User talk:91.157.92.31

WP:ERA

Per WP:ERA, where it says "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors", do not change date styles on articles as you did here on the Cahokia article. Thank you. Heiro 16:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Per WP:ERA, where it says "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors", do not change date styles as you did here on the Cahokia article. This is now the second time you have done this, even after being cautioned not to above. Please do not repeat this behavior and please do read up on our policy on date style changes at WP:ERA. Thank you. Heiro 18:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cahokia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. last chance, please stop this Dougweller (talk) 16:54, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a media experiment of free speech and double standard. Best of luck in your double standard path. You will going to need it. If you feel irritated because of the sound of church bells but not when hearing the horn of ice-cream truck, YOU have a problem, not me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.157.92.31 (talk • contribs)

Just edit within out policies, there is no double standard, they apply to everyone. Heiro 13:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

- Your claim is false because it doesnt happen like you claim. From my other ip's I have made similar edits. Only difference has been that whoever can change AD to CE, but not CE to AD. If that is not a double standard, then I dont know anything in philosophy of science. This a test of biased elité.

If you are caught doing the same thing on other IPs you will be reverted and warned there too. If you continue to do it here I will ask for this IP to be blocked from editing Wikipedia and an other IP that you can be caught editing from. This type of behavior violates our policies on WP:DISRUPTIVE, WP:POINT as well as WP:ERA. Choice is yours. Consider this a final warning on the matter, next instance and I take this to the appropriate admin board to seek a block. Heiro 19:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Actually, after looking at your recent spate of edits today, and reverting all of the WP:POINT violations that hadn't already been reverted by other editors or vandalrevertbots, consider this a FINAL "FINAL WARNING". We are not here for your amusement or to let you push your religious ideology. Heiro 19:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Everybody have religious ideology, like you. It is not scientific to say that somebody does not have that. You can not make science with out basic beliefs of knowledge. It is funny you came out with your own religion with such a aggression. Another "funny" (actually terrible) prove is that you DID NOT DENY my claim of double standard you elité members of society have. So why it is possible what I have done. Why do you sensors have double standard. I assume you give me copyrights for this conversation because this is part of our project of media discussion. I am not satisfied with your professionalship.

"If you are caught doing the same thing on other IPs you will be reverted and warned there too." - how do you know WHO it is/was? Sorry but that is not in your power.

You do not have any copyright for anyone else's posts. You can repost your own elsewhere so long as you attribute it to Wikipedia. That's why it says at the bottom "you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL.". There's no point in denying anything else you write, and probably even this, as you won't believe it. Dougweller (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Heiro. So I cannot quote, ok. But of course I can use dialoque like I want (as I am the other participiant). Im sorry You cannot deny my empirical test result. Maybe you dont like what has happened. Double standard is something fundamentalist thinking. You should abandon that. Nice to do co-operation with you Heiro.

I'm not Heiro, and if you knew anything about science or testing you'd know that yours is a fatally flawed test. Dougweller (talk) 12:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Heiro, but why then I have M.Sc from distinquished U? The problem in your claim (that my test failed) is that you cannot prove that. Of course it was succesfull. At least my collegues agreed with me. And so did many of those you have been messing in Wikipedia. But from wich ip I had those talks...hmmmm... Just keep on guessing. Every time you answer, I feel bad, I should not to tease minors. I am sorry.

Why are we continuing to let someone run an unapproved "test" on live articles? This user does not seem to be here to improve Wikipedia, but to push their own agenda, which seems to be (although its hard to tell given their poor grasp of English grammatical rules) a preference for BC/AD. I'm starting to wonder if maybe this is just a garden variety trolling experiment. Anyone running an actual scientific experiment would have a much better grasp of the English language than this. Either way, admitting to being here solely to be disruptive and push your agenda is still a violation of WP:POINT and WP:DISRUPTIVE, on top of the multiple WP:ERA violations. Please stop. If you have a problem with how wp:era is applied, take it to the Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, but I'd read up on the multiple threads in the archives first. Heiro 17:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I have made tip of you gents to antifascist organizations and Wikipedia modes. You represent fascist ideology and suppression on science. You should put to asylum or jail.

I have a approval for this test, but of course not yours. Where is that ban you promised for me? I send to Wikipedia a tip that you have been preaching as a moderator I began to think you are just a kid with a computadora in your room and alone. Please, read Sokrates and Aristoteles, you will learn about logic and scintific thinking. It is funny to realise, you have not even tried to refute my arguments. Please, I beg your to start depading when you enter high school, or whatever educational facility you have in America. Please, just dont try to thik we all are equal. We have different levels of knowledge. ... and please forgive me. English is not my idioma. One of the five I cope with it is still. Thank you for your american english, it is nice to read time to time.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Randolph County, Illinois, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Randolph County, Illinois was changed by 91.157.92.31 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866948 on 2012-07-28T08:59:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)