Jump to content

Talk:Malacañang Palace: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
re-assess WikiProject Arch: not Top importance globally
Gareon (talk | contribs)
(No difference)

Revision as of 01:38, 2 May 2012

WikiProject iconTambayan Philippines Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconArchitecture Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

If it's "Malacañang Palace" is erroneous, why don't we move the article then to "Malacañan Palace"?

Because it is not erroneous. AFAIK, both Malacañang Palace and Malacañan Palace are correct. --Jojit fb 08:01, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
According to this site, the two are always interchangeable. --Jojit fb 08:10, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not so long ago a signpost was erected along Osmeña Ave., and it displays "MALACAÑAN". Perhaps we should rename the article, or should the current title be retained?
Malacañang Palace is the most popular name so that should be the article name. --Howard the Duck | talk, 05:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You still have the problem that officially, it is Malacañan Palace and Malacañang. So better to apply a consistent policy: are official residences referred to by their popular name and spelling, or according to the official terminology? Gareon 06:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you cite reliable sources regarding its official name? This is the only way to resolve the issue otherwise the popular name should be its title here in Wikipedia. --Jojit fb 06:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As said at WP:NC:
Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature.
IMHO, most English language speakers and even Pinoys easily recognize Malacanang, not Malacanan. --Howard the Duck | talk, 09:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's clear then. Re: reliable source, there's the official stationery of the president, and the official history of the Palace which was published in 2005.Gareon 10:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just added some sourced material on the name.Anyo Niminus (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.gov.ph/2011/01/17/briefer-on-the-new-malacanang-briefing-room-signage/ - On the issue of the name:
If we are talking about the official usage, then the above statement from the Official Gazette makes it clear that Malacañan Palace is the name of the building itself, while Malacañang (without the word "Palace") is refers to the Office of the President. However, the popular name must also be considered. Mk32 (talk) 20:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Google search on the name:
Mk32 (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(NOTE: I asked to move the page at the Tambayan, but it did not get support, so I will not continue to ask for a move Mk32 (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

File:Malacaanggrounds.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Malacaanggrounds.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rizal hall.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Rizal hall.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:State dining room.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:State dining room.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Music room.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Music room.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalayaan hall.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kalayaan hall.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summarize

This article seems to be too long so it needs to shorten. Only the important details must be emphasize. I'm sure that not all of the information in this article is correct and sure. Please allow me to share my ideas by giving some suggestions and requests:

  • Check all the information in this article, by finding reliable references or visiting and taking a tour around the Malacañang Palace.
  • Summarizing the Main Article. As i search about several Presidential Palace and some different architectures, I found out that Halls, Buildings and more about the interior of the structure was not given more attention. but i recommend that Palace halls must be separated into another article. but the section Palace Halls will remain in this article but it must be change to a Gallery.
  • Lastly, I recommend this as a structure of the article:
  1. Etymology
  2. History
  3. Interior of the Palace (this is a separate article which include the Entrance Hall, Heroes Hall, Grand Staircase, Reception Hall, Ceremonial Hall, State Dining Room, Rizal Room, The Music Room, Private Quarters, Mabini Hall, Administration and Executive Buildings, The Presidential Study, New Executive Building, Kalayaan Hall, The Malacañang Museum, The Former Presidential Museum Bonifacio Hall, The Premier Guest House, Palace Guesthouses and Malacañang Park and the Bahay Pangarap}
  4. Gardens
  5. Malacañang Grounds

I hope my idea will help to improve and this article to a better one, giving correct information on correct and proper way... - 121.54.2.91 (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]