Talk:Pine Island Glacier: Difference between revisions
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) Reverted 1 edit by 108.73.113.91 (talk): Even if you're not the sock of a blocked editor, it's not related to improving the article, and the signature is incoherent. (TW) |
→Add photo link: new section |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* January 2012 in-print issue, page 34 & 35 ''Antarctic Undercut'' by Douglas Fox. [[Special:Contributions/97.87.29.188|97.87.29.188]] ([[User talk:97.87.29.188|talk]]) 01:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC) |
* January 2012 in-print issue, page 34 & 35 ''Antarctic Undercut'' by Douglas Fox. [[Special:Contributions/97.87.29.188|97.87.29.188]] ([[User talk:97.87.29.188|talk]]) 01:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Add photo link == |
|||
From[[Skeptic (U.S. magazine)]] coverstory ''[http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/12-02-08/#feature ''How We Know Global Warming is Real and Human Caused'']'' in current Volume 17 Number 2 [[Skeptic (U.S. magazine)]], with cover photo caption: "A massive crack across Antarctica’s Pine Island Glacier will produce a giant iceberg of about 350 sq. miles (900 square k)" citing credit: NASA/ GSFC/METI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team. Added linked [http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2165.html photo] |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/108.73.113.185|108.73.113.185]] ([[User talk:108.73.113.185|talk]]) 04:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:45, 7 July 2012
![]() | Pine Island Glacier has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
Glaciers GA‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Antarctica GA‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Pine Island Glacier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- None provided.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- None Provided.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
There were some formatting errors, but I think the article is overall a very good article. ceranthor 22:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Your last sentence in the acceleration section. It would seem that this question can be explored more by describing the acceleration observed. Polargeo I encourage you to do so. That is where is acceleration greatest, is it propogating. This will help indicate whether it is a calving front-ice shelf or upstream induced phenomenon. I did the bathymetry for the Polar Freeze journey for T.Kellogg and T.Hughes.
2010 Katz model
The paper just published in Proc royal soc does not really support any of the media hype. it is the testing of a fairly basic mathematical model on grounding line stability which just adds a peripheral Pine Island Glacier(ish) study. A quote from the paper if you are unconvinced "Given the complex, three-dimensional nature of the real Pine Island glacier, with its convergent feeder streams and subglacial hydrology, it should be clear that the above model is a very crude representation of reality" from the paper "Stability of ice-sheet grounding lines" Katz and Worster 2010. Polargeo (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
File:PineIslandBay.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:PineIslandBay.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC) |
National Geographic resource
- January 2012 in-print issue, page 34 & 35 Antarctic Undercut by Douglas Fox. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 01:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Add photo link
FromSkeptic (U.S. magazine) coverstory How We Know Global Warming is Real and Human Caused in current Volume 17 Number 2 Skeptic (U.S. magazine), with cover photo caption: "A massive crack across Antarctica’s Pine Island Glacier will produce a giant iceberg of about 350 sq. miles (900 square k)" citing credit: NASA/ GSFC/METI/ERSDAC/JAROS, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team. Added linked photo