Talk:Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Unsourced casts

I just recently removed mentioned casts that aren't sourced. I was going to explain myself but I accidently saved my revisions before I could so I will explain myself here. If you bring a new cast in the article, they must be sourced to confirm it. Thank you. − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 23:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Is someone removing my edits about Christopher Lambert being confirmed, and the question of whether or not this is a sequel or a reboot? If so, why? All of these sources are confirmed in the works cited page. 3/23/11

Need of TBA or Unknown Cast?

Is there really a need of writing TBA or Unknown cast just because they are being sourced? Please help me since I'm noticing this in many upcoming film articlesAshu (talk) 12:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Reception section is unbalanced

OK, first, there is the source of the review, a source I've never heard of in my entire 50 years of life. THEN, add in the description for membership with that source, per Wiki, "The marathon is invite-only via an application process. Before BNAT 5 in 2003, there were typically two ways to gain admittance – one for Austin residents that usually involved some event (such as BNAT 4 in 2002 having a costume contest at a horror movie screening at an abandoned mental institution on Halloween), then a separate one for those not in the Central Texas area. After BNAT 5, the application process was changed to internet-only involving several essay-style questions and submissions of pictures, which is then used to create a yearbook with all the registered attendees. Competition to get in is fierce, as 10,000 or more applicants attempt to gain one of the approximately 200 seats. This system was put into place to ensure that only die-hard film fans would be in attendance as well as to be fair, as attendance is limited to the seating capacity of the Alamo Drafthouse." AND no OTHER sources. Sorry, folks but in my "neck of the woods", one source is OR or at least POV. Can someone kindly fix that? Otherwise, I suggest removal of the review portion. THAT all said, knowing Hollywood's propensity for brand capitalization, I'd not be surprised with a bomb...Wzrd1 (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

POV and OR have nothing to do with the number of sources cited in a section. Please read those policies more carefully in order to familiarize yourself with them.

As for the section in question, the number of sources cited in it will increase as the article is developed, and after the film is released. Nightscream (talk) 12:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Reboot

This is actually more of a reboot than a direct sequel to the first film with the only link being Nicholas Cage. The origin and other facits are different than the first film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.108.181.185 (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Being of the few who actually sat through this steaming pile, you are wrong sir/madam. It's a continuation and references the first film many times. I guess you left the movie early - wise move.

Edit request on 27 February 2012

The town in Romania was not Targu-Jiu, but Sibiu.

98.196.42.190 (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Celestra (talk) 01:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 1 March 2012

Can you please add the box office for this movie so far? --68.118.190.224 (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

If you can cite a reliable source for it per WP:V, WP:IRS, WP:CS, et al., absolutely. Nightscream (talk) 06:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)