Jump to content

Brady Campaign: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
wow, talk about revisionist historym please do not remove cited references from the encyclopedia
actually they call teflon bullies cop killers, but found no reliable source to HP claim, whole para is stupid anyway and non encyclopedic...remove
Line 87: Line 87:
===Terminology===
===Terminology===
Writer Richard Lowry said that the term "[[assault weapon]]", used in the 1994 crime bill that followed the 1993 [[Brady Bill]] is a "manufactured term".<ref name="Lowry">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=bKumwTZunZYC&pg=PA96&dq=%2B%22assault+weapon%22+%2B%22semi-automatic%22#v=onepage&q=%2B%22assault%20weapon%22%20%2B%22semi-automatic%22&f=false|title=Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years|last=Lowry|first=Richard|year=2003|publisher=Regnery|page=96|accessdate=3 July 2010}}</ref> This term is used by the Brady Campaign to refer to [[semi-automatic rifle|semi-automatic]] or self-loading rifles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/msassaultweapons |title=Federal Gun Laws Military - Style Assault Weapons |publisher=Brady Campaign |date= |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> Critics maintain this is done in order to conflate them in the public imagination with [[assault rifle]]s,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/EMorgan1.html |title=Eric C. Morgan. "Assault Rifle Legislation: Unwise and Unconstitutional." American Journal of Criminal Law (Texas). Note 17 (1990): 143 |publisher=Saf.org |date= |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ammoland.com/2009/02/26/semi-automatic-rifle-ban-would-reduce-jobs-not-crime/ |title=National Shooting Sports Foundation: "Semi-Automatic Ban Would Reduce Jobs, Not Crime". February 27, 2009 |publisher=Ammoland.com |date=2009-02-26 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> and the Brady Campaign has, on occasion, used the terms interchangeably.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/1117 |title=Brady Campaign press release: "Assault Weapons, Weak Gun Laws Enable Dangerous People Like The Alabama Man Who Killed 10." Mar 11, 2009 |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2009-03-11 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/935 |title=Brady Campaign press release: "Gun Lobbyist and Gun Dealer Sandy Abrams Heads To Trial For Illegal Assault Weapon Sales, Cited For 900 Federal Gun Law Violations Over Nearly A Decade". Oct 16, 2007 |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2007-10-16 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> The Brady Campaign contends that [[Semi-automatic firearm|self-loading]] and [[Selective fire|select-fire]] weapons are virtually identical, since a [[semi-automatic rifle]] may be fired rapidly.<ref>[http://www.opposingviews.com/p/brady-campaign-explains-difference-between-automatic-weapons Brady Campaign: "Brady Campaign Explains Difference Between Automatic Weapons". March 02, 2009]{{dead link|date=December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.bradycampaign.org/?p=693 |title=Brady Campaign blog. "What’s The Difference Between A Fully Automatic And A Semi-Automatic Assault Weapon? About 3.5 Seconds." February 26th, 2009 |publisher=Blog.bradycampaign.org |date=2009-02-26 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref>
Writer Richard Lowry said that the term "[[assault weapon]]", used in the 1994 crime bill that followed the 1993 [[Brady Bill]] is a "manufactured term".<ref name="Lowry">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=bKumwTZunZYC&pg=PA96&dq=%2B%22assault+weapon%22+%2B%22semi-automatic%22#v=onepage&q=%2B%22assault%20weapon%22%20%2B%22semi-automatic%22&f=false|title=Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years|last=Lowry|first=Richard|year=2003|publisher=Regnery|page=96|accessdate=3 July 2010}}</ref> This term is used by the Brady Campaign to refer to [[semi-automatic rifle|semi-automatic]] or self-loading rifles.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/legislation/msassaultweapons |title=Federal Gun Laws Military - Style Assault Weapons |publisher=Brady Campaign |date= |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> Critics maintain this is done in order to conflate them in the public imagination with [[assault rifle]]s,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/EMorgan1.html |title=Eric C. Morgan. "Assault Rifle Legislation: Unwise and Unconstitutional." American Journal of Criminal Law (Texas). Note 17 (1990): 143 |publisher=Saf.org |date= |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ammoland.com/2009/02/26/semi-automatic-rifle-ban-would-reduce-jobs-not-crime/ |title=National Shooting Sports Foundation: "Semi-Automatic Ban Would Reduce Jobs, Not Crime". February 27, 2009 |publisher=Ammoland.com |date=2009-02-26 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> and the Brady Campaign has, on occasion, used the terms interchangeably.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/1117 |title=Brady Campaign press release: "Assault Weapons, Weak Gun Laws Enable Dangerous People Like The Alabama Man Who Killed 10." Mar 11, 2009 |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2009-03-11 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/935 |title=Brady Campaign press release: "Gun Lobbyist and Gun Dealer Sandy Abrams Heads To Trial For Illegal Assault Weapon Sales, Cited For 900 Federal Gun Law Violations Over Nearly A Decade". Oct 16, 2007 |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2007-10-16 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> The Brady Campaign contends that [[Semi-automatic firearm|self-loading]] and [[Selective fire|select-fire]] weapons are virtually identical, since a [[semi-automatic rifle]] may be fired rapidly.<ref>[http://www.opposingviews.com/p/brady-campaign-explains-difference-between-automatic-weapons Brady Campaign: "Brady Campaign Explains Difference Between Automatic Weapons". March 02, 2009]{{dead link|date=December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.bradycampaign.org/?p=693 |title=Brady Campaign blog. "What’s The Difference Between A Fully Automatic And A Semi-Automatic Assault Weapon? About 3.5 Seconds." February 26th, 2009 |publisher=Blog.bradycampaign.org |date=2009-02-26 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref>

