Jump to content

Talk:Kerry Fraser: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|listas=Fraser, Kerry
|listas=Fraser, Kerry
}}
}}

==Formatting==
This article should be reformatted. I think it should be categorized into Personal Life, Professional Refereeing, and Career after Refereeing.


==Untitled==
==Untitled==

Revision as of 19:14, 22 February 2012

WikiProject iconIce Hockey Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Formatting

This article should be reformatted. I think it should be categorized into Personal Life, Professional Refereeing, and Career after Refereeing.

Untitled

"He is not well liked because he usually calls everything against some team and never against another, and is also panned for giving stupid penalties in Stanley Cup final games" is POV ("stupid", "usually calles everything against some team and never against another", etc.) Bearcat 09:37, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

How about a line about his "hair" and his tendancy to call non existant penalties. I think I have some POV issues if I put them in the article the way I'm thinking, so feel free to word it as you like Tawker 02:38, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence tying his absence from the 2007 playoffs and the Leafs/Islanders call. Also as far as 'Famous controversial calls' go, this one hardly has any notoriety outside of fans of one team. Special J 12:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special J, that is the point, Kerry Fraser is known for being biased against the leafs, and yet he is always the referee that is used for important leafs games. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.58.85 (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like it was written by his publicist

Quotes about cutesy things like choosing his number because of his wife, etc. shouldn't be here. Can someone not personally related to or a dedicated fan of Fraser please clean this up? 99.234.182.107 (talk) 19:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of one of the most famous non calls in sports history?

Maybe a bit of a dramatic subject line, but seriously that 1993 "missed" call between the Leafs and Kings is something that people in Toronto still haven't forgiven, and Kerry himself said he wished he could do it again... 02:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)GNU4eva (talk)

IIRC, the mentions of that and other controversial calls were previously put on this article, but were removed due to violations of the Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy since there were not properly cited with reliable sources. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That 1993 call is easily the most famous blown call in NHL history (and I'm not even a Leafs fan). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.58.85 (talk) 15:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again, it was removed due to violations of the Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy since there were not properly cited with reliable sources. If you have some, feel free to re-add it back in. Zzyzx11 (talk) 18:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no, not this again. In the past, people have provided a plethora of sources, The Globe and Mail, The Star, YouTube videos, TSN.ca, Sportsnet.ca, books about the event, and everything else under the sun and some edit-warring article white knight guardian has removed it. Kerry Fraser even talks about it at great length in his recently-released autobiography, and apologized for missing the call. It is notable and it is extremely well-cited but I'm not going to the trouble of replacing it in the article because the argument that it must be removed because it's not properly sourced and then inviting people to add it again when they've found proper sources is a ridiculous circular argument. Instead of removing it, why not add the sources yourself? Because Wikipedia is about making sure articles that millions of gullible people accept as fact suit one's point of view... Wannabe rockstar (talk) 00:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]