User talk:ClueBot Commons: Difference between revisions
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:{{CB-FPWarn}} The bot operator doesn't have the time to do all the false positives manually I'm afraid.--[[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 00:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
:{{CB-FPWarn}} The bot operator doesn't have the time to do all the false positives manually I'm afraid.--[[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 00:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
Well turn it off then if you're not willing to do the work. I'm certainly not going to do it for you. |
Revision as of 00:34, 3 June 2012
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
ClueBots | |
---|---|
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script | ![]() |
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
|
Revertathon
Hey Cluebot! You want to have a vandalism revertathon, where the one of us who reverts the most vandalism in 24 hours wins? Legolover26 (talk) 19:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose it will needlessly supprt reckless unnecessary reverts and would most likely be followed by a WARNathon, TEMPLATEathon and even BLOCKathon. Besides in case you are not aware, this is a wp:BOT not a real user. --ÐℬigXЯaɣ 07:25, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Question regarding Archive-Now
I've added some tags to Talk:2012 in UFC events for explicitly archiving threads that are not helpful over 24 hours ago, yet the Cluebot3 archiving service is not vanishing these off into the night. Can you please illuminate for me as to why the page isn't being serviced? Hasteur (talk) 17:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- CB3 is being a little bit shaky at the moment with staying up... I need to take a look it at, just bear with it ;) - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 23:07, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
My Edit You messaged me About
My Edit you messaged me about was NOT vandalism. 74.176.74.91 (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, your good faith edits did leave the article in a damaged state. While not vandalism, this probably explains why ClueBot NG got confused. If you need further assistance, you could ask at the article's talk page. – Wdchk (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Dude
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Venture_capital&diff=prev&oldid=495401525 What is this? I am not going to jump through the hoops for the false positive experience. The bot operator should do that. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Template:CB-FPWarn The bot operator doesn't have the time to do all the false positives manually I'm afraid.--5 albert square (talk) 00:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Well turn it off then if you're not willing to do the work. I'm certainly not going to do it for you.