Talk:Anita Sarkeesian

Edit War

I would prefer if my edit of her be reverted because there is evidence to support my statement that she hates men. --203.206.73.28 (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

All her videos are addressed to only her own gender, there for it already implies she only has love for her own gender. No matter what anyone writes they are somehow a misogynist even if the female characters aren't even remotely stereotyped. She refers all men as "Dicks" both in fantasy and in reality implying that she believes all males think about is only having sex. When ever a character is abused or raped she says "we fear being raped enough without seeing it on television" she doesn't try to protect women from being sexually abused she is pointing the finger to three and a half billion people in the world and saying all males are like that. A lot of the tropes she addresses can work both ways but TV Tropes likes to promote Double standards and favour one gender over another that is total hippocracy. The Anti-Feminist who who want women to be inferior to men and the Anti-Feminist who are disgusted by some or all forms of Feminism for not aiming for equality but supremacy are two completely different groups of people and opinions. Do you know what else? She lies in one of her videos that feminist aren't misandrist in the real life and anyone who says likewise in that video are also lying. What I have stated about her above proves that they all are man hating educators. So I ask again can you edit back my blog of this page. --203.206.73.28 (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

• Neither blogs nor TV Tropes are reliable sources, and Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a forum to vent your disapproval of the person (or of feminism in general). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not the first to question this individual's education and am certainly not the first to say sexism is not limited to only one gender on this site. Look on the discussion pages of the article of sexism. The article addressed stereotyping and wrongdoing to both sexes but now it is only in favour of one because the editors believed only males are sexist and all males are sexist even if they are opening the door for a women. --203.206.73.28 (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

What does any of this have to do with the article? Since when is Wikipedia a message board? —scarecroe (talk) 01:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

These commenter might find it suitable to change to a wiki with a skewed perception of life compatible with theirs, like conservapedia or something. 190.103.67.221 (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Harassment via Wikipedia Vandalism

It's worth mentioning that people have been vandalizing this page in a particularly nasty way. I'm not sure if it's relevant or necessary, but it might be worth mentioning that she's specifically keeping track of ways in which she's being harassed online:

"I went back and forth about whether or not to share this publicly because I don’t want to inadvertently encourage this kind of behavior or scare other women into staying silent out of fear something similar may happen to them. But ultimately I’ve decided I’m going to document and strategically share what is happening to me because these types of online harassment tactics are used against women, feminists and people from oppressed and marginalized groups everyday."

She previously wrote an article on [misogyny on Youtube http://www.feministfrequency.com/2012/06/harassment-misogyny-and-silencing-on-youtube/]. 77.250.97.191 (talk) 23:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)