The Brady Campaign refers to both [[Teflon-coated bullet|teflon-coated]]<ref name="Crooker">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ZDiPTMxyvMYC&pg=PA122&dq=%2Bbrady+%2B%22cop-killer%22#v=onepage&q=%2Bbrady%20%2B%22cop-killer%22&f=false|title=Gun control and gun rights|last=Crooker|first=Constance|year=2003|publisher=Greenwood Press|pages=107, 123|accessdate=3 July 2010}}</ref>{{Failed verification|date=July 2010}} and [[Hollow-point bullet|hollow-point]] handgun ammunition as "cop-killers"{{Citation needed|reason=Give examples|date=June 2010|reason=I found plenty for the Teflon ones, but nothing for the hollowpoints. --[[User:Faceless Enemy|Faceless Enemy]] ([[User talk:Faceless Enemy|talk]]) 12:44, 3 July 2010 (UTC)}}.{{By whom|Who criticised them for this?|Plenty of people, though I want to see more of their claims before I bother bringing critics in. [[User:Faceless Enemy|Faceless Enemy]] ([[User talk:Faceless Enemy|talk]]) 00:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)|date=July 2010}}


Additionally, the Campaign has in the past called for a ban of "plastic guns", after becoming concerned about the emergence of [[Glock pistol|polymer-framed handguns]] by [[Austria]]n weapons manufacturer [[Glock Ges.m.b.H.]].<ref>http://data.bradycampaign.org/about/history.php</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/244 |title=Press release from March 3, 2000: "NRA DOUBLE-TALK ON GUNS" |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2000-03-03 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> Critics pointed out that those handguns still contain many vital components made of metal (such as the [[Pistol slide|slide]], barrel and [[ammunition]]), and can be detected by conventional screening technologies. In addition, the type of polymer used in the so-called "plastic guns" is of a type that is opaque to X-ray scanners, rendering discussion over these "plastic guns" moot. There are no fully functional guns consisting only of polymer parts.<ref>Kennedy, Michael "Plastic Guns: New Weapons For Terrorists?", ''Toronto Star'', May 8, 1988, at B6.</ref><ref>Ruhl, Jesse Matthew; Rizer, Arthur L. III; Wier, Mikel J. "Gun Control: Targeting Rationality in a Loaded Debate", ''The Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy'', Volume XIII Number III</ref><ref name="Lott">{{cite web|url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/lott/lott21.html |title=John Lott: "The 'Plastic Gun' Hysteria". November 14, 2003 |publisher=Lewrockwell.com |date=2003-11-14 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> (It should, however, be noted that [[The Terrorist Firearms Detection Act]] in question only outlawed guns with less than 3.2 [[ounce|oz]] of metal in them, making the law largely symbolic for both sides; as 83.7% (by weight) of any Glock pistol is normal ordnance steel.<ref name="Lott"/>
Additionally, the Campaign has in the past called for a ban of "plastic guns", after becoming concerned about the emergence of [[Glock pistol|polymer-framed handguns]] by [[Austria]]n weapons manufacturer [[Glock Ges.m.b.H.]].<ref>http://data.bradycampaign.org/about/history.php</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bradycampaign.org/media/press/view/244 |title=Press release from March 3, 2000: "NRA DOUBLE-TALK ON GUNS" |publisher=Bradycampaign.org |date=2000-03-03 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> Critics pointed out that those handguns still contain many vital components made of metal (such as the [[Pistol slide|slide]], barrel and [[ammunition]]), and can be detected by conventional screening technologies. In addition, the type of polymer used in the so-called "plastic guns" is of a type that is opaque to X-ray scanners, rendering discussion over these "plastic guns" moot. There are no fully functional guns consisting only of polymer parts.<ref>Kennedy, Michael "Plastic Guns: New Weapons For Terrorists?", ''Toronto Star'', May 8, 1988, at B6.</ref><ref>Ruhl, Jesse Matthew; Rizer, Arthur L. III; Wier, Mikel J. "Gun Control: Targeting Rationality in a Loaded Debate", ''The Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy'', Volume XIII Number III</ref><ref name="Lott">{{cite web|url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/lott/lott21.html |title=John Lott: "The 'Plastic Gun' Hysteria". November 14, 2003 |publisher=Lewrockwell.com |date=2003-11-14 |accessdate=2011-12-08}}</ref> (It should, however, be noted that [[The Terrorist Firearms Detection Act]] in question only outlawed guns with less than 3.2 [[ounce|oz]] of metal in them, making the law largely symbolic for both sides; as 83.7% (by weight) of any Glock pistol is normal ordnance steel.<ref name="Lott"/>

