Talk:MGM-52 Lance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:56, 19 January 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MGM-52 Lance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation Stub‑class

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / Dutch / European / German / Italian / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Rocketry Unassessed

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External Links

The GlobalSecurity link was removed as its content is not original. GlobalSecurity has simply copy-and-pasted content from the Redstone Arsenal onto its own site without acknowledging the source. This is referred to as plagiarism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.131.8.131 (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

formidable SRBM force?

I deleted the passage about US formidable SRBM force. You see, there was only one force to compare to back then, and that is USSR's SRBM force. And compared to it, USA's SRBM force was in no way formidable. USSR had far more missiles, USSR's missiles had longer range, larger warheads. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.50.118 (talk) 01:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

engine type

According to Designation Systems, the MGM-52 Lance was powered by a pair of liquid propellant rockets. Orihara (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And there's an interesting story here... The MGM-5 Corporal was the US Army's first tactical nuclear missile, and its main operational problem was its liquid fuel; Other problems were encountered early in its development and deployment but were able to be addressed, but not that one. So its replacement the MGM-29 Sergeant was solid fueled, but was in its turn replaced by the liquid fueled MGM-52 Lance. The evolution of liquid fueled rockets which made this possible is a fascinating subject which we don't seem to cover yet. Andrewa (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: MGM-52 Lance (section)

Removed. Content stolen from www.usarmygermany.com.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 :And there's an interesting story here... The [[MGM-5 Corporal]] was the US Army's first [[tactical nuclear missile]], and its main operational problem was its liquid fuel; Other problems were encountered early in its development and deployment but were able to be addressed, but not that one. So its replacement the [[MGM-29 Sergeant]] was solid fueled, but was in its turn replaced by the liquid fueled MGM-52 Lance. The evolution of liquid fueled rockets which made this possible is a fascinating subject which we don't seem to cover yet. [[User:Andrewa|Andrewa]] ([[User talk:Andrewa|talk]]) 14:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
+== RE: MGM-52 Lance (section) ==
+Removed.  Content stolen from www.usarmygermany.com.