation: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:58, 30 December 2011

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Spaceflight Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts Unassessed

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Photography Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Name

A good addition to this article would be an explanation of the name. "Pillars of Creation" is quite a fascinating title, but there's no hint as to why they have it. BrolleJr (talk) 10:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are a nurcery in top of each Pillar Thousands stars are borning all the time That´s a Creation Our System was created in that way —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anafigo (talk • contribs) 19:58, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

eroding at fingers of gas

What does that mean exatly? ChristianBxx 14:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christian75 (talk • contribs)

Einstein and Modern Physics announced wrong. Read it Here first

Wow. So we now can state as fact that events in space-time that have not happened for us (in our light cone) have happened? No wonder the lay public is confused when supposedly professional scientist talk rubbish. Either comment on how events which will occur in our future have objective reality or retract the idiocy of saying that the pillars "were" destroyed. There is no simultaneity in General/Special Relativity. Claiming that they don't exist "now" violates physics that is 100 years old.71.31.147.72 (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 What does that mean exatly? ChristianBxx 14:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)  <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Christian75|Christian75]] ([[User talk:Christian75|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Christian75|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Einstein and Modern Physics announced wrong.  Read it Here first ==
+Wow. So we now can state as fact that events in space-time that have not happened for us (in our light cone) have happened?  No wonder the lay public is confused when supposedly professional scientist talk rubbish.  Either comment on how events which will occur in our future have objective reality or retract the idiocy of saying that the pillars "were" destroyed.  There is no simultaneity in General/Special Relativity.  Claiming that they don't exist "now" violates physics that is 100 years old.[[Special:Contributions/71.31.147.72|71.31.147.72]] ([[User talk:71.31.147.72|talk]]) 14:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)