Revision as of 08:00, 8 February 2012

Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
Formation1974
TypeNon-profit lobbying group
HeadquartersWashington, D.C.
Membership
Under 28,000[1]
Budget
$3,989,095 (2010)[2]
Websitewww.bradycampaign.org

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence are affiliated non-profit organizations in the United States. They are named after James Brady who was permanently disabled as a result of an assassination attempt on U.S. President Ronald Reagan in 1981. The mission statement of the Brady Campaign is "to enact and enforce sensible gun laws, regulations, and public policies through grassroots activism, electing public officials who support gun laws, and increasing public awareness of gun violence."[3] The Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence is a 501(c)(4).

The mission statement of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is "to reform the gun industry by enacting and enforcing sensible regulations to reduce gun violence, including regulations governing the gun industry. ... We educate the public about gun violence through litigation, grassroots mobilization, and outreach to affected communities."[3] The Brady Center is a 501(c)(3).

History

The Brady Campaign emerged from Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI), originally the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH), and the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence (CPHV). NCCH was founded in 1974 by Dr. Mark Borinsky, a victim of gun violence, and became HCI in 1980.[4]

On June 14, 2001, Handgun Control, Inc. was renamed the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence in honor of Sarah and Jim Brady.[4] On October 1, 2001, it incorporated the Million Mom March.[5]

In January 2010 the Better Business Bureau published its Charity Review on the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, stating that it failed to meet six (of twenty) standards for charity accountability. This report will expire in 2012.[2]

Leadership

Mark Borinsky founded the National Council to Control Handguns in 1974. He served as Chair until 1976. Charlie Orasin was a key player in the founding and growth of Handgun Control (HCI). He worked at HCI from 1975 until 1992.[6]

Nelson "Pete" Shields became the organization's chairman in 1978 and retired in 1989.[7]

James and Sarah Brady have been influential in the movement since at least the mid-1980s. Mrs. Brady became chair in 1989, and the Bradys became the namesakes of the organization in 2000.[8]

Richard Aborn served as president from 1992 until 1996 and went on to form the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City.[9][10]

From 2000 to May 2006 former Maryland Congressman Michael D. Barnes was the president of the Brady Campaign.[9]

Former Fort Wayne, Indiana mayor Paul Helmke served from July 2006 to July 2011, exactly 5 years.[11]

In February of 2012, on Sarah Brady's 70th birthday, Dan Gross was announced as the new president. He is one of the founders of the Center to Prevent Youth Violence (formerly PAX). [12]

Stated mission

From Brady Campaign's website:

"As the largest national, non-partisan, grassroots organization leading the fight to prevent gun violence, the Brady Campaign, the Million Mom March and the Brady Center are dedicated to creating an America free from gun violence, where all Americans are safe at home, at school, at work, and in their communities. The Brady Campaign, the Million Mom March and the Brady Center believe that a safer America can be achieved without banning all guns."[13]

In 1976 then chairman Nelson "Pete" Shields stated

"We'll take one step at a time, and the first is necessarily - given the political realities - very modest. We'll have to start working again to strengthen the law, and then again to strengthen the next law and again and again. Our ultimate goal, total control of handguns, is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down production and sales. Next is to get registration. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and ammunition (with a few exceptions) totally illegal.[14]

In November 2008, Paul Helmke endorsed the American Hunters and Shooters Association by stating, "I see our issues as complementary to theirs".[15]

