Talk:Conformal cyclic cosmology: Difference between revisions
m Anthony Appleyard moved page Talk:Conformal Cyclic Cosmology to Talk:Conformal cyclic cosmology: Requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves as uncontroversial (//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=498732719#mover... |
→Spacelike ??: new section |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
It doesn't appear to offer any perspective from other physicists in terms of secondary sources. Instead we have an article which appears to be based on a popular non-fiction book. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 10:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
It doesn't appear to offer any perspective from other physicists in terms of secondary sources. Instead we have an article which appears to be based on a popular non-fiction book. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 10:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Spacelike ?? == |
|||
This phrase: "the boundary between aeons is not a boundary at all, but just a spacelike surface that can be passed across like any other" used in the Property section is confusing to me. I thought there is no possibility of connecting space-like separated events in General Relativity??? Shouldn't it be time-like?[[Special:Contributions/71.31.148.44|71.31.148.44]] ([[User talk:71.31.148.44|talk]]) 18:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:08, 15 July 2012
Physics Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Astronomy Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Null hypothesis?
The article cited regarding "low probability of null hypothesis" does not mention the null hypothesis anywhere. How is that conclusion drawn from the paper cited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.204.31 (talk) 07:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- While not using the phrase "null hypothesis", starting on the bottom of page 4 and continuing on most of page 5, it discusses possible other causes of the claimed phenomena, e.g. instrument noise etc. Lenborje (talk) 08:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Perspective
It doesn't appear to offer any perspective from other physicists in terms of secondary sources. Instead we have an article which appears to be based on a popular non-fiction book. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Spacelike ??
This phrase: "the boundary between aeons is not a boundary at all, but just a spacelike surface that can be passed across like any other" used in the Property section is confusing to me. I thought there is no possibility of connecting space-like separated events in General Relativity??? Shouldn't it be time-like?71.31.148.44 (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)