Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McKay McKinnon: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Afoxson (talk | contribs)
Line 21: Line 21:


*'''Keep''' Gets coverage for various activities of his. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 15:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Gets coverage for various activities of his. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>''']] 15:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' Dr. McKay McKinnon is both clearly and obviously notable. CNN, today, covered a Vietnam surgery that he led: http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/06/health/vietnam-tumor/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

Revision as of 04:28, 7 January 2012

McKay McKinnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable figure in our field Droliver (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A passing reference in an article (more about the patient and her weird tumor)does not notability make. Please refer to the individuals academic accomplishments, notable contributions, etc.... There is a complete absence of accomplishments you'd use to assess professional notability. This is not someone of note in contemporary plastic surgery by any stretch of the imagination.Droliver (talk) 21:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep His citations at Google Scholar are not enough to pass WP:ACADEMIC, but the press coverage unearthed by Tony the Tiger is more than enough for WP:BIO. Dr. Oliver, please familiarize yourself with the various criteria for inclusion at Wikipedia, such as WP:ACADEMIC and WP:BIO. A person may be notable as an individual, based on significant coverage by independent reliable sources (WP:BIO), even if his professional accomplishments do not establish him as a leader in his field (WP:ACADEMIC). --MelanieN (talk) 08:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]