Efforts and actions

Template:2009 Brady Campaign State Scorecard HCI was the chief supporter of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, known as the "Brady Bill", enacted in 1993 after a seven-year debate; and successfully lobbied for passage of the first-ever Federal Assault Weapons Ban, banning the manufacture and importation of so-called military-style assault weapons,[16] a provision that critics called "arbitrary"[17] and "symbolic".[18] The ban expired in September 2004.[19]

In May 2005, Florida passed a "Stand Your Ground" law that authorized persons attacked in their own home or automobile to use lethal force in self-defense without a duty to retreat;[20] Brady Campaign workers passed out fliers at Florida airports warning tourists that, under what they called the "Shoot First" law, tourists could be shot for simply being rude to a Florida resident.[21] When such laws were proposed in other states, the Brady Campaign warned they would result in vigilantism.[22]

On March 19, 2009, a federal judge ordered a temporary injunction blocking the implementation of the rule allowing concealed carry permit holders to carry firearms concealed within National Park Service lands within states where their permits are valid, based upon environmental concerns, in response to efforts by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association, and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.[23][24] On May 20, 2009, the injunction was overturned by the passing of an amendment to the Credit CARD Act of 2009, added by Senator Tom Coburn (R, OK) over the objections of the Brady Campaign.[25]

Supreme Court cases

U.S. Supreme Court rulings in 2008 and 2010 have affirmed the right of citizens to own and use firearms in their homes for self-defense. District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) ruled that the Second Amendment was an individual (rather than collective) right, like the rest of the Bill of Rights. McDonald v. Chicago (2010) ruled that the Second Amendment was incorporated against the states under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and struck down[26] a Chicago ordinance banning handguns. In both cases the Brady Campaign was not entirely happy with the outcome,[27] stating that they were worried that a decrease in government regulation of firearms would result in more gun deaths and gun violence. They however have stated they are pleased that neither case outcome precluded the ability of government, either federal or local, to institute some level of continued firearm regulations.[28]

Criticism

Terminology

Writer Richard Lowry said that the term "assault weapon", used in the 1994 crime bill that followed the 1993 Brady Bill is a "manufactured term".[29] This term is used by the Brady Campaign to refer to semi-automatic or self-loading rifles.[30] Critics maintain this is done in order to conflate them in the public imagination with assault rifles,[31][32] and the Brady Campaign has, on occasion, used the terms interchangeably.[33][34] The Brady Campaign contends that self-loading and select-fire weapons are virtually identical, since a semi-automatic rifle may be fired rapidly.[35][36]

