User talk:67.142.168.25: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:58, 19 July 2012

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Brownback. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DCmacnut <> 04:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pre-Columbian era has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. – iridescent 17:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Watching Rainbows, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Watching Rainbows was changed by 67.142.168.25 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935414 on 2011-01-19T02:23:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cntras (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hanging Gardens of Babylon with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Babylonia with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wee Bee Foolish has been reverted.
Your edit here to Wee Bee Foolish was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.myspace.com/weebeefoolish) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:47, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Thomas & Friends, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --Rob Sinden (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas & Friends

Rather than blindly reverting my edits, please could you discuss the issues you have with them on the talk page. You are not being constructive. It seems that you like the page in the poor condition that it is in! I am trying to address some of the serious issues it is suffering from. --Rob Sinden (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sorry... =( 67.142.168.25 (talk) 20:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts on Bigshowandkane64

Right now I feel sorry for user:Bigshowandkane64. Because He wasn't trying to be mean or do an edit war, he was just adding some important info to Thomas & Friends. He know's a lot about the whole show and the does not diserve to be blocked. He needs to be unblocked, besides the users just don't understand him at all. But I understand him very well. He want's respect from other users and he's a nice person too. I think the Wikipedia users needs to give him another chance. I think so too. 67.142.168.25 (talk) 01:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 ===My thoughts on Bigshowandkane64===
 Right now I feel sorry for [[user:Bigshowandkane64]]. Because He wasn't trying to be mean or do an edit war, he was just adding some important info to [[Thomas & Friends]]. He know's a lot about the whole show and the does not diserve to be blocked. He needs to be unblocked, besides the users just don't understand him at all. But I understand him very well. He want's respect from other users and he's a nice person too. I think the Wikipedia users needs to give him another chance. I think so too. [[Special:Contributions/67.142.168.25|67.142.168.25]] ([[User talk:67.142.168.25#top|talk]]) 01:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
-===Fuck Wikipedia===
-I've had it with wikipedia. No user and other editors don't even except my edits at all. I was only adding some info that is important to my favorite pages but instead you users and wikipedia are just trying to make it very difficult for me and by blocking my accounts. And for being mean to me to you jerks. I've tried to send an unblocked request so many times and they don't even accept any of them and they alway decline my request. >=( Thank you wikipedia and you asshole users, thank you for making my life very fucken difficult and very hard on this site. >=( Assholes... [[Special:Contributions/67.142.168.25|67.142.168.25]] ([[User talk:67.142.168.25#top|talk]]) 15:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)