Jump to content

Talk:Gibraltar 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WPs
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{PrimateTalk|importance=mid|class=stub}}
{{PrimateTalk|importance=mid|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Anthropology|importance=top|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Anthropology|importance=top|class=stub}}

==Removed edit==
A banned user had made the following edit:

However the specimen was not properly examined until almost fifty years after it was found. Later anthropologists such as [[William Johnson Sollas]], [[Wynfrid Duckworth]], [[Marcellin Boule]] and [[Arthur Keith]] all examined the specimen. It has been shown that the specimen is similar to other western European Neanderthals.<ref>Peter J. Whybrow ''Travels With the Fossil Hunters'' Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 43 ISBN 0521664039</ref>

While the editor is banned, this particular edit seems fine to me. Can it be reinstated without provoking some sort of reaction from the patrollers? [[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 12:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:46, 15 June 2012

WikiProject iconGibraltar Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconHuman Genetic History (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconPrimates Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnthropology Stub‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Removed edit

A banned user had made the following edit:

However the specimen was not properly examined until almost fifty years after it was found. Later anthropologists such as William Johnson Sollas, Wynfrid Duckworth, Marcellin Boule and Arthur Keith all examined the specimen. It has been shown that the specimen is similar to other western European Neanderthals.[1]

While the editor is banned, this particular edit seems fine to me. Can it be reinstated without provoking some sort of reaction from the patrollers? Petter Bøckman (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Peter J. Whybrow Travels With the Fossil Hunters Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 43 ISBN 0521664039