Additionally, the Campaign has in the past called for a ban of "plastic guns", after becoming concerned about the emergence of polymer-framed handguns by Austrian weapons manufacturer Glock Ges.m.b.H..[37][38] Critics pointed out that those handguns still contain many vital components made of metal (such as the slide, barrel and ammunition), and can be detected by conventional screening technologies. In addition, the type of polymer used in the so-called "plastic guns" is of a type that is opaque to X-ray scanners, rendering discussion over these "plastic guns" moot. There are no fully functional guns consisting only of polymer parts.[39][40][41] (It should, however, be noted that The Terrorist Firearms Detection Act in question only outlawed guns with less than 3.2 oz of metal in them, making the law largely symbolic for both sides; as 83.7% (by weight) of any Glock pistol is normal ordnance steel.[41]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Brady Campaign mailing list numbers from Jan. 2010". Retrieved 2010-06-13.
  2. ^ a b "Charity review of Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence". Better Business Bureau. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
  3. ^ a b "Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence : About". Bradycampaign.org. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  4. ^ a b "About the Brady Campaign: A History of Working to Prevent Gun ownership". Bradycampaign.org. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  5. ^ "How We Started". Million Mom March. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  6. ^ "Biographies: Additional". bradycenter.org. Retrieved Feb 3, 2012.
  7. ^ "Nelson Shields 3d, 69, Gun-Control Advocate". New York Times. 1993-01-07. Retrieved 14 November 2008. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  8. ^ "Biographies: Sarah Brady". bradycenter.org. Retrieved Feb 3, 2012.
  9. ^ a b "Brady Campaign: Biographies: Additional Biographies". Bradycenter.org. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  10. ^ "Richard Aborn for Manhattan DA". The Nation. 2009-05-19. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  11. ^ "Brady Campaign: Biographies: Paul Helmke". Bradycenter.org. 2011-03-13. Retrieved 2012-02-07.
  12. ^ "Brady Campaign: Biographies: Dan Gross". Bradycenter.org. 2012-02-07. Retrieved 2012-02-07.
  13. ^ "Our Mission". The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Retrieved 2008-10-28.
  14. ^ Richard Harris, "A Reporter at Large: Handguns," New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 53, 58; see also: Josh Sugarmann, "The NRA is right; but we still need to ban handguns", Washington Monthly, 1 Jun 1987.
  15. ^ Birnbaum, Jeffrey H (2008-03-18). "New Pro-Gun Group Hopes to Draw From the NRA". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
  16. ^ Barak, Gregg (2007). Battleground. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 335. ISBN 0313340404. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  17. ^ Wilkie, Dana (2004-03-20). "Effectiveness of assault-weapon bans still unclear". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 14 November 2008. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  18. ^ Kopel, Dave (2004-09-14). "Bait-'n'-Switch". National Review. Retrieved 14 November 2008. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  19. ^ Siebel, Brian (2004-09-14). "The Assault Weapons Ban: Brady Campaign". The Washington Post. Retrieved 14 November 2008. {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  20. ^ "David Kopel, "Florida's New Self-Defense Law" 19 May 2005". Volokh.com. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  21. ^ Goodnough, Abby (2005-10-04). "The New York Times. "Tourists to Florida Get a Warning as Greeting", by Abby Goodnough. Published: October 4, 2005". Florida: Nytimes.com. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  22. ^ Willing, Richard (2006-03-21). "William Willing, "States allow deadly self-defense", USA Today, 20 Mar 2006". Usatoday.com. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  23. ^ Judge Blocks Rule Permitting Concealed Guns In U.S. Parks Washington Post, March 20, 2009.
  24. ^ "Copy of Injunction" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  25. ^ "Congress Approves Bill Restricting Credit Card Industry, Allowing Guns in Parks — Political News". FOXNews.com. 2009-05-20. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  26. ^ David Rittgers (2010-07-29). "One Month after McDonald - David Rittgers - National Review Online". Nationalreview.com. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  27. ^ "Brady Campaign Uses Lethal Logic on DC v Heller Anniversary". Opposingviews.com. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  28. ^ Montopoli, Brian (2010-06-28). "Supreme Court Gun Rights Decision: A Win or a Setback?". CBS News.
  29. ^ Lowry, Richard (2003). Legacy: Paying the Price for the Clinton Years. Regnery. p. 96. Retrieved 3 July 2010.
  30. ^ "Federal Gun Laws Military - Style Assault Weapons". Brady Campaign. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  31. ^ "Eric C. Morgan. "Assault Rifle Legislation: Unwise and Unconstitutional." American Journal of Criminal Law (Texas). Note 17 (1990): 143". Saf.org. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  32. ^ "National Shooting Sports Foundation: "Semi-Automatic Ban Would Reduce Jobs, Not Crime". February 27, 2009". Ammoland.com. 2009-02-26. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  33. ^ "Brady Campaign press release: "Assault Weapons, Weak Gun Laws Enable Dangerous People Like The Alabama Man Who Killed 10." Mar 11, 2009". Bradycampaign.org. 2009-03-11. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  34. ^ "Brady Campaign press release: "Gun Lobbyist and Gun Dealer Sandy Abrams Heads To Trial For Illegal Assault Weapon Sales, Cited For 900 Federal Gun Law Violations Over Nearly A Decade". Oct 16, 2007". Bradycampaign.org. 2007-10-16. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  35. ^ Brady Campaign: "Brady Campaign Explains Difference Between Automatic Weapons". March 02, 2009[dead link]
  36. ^ "Brady Campaign blog. "What's The Difference Between A Fully Automatic And A Semi-Automatic Assault Weapon? About 3.5 Seconds." February 26th, 2009". Blog.bradycampaign.org. 2009-02-26. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  37. ^ http://data.bradycampaign.org/about/history.php
  38. ^ "Press release from March 3, 2000: "NRA DOUBLE-TALK ON GUNS"". Bradycampaign.org. 2000-03-03. Retrieved 2011-12-08.
  39. ^ Kennedy, Michael "Plastic Guns: New Weapons For Terrorists?", Toronto Star, May 8, 1988, at B6.
  40. ^ Ruhl, Jesse Matthew; Rizer, Arthur L. III; Wier, Mikel J. "Gun Control: Targeting Rationality in a Loaded Debate", The Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume XIII Number III
  41. ^ a b "John Lott: "The 'Plastic Gun' Hysteria". November 14, 2003". Lewrockwell.com. 2003-11-14. Retrieved 2011-12-08.

Further reading